從perfect 10v. Google案看臨時禁令申請中的利益衡量——兼評我國《民事訴訟法修正案》第21條之規(guī)定
發(fā)布時間：2019-06-11 23:08
【摘要】：2012年《民事訴訟法修正案》第21條增加了訴訟中臨時阻斷侵害行為的規(guī)定。但是,僅僅因為一方的行為給另一方造成損害就準(zhǔn)予保全的規(guī)定容易導(dǎo)致制度被濫用。立法應(yīng)當(dāng)充分認(rèn)識到不同保全制度的特性以及它們給當(dāng)事人帶來的影響,在此基礎(chǔ)上設(shè)置不同的審查機制。有關(guān)訴訟中臨時阻斷侵害行為的保全命令,只能在對申請人、被申請人和公共利益等各方利益進行權(quán)衡之后才能做出。
[Abstract]:Article 21 of the 2012 Amendment to the Civil procedure Law added provisions for temporary blocking of violations in proceedings. However, the requirement that preservation is granted simply because one party's actions cause harm to the other can easily lead to abuse of the system. Legislation should fully recognize the characteristics of different preservation systems and their impact on the parties, on the basis of which different review mechanisms should be set up. The preservation order of temporary blocking infringement in litigation can only be made after weighing the interests of the applicant, the respondent and the public interest.
【作者單位】： 天津師范大學(xué);
【分類號】：D925.1
[Abstract]:Article 21 of the 2012 Amendment to the Civil procedure Law added provisions for temporary blocking of violations in proceedings. However, the requirement that preservation is granted simply because one party's actions cause harm to the other can easily lead to abuse of the system. Legislation should fully recognize the characteristics of different preservation systems and their impact on the parties, on the basis of which different review mechanisms should be set up. The preservation order of temporary blocking infringement in litigation can only be made after weighing the interests of the applicant, the respondent and the public interest.
【作者單位】： 天津師范大學(xué);
【分類號】：D925.1
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳瑩;;我國行為保全制度的建構(gòu)[J];廈門大學(xué)法律評論;2006年01期
2 郭小冬;;論訴訟保全中的利益權(quán)衡問題[J];西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2009年06期
3 赫U，
本文編號：2497529
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2497529.html
