發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-16 09:17

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：貪污受賄犯罪之量刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的再界定　出處：《比較法研究》2017年01期 　論文類型：期刊論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 貪污受賄犯罪 量刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn) 原點(diǎn)報(bào)應(yīng) 罪刑階梯 計(jì)贓量刑 刑罰過(guò)剩

【摘要】："數(shù)額+情節(jié)"量刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)雖相比于傳統(tǒng)的"計(jì)贓量刑"模式有一定的進(jìn)步,但無(wú)法完全解決貪污受賄犯罪之量刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的體系性困境。突破這一困境的教義學(xué)路徑在于:立足于報(bào)應(yīng)和預(yù)防的二元刑罰目的觀,認(rèn)真對(duì)待"原點(diǎn)報(bào)應(yīng)+罪刑階梯"的量刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn),其中,原點(diǎn)報(bào)應(yīng)是實(shí)現(xiàn)預(yù)防犯罪之目標(biāo)所需的刑罰量,其不在于架設(shè)罪、責(zé)、刑之間的階梯,而是根據(jù)數(shù)額或情節(jié)對(duì)預(yù)防刑進(jìn)行適度考慮,以免出現(xiàn)懲罰報(bào)應(yīng)帶來(lái)的刑罰過(guò)�，F(xiàn)象。而罪刑階梯的架設(shè),需要重視罰金等財(cái)產(chǎn)刑對(duì)實(shí)現(xiàn)量刑公正的意義。以原點(diǎn)報(bào)應(yīng)實(shí)現(xiàn)犯罪預(yù)防和以財(cái)產(chǎn)刑架設(shè)罪刑階梯,應(yīng)成為貪污賄賂犯罪之法定刑的內(nèi)在標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。
[Abstract]:Although the sentencing standard of "plot of amount" has some progress compared with the traditional mode of "measuring stolen goods and sentencing". However, it can not completely solve the systemic dilemma of sentencing standards for corruption and bribery crimes. The dogmatic path to break through this dilemma lies in the dual purpose view of punishment based on retribution and prevention. Take seriously the sentencing standard of "origin retribution for crime and punishment ladder", in which origin retribution is the amount of penalty needed to achieve the goal of crime prevention, which does not lie in the ladder between setting up crime, responsibility and punishment. But according to the amount or the circumstances of the appropriate consideration of preventive punishment, so as to avoid the phenomenon of excessive punishment brought by punishment retribution, and the erection of the ladder of crime and punishment. It is necessary to pay attention to the significance of property penalty such as fine to realize the justice of sentencing. To realize crime prevention by retribution of origin and to set up punishment ladder by property punishment should become the inherent standard of legal punishment for corruption and bribery crime.
【作者單位】： 南京師范大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：“江蘇高校優(yōu)勢(shì)學(xué)科建設(shè)工程資助項(xiàng)目”(PAPD) 江蘇高校區(qū)域法治發(fā)展協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心項(xiàng)目“法治中國(guó)建設(shè)與區(qū)域法治發(fā)展研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):JCLL14002)的階段性成果 國(guó)家社科基金重點(diǎn)項(xiàng)目“建設(shè)社會(huì)主義法治文化研究”(14AZD144) 司法部委托項(xiàng)目“刑法解釋的基本原理研究”(14SFB4005) 中國(guó)法學(xué)會(huì)項(xiàng)目“刑法修正的理論模型與實(shí)踐研判研究”[CLS(2015)C79]的資助
【分類號(hào)】：D924.392
【正文快照】： 一直以來(lái),貪污受賄犯罪的量刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)問(wèn)題備受爭(zhēng)議。為了矯正貪污受賄犯罪“計(jì)贓論罪”之量刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)過(guò)于機(jī)械化的缺陷,[1]《中華人民共和國(guó)刑法修正案(九)》(以下簡(jiǎn)稱“《刑法修正案(九)》”)對(duì)貪污受賄犯罪采取“數(shù)額+情節(jié)”的定罪量刑模式,并提高了貪污受賄犯罪入罪與量刑的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 yぱ，

本文編號(hào)：1432449