【摘要】：隨著社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)的不斷向前發(fā)展,社會(huì)管理模式的不斷變革,國(guó)家行政主體享有的行政權(quán)也在不斷地?cái)U(kuò)大,抽象行政行為已然逐步的深入到我們生活的各個(gè)方面,自然而然的對(duì)于抽象行政不作為來(lái)說(shuō),其所產(chǎn)生的侵害我們合法權(quán)益的案件,也會(huì)越發(fā)增加,現(xiàn)有體制對(duì)于抽象行政不作為案件,仍然缺乏非常有效的監(jiān)督,造成了監(jiān)督缺位的現(xiàn)象。從司法層面來(lái)講,理論界一直主張?zhí)接懡⒊橄笮姓蛔鳛榘讣V,并且分析建立的理論基礎(chǔ)、現(xiàn)實(shí)性、可行性等等。但是一項(xiàng)法律制度的建立,也不是一蹴而就的,需要“循規(guī)蹈矩,因地制宜”,因而2015年我國(guó)《行政訴訟法》經(jīng)過(guò)修改,雖未明確建立抽象行政行為之訴,卻明文規(guī)定了對(duì)抽象行政行為司法審查這一內(nèi)容,雖然對(duì)于該司法審查,遺憾的來(lái)講,并未納入行政行為的受案范圍,但是從一定程度上講,也可以將其視為抽象行政不作為進(jìn)入司法訴訟領(lǐng)域的新動(dòng)向和新發(fā)展,邁開了建立抽象行政行為訴訟制度的第一步。本文先從抽象行政不作為的概念、構(gòu)成要件、分類、以及特征這一部分進(jìn)行闡述,這樣可以讓我們很好先從實(shí)質(zhì)上去理解把握抽象行政不作為案件背后的司法理論。其次將主要闡述,當(dāng)前《行政訴訟法》立法上對(duì)于抽象行政不作為的救濟(jì)途徑即司法上的附帶審查的規(guī)定、表現(xiàn)出的特征以及存在的爭(zhēng)議和原告資格存在的問(wèn)題等內(nèi)容,著重探究了建立抽象行政訴訟,尤其是抽象行政不作為訴訟的理論基礎(chǔ)、現(xiàn)實(shí)性、緊迫性等內(nèi)容。最后根據(jù)當(dāng)前的立法規(guī)定,以及行政立法改革的發(fā)展趨勢(shì),表達(dá)了個(gè)人的理解和看法,像抽象行政不作為納入行政訴訟受案范圍,擴(kuò)大審查范圍,逐步建立附帶審查為主控訴性審查為輔的審查模式、擴(kuò)大審查權(quán)能,建立抽象行政公益訴訟,明確原告資格等。抽象行政行為作為管理國(guó)家的一種常態(tài)形式,無(wú)論從法治理論還是法治實(shí)踐來(lái)說(shuō),都應(yīng)當(dāng)?shù)玫接行У乇O(jiān)督和完善,盡管目前行政立法只是限定在了規(guī)章以外的抽象行政文件上,但相信結(jié)合我國(guó)不斷發(fā)展的國(guó)情和法治狀況,必將進(jìn)行不斷地發(fā)展,建立起抽象行政行為作為不作為之訴。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of social economy and the continuous change of social management mode, the administrative power enjoyed by the main body of state administration is also constantly expanding, and abstract administrative acts have gradually penetrated into all aspects of our lives. Naturally, for abstract administrative inaction, the cases that infringe on our legitimate rights and interests will also increase more and more, and the existing system will also increase the cases of abstract administrative omission. There is still a lack of very effective supervision, resulting in the absence of supervision. From the judicial point of view, the theoretical circle has always advocated the establishment of abstract administrative omission cases, and analyzes the theoretical basis, reality, feasibility and so on. However, the establishment of a legal system is not achieved overnight, and it needs to be "in accordance with the rules and according to local conditions". Therefore, the Administrative procedure Law of our country was amended in 2015, although the lawsuit of abstract administrative acts has not been clearly established, but it explicitly stipulates the content of judicial review of abstract administrative acts. Although for the judicial review, unfortunately, it is not included in the scope of accepting cases of administrative acts, but to a certain extent, It can also be regarded as a new trend and development of abstract administrative omission in the field of judicial litigation, and the first step in establishing the litigation system of abstract administrative act is taken. This paper first expounds the concept, constituent elements, classification and characteristics of abstract administrative omission, so that we can understand and grasp the judicial theory behind the case of abstract administrative omission. Secondly, it mainly expounds the relief way of abstract administrative omission in the legislation of Administrative procedure Law, that is, the stipulation of judicial collateral review, the characteristics and the existing disputes and the problems existing in plaintiff qualification, and focuses on the theoretical basis, reality and urgency of establishing abstract administrative litigation, especially abstract administrative omission litigation. Finally, according to the current legislative provisions and the development trend of administrative legislation reform, this paper expresses personal understanding and views, such as abstract administrative omission into the scope of accepting cases in administrative litigation, expanding the scope of examination, gradually establishing the examination mode supplemented by collateral review, expanding the power of examination, establishing abstract administrative public interest litigation, and defining the qualification of plaintiffs, etc. Abstract administrative act, as a normal form of management of the country, should be effectively supervised and improved both in terms of the theory of the rule of law and the practice of the rule of law. Although the current administrative legislation is only limited to abstract administrative documents other than regulations, it is believed that combined with the continuous development of the national conditions and the situation of the rule of law in our country, it will continue to develop and establish whether the abstract administrative act should be regarded as a lawsuit.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王娟;;行政訴訟法修改視角下的抽象行政行為司法審查[J];天水行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年04期

2 王世濤;劉雨嫣;;抽象行政行為司法審查制度設(shè)計(jì)的規(guī)范分析[J];青海社會(huì)科學(xué);2016年01期

3 余凌云;;論行政訴訟法的修改[J];清華法學(xué);2014年03期

4 張曉艷;;有關(guān)行政不作為問(wèn)題的探究[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年10期

5 李洪雷;;中國(guó)行政訴訟制度發(fā)展的新路向[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2013年01期

6 姜明安;;擴(kuò)大受案范圍是行政訴訟法修改的重頭戲[J];廣東社會(huì)科學(xué);2013年01期

7 于立深;;行政立法不作為研究[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2011年02期

8 關(guān)保英;;論行政不作為的訴權(quán)范疇[J];法律適用;2010年04期

9 張素華;;論行政不作為侵權(quán)的責(zé)任承擔(dān)——以三鹿奶粉事件為中心的研究[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2010年02期

10 羅許生;;論抽象行政不作為侵權(quán)及其法律救濟(jì)[J];海南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉宏博;行政不作為訴訟研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2015年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 薛樂(lè)樂(lè);論行政不作為的司法救濟(jì)[D];鄭州大學(xué);2015年

2 張曉明;行政不作為的司法救濟(jì)[D];山東大學(xué);2012年

3 李艷萍;試論抽象行政不作為[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2005年

4 孔萍;論行政不作為的司法救濟(jì)[D];蘇州大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：2497606