本文選題：齊玉苓 + 公民��； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：2001年6月28日,最高人民法院公布并實(shí)行了《最高人民法院關(guān)于以侵犯姓名權(quán)的手段侵犯憲法保護(hù)的公民的受教育的基本權(quán)利是否承擔(dān)民事責(zé)任的批復(fù)》�？隙岁悤早饕郧址感彰麢�(quán)的方式侵犯了齊玉受憲法保護(hù)的受教育權(quán)。然而,2008年12月18日,最高人民法院明確廢止了前面的批復(fù)�！褒R玉苓案”早已塵埃落定,各界的爭(zhēng)論聲仍小絕于耳。然而透過(guò)這么一個(gè)小案件所折射出的公民受教育權(quán)的保護(hù)問(wèn)題,各界似乎少有提及。該案所引起的關(guān)于我國(guó)憲法司法化的思考固然發(fā)人深省,但一個(gè)普通的民事案件,最高人民法院特意為此作出司法解釋,還得勞煩憲法的大駕,才能為齊玉苓討回公道。由此不得不引起我們的思考：面對(duì)現(xiàn)實(shí)中種種公民受教育權(quán)遭到侵犯、公民受教育權(quán)得不到平等對(duì)待的現(xiàn)狀.這個(gè)時(shí)候我們應(yīng)該怎么辦?公民的受教育權(quán)是憲法賦予的五一項(xiàng)基本社會(huì)文化權(quán)利,平等應(yīng)該是其第一要義。齊玉苓案不僅僅應(yīng)該引起我們關(guān)于憲法是不是應(yīng)該司法化的思考,更為重要的,是要引起我們對(duì)我國(guó)公民受教育權(quán)現(xiàn)狀及如何平等保護(hù)我國(guó)公民的受教育權(quán)的反思。本文借“齊玉等案”,探討我國(guó)公民受教育權(quán)保護(hù)過(guò)程中所遇到的問(wèn)題和原因。第一章陳述了“齊玉苓案”的案情,簡(jiǎn)要的介紹學(xué)界關(guān)于“齊玉苓案”的討論情況,從而引出“齊玉苓案”帶給我們的思考和啟示。第二章闡述公民受教育權(quán)的基本含義并論證平等保護(hù)公民受教育權(quán)的重要意義。第三章簡(jiǎn)要的說(shuō)明我國(guó)公民受教育權(quán)實(shí)現(xiàn)的現(xiàn)狀。第四章是本文的重點(diǎn)部分,重在解構(gòu)我國(guó)公民受教育權(quán)所面臨的一些主要問(wèn)題,包括立法上、司法上、行政上等。第五章是本文的最后一章,是基于前面四個(gè)部分的闡述、分析得出的一些結(jié)論,是本人對(duì)我國(guó)保護(hù)公民受教育權(quán)的途徑所做的一些思考。
[Abstract]:On June 28, 2001, the Supreme people's Court promulgated and carried out the "Supreme people's Court's approval on whether the basic right to education of the citizens protected by the Constitution should be infringed by the means of infringing the right to name". Chen Xiaoqi infringed the right to education protected by the Constitution in the way of infringing her right to name. However, on December 18, 2008, the Supreme people's Court expressly annulled the previous approval. Qi Yuling case has long been settled, the controversy of all walks of life is still quiet in the ear. However, the protection of citizens' right to education reflected in such a small case seems to be rarely mentioned. The thinking about the judicature of our constitution caused by this case is certainly thought-provoking, but in an ordinary civil case, the Supreme people's Court has made a special judicial interpretation for this, and has to bother the Constitution to obtain justice for Qi Yuling. Therefore, we have to think about the fact that the right of citizens to receive education is infringed and the right to education is not treated equally in reality. What should we do at this time? The citizen's right to education is a basic social and cultural right given by the Constitution, and equality should be its first meaning. Qi Yuling's case should not only cause us to think about whether the constitution should be judicialized, but also, more importantly, cause us to reflect on the present situation of our citizens' right to education and how to protect our citizens' right to education equally. This paper discusses the problems and reasons in the process of protecting the right to education of Chinese citizens by the case of Qi Yu. The first chapter states the case of Qi Yuling and briefly introduces the discussion of Qi Yuling case in academic circles, which leads to the thinking and inspiration brought by Qi Yuling case. The second chapter expounds the basic meaning of citizen's right to education and demonstrates the significance of equal protection of citizen's right to education. The third chapter briefly describes the status quo of the realization of the right to education of Chinese citizens. The fourth chapter is the focus of this paper, focusing on the deconstruction of the right to education of Chinese citizens facing some major problems, including legislation, judicial, administrative, and so on. The fifth chapter is the last chapter of this paper, which is based on the previous four parts of the elaboration, the analysis of some conclusions, the author of our country to protect the right to education of citizens to do some thinking.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D921

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 葉遠(yuǎn)濤;憲法基本權(quán)利視角下的異地高考政策研究[D];華南理工大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：1919980