發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-04-10 18:26

【摘要】：自認(rèn)的效力是指在民事訴訟過程中，經(jīng)當(dāng)事人承認(rèn)的于己不利的事實(shí)，無(wú)需對(duì)方當(dāng)事人舉證，也無(wú)需法院依職權(quán)調(diào)查其真實(shí)性就能對(duì)當(dāng)事人和法院產(chǎn)生拘束力，，限制爭(zhēng)執(zhí)及舉證的范圍。承認(rèn)自認(rèn)的效力是自認(rèn)人自由意志、充分表達(dá)自己意愿和自由處分自己權(quán)利的體現(xiàn)，有助于弱化法官職權(quán)，強(qiáng)化當(dāng)事人主體地位，促進(jìn)我國(guó)民事訴訟模式由職權(quán)主義向當(dāng)事人主義轉(zhuǎn)變；也有利于簡(jiǎn)化訴訟程序，提高訴訟效率，充分利用有限的司法資源。但依據(jù)現(xiàn)有法律運(yùn)用自認(rèn)效力規(guī)則會(huì)產(chǎn)生一系列問題，需對(duì)相關(guān)規(guī)則進(jìn)行完善。民事訴訟過程中，由于自認(rèn)在法定情形下可以被撤銷的，會(huì)導(dǎo)致筆錄前后不一致，因此，可以對(duì)當(dāng)事人自認(rèn)事實(shí)單獨(dú)制成筆錄，將它與一般的庭審筆錄區(qū)分開來。最高人民法院《證據(jù)規(guī)定》第八條第四款、第七十四條對(duì)自認(rèn)撤銷的規(guī)定存在不一致，這會(huì)導(dǎo)致適用法律的不確定性，容易引起混亂，需要立法統(tǒng)一其規(guī)定。我國(guó)更傾向職權(quán)主義模式的民事訴訟模式影響自認(rèn)效力的發(fā)揮，而當(dāng)事人主義模式是自認(rèn)規(guī)則存在的理想環(huán)境，所以要從根本上轉(zhuǎn)變?cè)V訟模式。
[Abstract]:The effect of self-admission means that in the course of civil litigation, the facts admitted by the parties against themselves do not need to be proved by the other party, nor is it necessary for the court to investigate its authenticity ex officio so as to have a binding force on the parties and the court. Limit the scope of disputes and proof. Recognition of the effect of self-admission is the embodiment of the free will of the self-confessed person, the full expression of his will and the free disposition of his rights, which helps to weaken the power of the judge and strengthen the subject position of the parties concerned. To promote the transformation of civil litigation mode from functional doctrine to party doctrine in our country; It is also beneficial to simplify the procedure, improve the efficiency of litigation and make full use of limited judicial resources. However, according to the existing laws, there will be a series of problems in the application of the self-admission effect rules, which need to be perfected. In the process of civil litigation, because the admission can be revoked under the legal circumstances, it will cause the inconsistency of the transcript. Therefore, the self-confessed facts of the litigants can be made into separate transcripts, which can be distinguished from the ordinary court transcripts. There are inconsistencies in Article 8, paragraph 4, and Article 74 of the Supreme people's Court on the withdrawal of self-admission, which will lead to uncertainty in the application of the law and easily lead to confusion, requiring legislation to unify its provisions. In our country, the mode of civil litigation, which is more inclined to the mode of professional doctrine, affects the exertion of self-admission, and the adversarial model is the ideal environment for the existence of self-admission rules, so it is necessary to fundamentally change the mode of litigation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：暨南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 陳錦紅;對(duì)民事訴訟自認(rèn)規(guī)則的思考[J];法學(xué)雜志;2005年01期

2 陳錦紅;論民事訴訟自認(rèn)規(guī)則的完善[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年06期

3 廖永安;胡軍輝;;試論民事訴訟中的擬制自認(rèn)[J];海南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年04期

4 劉學(xué)在;辯論主義的根據(jù)[J];法學(xué)研究;2005年04期

5 楊秀清;;論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán)訴訟中自認(rèn)的限制性規(guī)則[J];南京師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年03期

本文編號(hào)：2456023