【摘要】：在大數(shù)據(jù)時(shí)代,物理空間與數(shù)據(jù)空間對(duì)接后,個(gè)人行為和生活細(xì)節(jié)被數(shù)據(jù)化,這些海量的碎片化數(shù)據(jù)不涉及識(shí)別公民個(gè)人信息記錄,依靠人力很難找出其潛在的相關(guān)性,而挖掘技術(shù)卻能將這些毫無(wú)關(guān)聯(lián)的元數(shù)據(jù)整合成隱私信息,讓個(gè)人生活軌跡變得"透明"。在傳統(tǒng)法律的框架下,這些隱私證據(jù)遭遇不能以非法證據(jù)排除的實(shí)務(wù)尷尬和理論尷尬。為了將隱私證據(jù)的危害降低到社會(huì)可接受的程度,亟須研究大數(shù)據(jù)時(shí)代挖掘隱私證據(jù)的可采性原則,以期構(gòu)建"網(wǎng)眼"熟人社會(huì)下的良性秩序與可容忍的隱私觀,推動(dòng)人類(lèi)數(shù)字文明時(shí)代的法治進(jìn)步。
[Abstract]:In the era of big data, after the physical space and data space were docked, personal behavior and life details were digitized. These massive fragmented data did not involve the identification of citizens' personal information records, and it was difficult to find out their potential relevance by manpower. However, mining technology can integrate these irrelevant metadata into privacy information, and make the personal life trajectory transparent. In the framework of traditional law, these privacy evidence encounter practical embarrassment and theoretical embarrassment that can not be excluded by illegal evidence. In order to reduce the harm of privacy evidence to a socially acceptable level, it is imperative to study the admissibility principle of mining privacy evidence in big data's era, with a view to constructing a benign order and tolerable privacy view under the "mesh" acquaintance society. To promote the rule of law in the era of human digital civilization.
【作者單位】： 中南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)刑事司法學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金項(xiàng)目“大數(shù)據(jù)時(shí)代電子文件的證據(jù)規(guī)則與管理法制建設(shè)研究”(16BFX033)
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 郭志遠(yuǎn);;監(jiān)聽(tīng)立法:比較法視野的考察——兼論我國(guó)監(jiān)聽(tīng)立法之完善[J];科技與法律;2006年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張俏睿;我國(guó)無(wú)證搜查法律適用問(wèn)題研究[D];中國(guó)青年政治學(xué)院;2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：2455893