【摘要】：隨著現(xiàn)代化科學(xué)技術(shù)的高速發(fā)展,視聽資料作為不可或缺的重要證據(jù)角色出現(xiàn)在民事審判當(dāng)中,而對(duì)于私錄視聽資料的證據(jù)合法性問題卻一直被理論界與實(shí)務(wù)界所廣泛熱議。對(duì)此,世界各國采取不同的措施。有的國家通過修改原來的相關(guān)法律對(duì)視聽資料的證據(jù)采納規(guī)則進(jìn)行調(diào)整,有的國家則通過制定新的采納規(guī)范來調(diào)整相應(yīng)的判斷規(guī)則。根據(jù)世界各國的立法現(xiàn)狀來看,對(duì)視聽資料持承認(rèn)的觀點(diǎn)是大多數(shù)國家普遍的做法。而我國的《民事訴訟法》則將視聽資料作為一種獨(dú)立的證據(jù)類型,這種做法與世界各國的做法相比可謂是獨(dú)具一格。同時(shí)隨著科技的不斷發(fā)展,在實(shí)務(wù)中錄音、錄像資料的應(yīng)用與制作也越來越普及,私錄視聽資料在民事訴訟領(lǐng)域的出現(xiàn)也逐漸普遍,將視聽資料作為證據(jù)提交法庭成為如今當(dāng)事人的一種選擇趨勢。而就目前所查閱的與私錄視聽資料有關(guān)的相關(guān)法律所規(guī)定,三個(gè)最高法的司法解釋對(duì)于如何審查私錄視聽資料的證據(jù)合法性提出了不同層次不同方面的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),同時(shí)也呈現(xiàn)了不同程度上制度的缺陷和評(píng)判標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的不一致。然而隨著科技的快速發(fā)展,私錄視聽資料在民事訴訟領(lǐng)域的應(yīng)用越來越廣泛,現(xiàn)行的立法規(guī)定顯然無法適應(yīng)司法實(shí)務(wù)領(lǐng)域中對(duì)于私錄視聽資料的證據(jù)合法性判斷面臨的困境,因此我們亟需完善相關(guān)立法規(guī)定,明確私錄視聽資料的證據(jù)合法性,并對(duì)于私錄視聽資料的證據(jù)能力規(guī)則進(jìn)行界定,從而實(shí)現(xiàn)法律的正義和法的規(guī)范。本文就是從我國民事訴訟領(lǐng)域私錄視聽資料的不同的理論制度基礎(chǔ)的缺陷以及司法實(shí)踐中面臨的審查困境為切入點(diǎn),以某地法院的真實(shí)案例為基點(diǎn)對(duì)私錄視聽資料進(jìn)行科學(xué)的分類,有的放矢。在借鑒、吸收國外一些國家和地區(qū)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)我國民事訴訟領(lǐng)域私錄視聽資料的制度的發(fā)展變化進(jìn)行探討,對(duì)其規(guī)定由“窄”至“寬”的制度選擇背后的價(jià)值取向分析,并針對(duì)寬泛解釋帶來的空間弊端進(jìn)行探究,以期對(duì)私錄視聽資料的相關(guān)理論制度基礎(chǔ)進(jìn)行完善,并以真實(shí)案例為依托有針對(duì)性地提出相關(guān)切實(shí)可行的制度完善建議,對(duì)原則性的規(guī)定具體化并且對(duì)于一些特別規(guī)定具體分析分類,從而實(shí)現(xiàn)對(duì)于司法實(shí)踐中的統(tǒng)一性與規(guī)范性。筆者希望經(jīng)過上述的探討與分析,使得民事訴訟領(lǐng)域中對(duì)于私錄視聽資料的證據(jù)合法性的審判標(biāo)準(zhǔn)得以規(guī)范化,為我國民事訴訟制度的理論完善與法律的進(jìn)步貢獻(xiàn)微薄的力量。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of modern science and technology, audio-visual materials, as an indispensable and important role of evidence, appear in the civil trial, but the legality of the evidence of privately recorded audio-visual materials has been widely discussed in the theoretical and practical circles. In this regard, different countries in the world have taken different measures. Some countries adjust the rules of evidence admission of audio-visual materials by amending the original relevant laws, while others adjust the corresponding rules of judgment by formulating new rules of adoption. According to the current legislative situation in the world, the recognition of audio-visual materials is a common practice in most countries. However, the Civil procedure Law of our country regards audio-visual materials as an independent type of evidence, which is unique compared with the practices of all countries in the world. At the same time, with the continuous development of science and technology, the application and production of audio and video materials are becoming more and more popular in practice, and the emergence of private audio-visual materials in the field of civil litigation is becoming more and more common. It has become a trend of choice for the parties to submit audio-visual materials as evidence to the court. According to the relevant laws related to the private recording of audio-visual materials, the judicial interpretation of the three supreme laws puts forward different levels and different standards for how to examine the legality of the evidence of privately recorded audio-visual materials, and at the same time presents the defects of the system and the inconsistency of the evaluation criteria in different degrees. However, with the rapid development of science and technology, the application of privately recorded audio-visual materials in the field of civil litigation is becoming more and more extensive. The current legislative provisions obviously can not adapt to the difficulties faced by the judgment of the legality of privately recorded audio-visual materials in the field of judicial practice. Therefore, we urgently need to improve the relevant legislative provisions, clarify the legality of evidence for privately recorded audio-visual materials, and define the rules of evidentiary ability of privately recorded audio-visual materials. In order to realize the justice of law and the norms of law. This paper is based on the defects of different theoretical and institutional bases of privately recorded audio-visual materials in the field of civil litigation in our country and the examination predicament faced in judicial practice, and makes a scientific classification of privately recorded audio-visual materials on the basis of the real cases of a certain court. On the basis of drawing lessons from and absorbing the experience of some foreign countries and regions, this paper probes into the development and changes of the system of recording audio-visual materials privately in the field of civil litigation in our country, analyzes the value orientation behind the choice of the system from "narrow" to "wide", and probes into the spatial malpractice caused by the broad interpretation, in order to perfect the relevant theoretical and institutional basis of the private recording of audio-visual materials. Based on the real cases, this paper puts forward some feasible suggestions for perfecting the system, concrete the provisions of principle and analyzing and classifying some special provisions, so as to realize the unity and standardization in judicial practice. The author hopes that through the above discussion and analysis, the trial standard of the legality of the evidence for the private recording of audio-visual materials in the field of civil litigation can be standardized, and contribute a meagre force to the theoretical improvement of the civil litigation system and the progress of the law in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D925.13

