憲法解釋權(quán)性質(zhì)研究
[Abstract]:Constitution is the fundamental law of the country and the "mother law" of various laws and regulations, which determines that the constitution is abstract, general and principled; in addition, the constitution has the highest legal effect in the national legal system, which determines the supreme authority of the constitution, and it must be stable and can not be changed overnight. In order to ensure the implementation of the Constitution, promote its continuous development and maintain its stability, the Constitution must be interpreted. The analysis of the nature of the power of interpretation of the Constitution is of great significance to the effective implementation of the Constitution, the correct understanding of the Constitution and the protection of the authority of the Constitution. In recent years, some cases of infringement of citizens'basic rights have appeared in our country. In these cases, the basic law can not be applied because the basic law is not stipulated in the basic law. At this time, the basic law of constitution is needed. The basic rights of citizens are protected, but in judicial practice, the Constitution does not serve as the direct legal basis for the court to adjudicate cases and has no actual legal effect. The analysis of the nature of the Constitutional Interpretation Power has a far-reaching impact on the implementation and development of the Constitution. However, China has not paid enough attention to the nature of the Constitutional Interpretation Power, and China's Constitutional Interpretation System is far from perfect. This paper analyzes the nature of the power of constitutional interpretation both at home and abroad, analyzes the problems existing in the theory and practice of the power of constitutional interpretation in our country, and puts forward some countermeasures to solve the problems in the light of the relevant experience abroad, in order to benefit the system of constitutional interpretation in our country.
In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this article is divided into four parts.
The first part is the basic theory of the power of constitutional interpretation.Through the analysis of the basic concepts of the power of constitutional interpretation, people can have a deep understanding of the nature of the power of constitutional interpretation in China, redefine the nature of the power of constitutional interpretation, and introduce the nature of the power of constitutional interpretation to the legal application of our constitution. And the further improvement of the constitutional interpretation has certain theoretical significance.
The second part is the introduction of the nature of the power of constitutional interpretation in foreign countries. This part introduces the nature of the power of constitutional interpretation in foreign countries, mainly the horizontal comparison between the nature of the power of constitutional interpretation in foreign countries and in China, which arouses people's thinking about the nature of the power of constitutional interpretation in China. The improvement has certain guiding role in reality.
The third part is through the analysis of the existing typical cases, leads to the problems of the right to interpret the Constitution in China and analyzes these problems. Effective relief, and then make people doubt the authority of our legal system, leading to the threat to our legal system.
The fourth part is about the corresponding measures to improve the nature of the Constitutional Interpretation, including the application of the law, the design of the main body and the procedure of the Constitutional Interpretation. The guarantee has an important influence on the stable and harmonious development of our society.
【學位授予單位】:山西大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2011
【分類號】:D921
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 魏健馨;;美國憲法解釋制度解析——兼論對中國憲法解釋制度的啟示[J];天津法學;2011年03期
2 黃娟;;全國人大與其常委會立法權(quán)沖突的現(xiàn)實出路[J];求實;2011年07期
3 包金玉;;我國憲法司法化探討[J];前沿;2011年15期
4 齊冠軍;李立強;;防止我國憲法司法化的必要性[J];山西省政法管理干部學院學報;2011年03期
5 ;[J];;年期
6 ;[J];;年期
7 ;[J];;年期
8 ;[J];;年期
9 ;[J];;年期
10 ;[J];;年期
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前8條
1 本報記者李新會;憲法解釋是憲法實施的重要保障[N];法制日報;2002年
2 吳酩;香港不適宜馬上采取普選[N];人民日報海外版;2004年
3 中國政法大學教授 焦洪昌;憲法的性質(zhì)[N];人民法院報;2001年
4 本報記者 樂欣;憲法權(quán)利不是空中樓閣[N];檢察日報;2002年
5 顧元;西方國家的憲法解釋機制[N];學習時報;2000年
6 ;把握良好契機 推進法治建設(shè)[N];21世紀經(jīng)濟報道;2003年
7 任進;建立憲法訴訟制度 推進憲法規(guī)范實施[N];檢察日報;2001年
8 本報專稿 艾櫟楠;美政治進入少數(shù)族裔盛開期[N];世界報;2009年
相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前10條
1 趙佩佩;憲法解釋權(quán)性質(zhì)研究[D];山西大學;2011年
2 張潔;論憲法解釋權(quán)的主體[D];吉林大學;2011年
3 田川;我國憲法解釋制度問題研究[D];河北大學;2010年
4 黨沖;論我國憲法解釋制度的完善[D];山西大學;2012年
5 耿紫陽;俄羅斯憲法解釋制度研究[D];山東大學;2010年
6 位敏;俄羅斯聯(lián)邦憲法解釋制度研究[D];鄭州大學;2012年
7 許傲雪;建立和完善我國的憲法解釋制度[D];鄭州大學;2007年
8 郝靜;憲法解釋權(quán)比較研究[D];天津師范大學;2008年
9 王玉榮;我國違憲審查制度的現(xiàn)狀及完善[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學;2012年
10 張紅利;論我國憲法私有財產(chǎn)權(quán)保護的發(fā)展與完善[D];中央民族大學;2010年
,本文編號:2219201
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xianfalw/2219201.html