本文關(guān)鍵詞：論惡意訴訟及其法律規(guī)制，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。

文檔介紹：
對外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文論惡意訴訟及其法律規(guī)制姓名:任華申請學(xué)位級別:碩士專業(yè):法律·民商法指導(dǎo)教師:蘇號朋 20071001 摘要在本文引言部分,筆者指出惡意訴訟與民事訴訟相伴而生。民事訴訟被視為人們維護(hù)合法權(quán)益和解決爭議的最重要手段,其價值與作用在我們的社會生活中得到了相當(dāng)?shù)捏w現(xiàn)。同時,由于種種原因,惡意訴訟現(xiàn)象與問題也越來越多,這不僅嚴(yán)重侵害了特定法律主體的合法權(quán)益、浪費司法資源和擾亂訴訟秩序,也對司法公正和訴訟價值構(gòu)成了沖擊與損害。惡意訴訟已受到一定的重視,但人們對其認(rèn)識還比較缺乏,本文旨在通過對惡意訴訟相關(guān)問題研究,以求有效規(guī)制惡意訴訟之方案。本文正文共分為四個部分:第一部分論述惡意訴訟的含義及其與相關(guān)概念的區(qū)別,通過惡意訴訟行為的法理分析,指出惡意訴訟的性質(zhì)具備兩重性:其一、惡意訴訟行為違背訴訟目的或訴權(quán)正當(dāng)行使的界限,是一種不正當(dāng)?shù)脑V訟行為;其二、惡意訴訟行為因為主觀存在惡意或故意,所實施的行為侵害了對方當(dāng)事人的正當(dāng)權(quán)益,又是一種侵權(quán)行為。通過與其他概念的辨析比較,得出惡意訴訟與濫用訴訟權(quán)利、訴訟欺詐這些概念不可等同。第二部分通過對惡意訴訟的成因分析,指出:訴訟具有負(fù)面效應(yīng)、不法利益或非法目的驅(qū)動、個體法律知識與法律觀念存在差異以及我國現(xiàn)行法律制度存在缺陷是造成惡意訴訟日益增多的主要原因。第三部分通過對兩***系對惡意訴訟規(guī)制的比較研究,得出有效規(guī)制惡意訴訟行為需要借鑒外國的成功經(jīng)驗,對其進(jìn)行實體法與程序法的雙重規(guī)制。第四部分主要針對我國惡意訴訟的法律規(guī)制體系提出了規(guī)制手段和立法建議:其一、在民事訴訟法中確立規(guī)制惡意訴訟的誠實信用原則;其二、確立規(guī)制惡意訴訟的侵權(quán)損害賠償責(zé)任制度。在本文結(jié)語中,筆者認(rèn)為在我國法律地惡意訴訟進(jìn)行具體規(guī)定之前,應(yīng)當(dāng)根據(jù)現(xiàn)有民事實體法與程序法的規(guī)定,對惡意訴訟積極處理,不斷積累經(jīng)驗,在不遠(yuǎn)的將來實現(xiàn)對惡意訴訟的有效規(guī)制。關(guān)鍵詞:惡意訴訟誠實信用侵權(quán)行為法律規(guī)制 ABSTRACT Inthe in訂oducfion ofthearticle,the authorindicatesthatmalicious prosecution appears together 1)l,i血ci“l(fā)litigation.Wi山its value and functionapparently revealed in our sociallife.civillitigation isregarded船the most important re@arts ofprotecting people’S lawfulri曲ts and interestsand solving disputes.For variousreasons,more and mole malicious prosecution casgs haveappeared andcausedmany problems.which is a seriousinfiingement ofthelawfulrightsandinterestsofthespecific legalbody,a waste ofjudicial resources,a disturbance ofthecivilprocedule,an impact on thevalueof litigation,and abreach ofthejudicialjustice.People havebegun topay attention to maliciousprosecution butstilllack aclearideaofit.ThiSarticleanalyses thequestiOIlS related tomaliciousprosecution inorder toformulate aplan toeriectivelylegulate maliciousprosecution. 111emain body ofthearticleiSdividedintofourparts.In thefirstpart.the author elabomtes themeaning ofmalicious prosecution and thedifference between itand relatedconcepts such astheabuse ofprocedural fights andlitigation fraud.Besides. through thelegal analysis ofthe actofmaliciousprosecution,the authorindicates that malicious prosecution hastwo characters.First,it iSan incorrectlitigation actbecause has gone against thepurpose oflitigation or gone beyond thelimitoftheproper exerciseofthelitigiousright.Second,it is a丑act oftort because ithasinfringed on the iustrights andinterests oftheotherlitigant out ofsubjective malice ordeliberation.In thesecond part,by analyzing thecall∞ofmaliciousprosecution,the authorindicates thatmaliciousprosecution isdrivenbyillegal interests orpurposes andhas anegative effectand thatthedifferentknowledge levelof individuals aboutthelaw and thedefeet illChina’S current legal system arethe maincauses oftheincreasing cases ofmalicious prosecution.In the third pan,paring theregulatiOIlS ofthetwomajor law systems onmaliciousprosecution,the es to theconclusion that inorder to eriectively regulate maliciousprosecution,we shoulddraw on ESSfulexperience of other COWltries and adopt adouble legulafjon bining substantiallaw and procedural 1

1

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：論惡意訴訟及其法律規(guī)制，，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。