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳明生,王韶許;淺論視聽資料在民事訴訟中的運(yùn)用——兼評(píng)私錄視聽資料的合法性[J];成都教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期

2 鄭雷;黃魁瓊;;論監(jiān)聽措施的法律構(gòu)建[J];晟典律師評(píng)論;2005年01期

3 徐晶;論監(jiān)聽作為取證手段的法律問題[J];重慶郵電學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年05期

4 文庭婷;王萬宇;;論電子證據(jù)的種類歸屬[J];重慶電子工程職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年Z1期

5 韓成軍;;論檢察機(jī)關(guān)職務(wù)犯罪偵查中竊聽措施的法律規(guī)制[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2011年06期

6 杜建民;刑事數(shù)字影像證據(jù)問題研究[J];福建公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2004年04期

7 張學(xué)文;;論視頻資料之獨(dú)立證據(jù)地位——兼談視聽資料法定形式的細(xì)化[J];福建警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年06期

8 吳培;魏靜蘭;;新聞采訪中私錄視聽資料的證據(jù)效力研究[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年09期

9 方配禮;;對(duì)有關(guān)“高科技證據(jù)材料”的證據(jù)法用語綜述與評(píng)價(jià)——以法律語言學(xué)為視角[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年17期

10 許志;;關(guān)于監(jiān)聽的幾個(gè)基本理論問題之探討[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年32期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 張春霞;限制與保護(hù)：刑事訴訟中的隱私權(quán)[D];四川大學(xué);2005年

2 張凱;電子證據(jù)研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2006年

3 郭金霞;鑒定結(jié)論適用中的問題與對(duì)策研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2008年

4 任學(xué)強(qiáng);腐敗犯罪特殊訴訟程序研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2010年

5 尚華;論質(zhì)證[D];中國政法大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 唐河林;我國電子證據(jù)立法問題研究[D];華南理工大學(xué);2010年

2 賀建勇;試論我國民事訴訟視聽資料證據(jù)效力[D];南昌大學(xué);2011年

3 李小愷;云計(jì)算環(huán)境下計(jì)算機(jī)偵查取證問題研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2011年

4 牛博超;電子證據(jù)的收集與保全[D];太原科技大學(xué);2011年

5 張黎;監(jiān)聽制度研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2010年

6 吳欣天;電子證據(jù)若干問題研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2010年

7 王敏;民事訴訟法視野下電子證據(jù)法律制度研究[D];山東大學(xué);2011年

8 李瑩;刑事科學(xué)證據(jù)研究[D];山東大學(xué);2011年

9 陳書凱;民事訴訟中電子證據(jù)若干問題研究[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2011年

10 張楠;論秘密錄音的證據(jù)能力[D];南京師范大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：2499420