【摘要】：監(jiān)聽作為一種特殊的偵查手段,利用技術手段破除現(xiàn)代犯罪的偵查障礙,能使偵查機關更有效的偵破案件、及時發(fā)現(xiàn)犯罪事實真相和及時懲罰犯罪,提高偵查機關對犯罪分子進行監(jiān)控和追蹤的效率,有助于預防、制止和懲治犯罪。此外,監(jiān)聽又是一把雙刃利劍,如果運用得當,其準確性、經濟性和高效性能使其成為一把滌蕩罪惡的正義之劍；如果胡亂揮舞,其秘密性、侵犯性和強制性將使其成為一把面目猙獰的邪惡之劍。如果監(jiān)聽的運用缺乏程序控制,監(jiān)聽的運用很可能會侵犯公民的隱私權、言論自由權、通信自由權,更甚者還會造成民眾的恐慌和社會秩序的混亂。因此,如何保障被監(jiān)聽人的權利,防止公權力的濫用,對監(jiān)聽行為加以程序上的控制,便成為監(jiān)聽制度建構中的重中之重。 本文以監(jiān)聽偵查現(xiàn)狀概述為切入點,從監(jiān)聽的產生和發(fā)展再到當前的實踐,通過對不同國家和地區(qū)監(jiān)聽制度的分析和比較研究,提出我國刑事訴訟體制中現(xiàn)存的關于監(jiān)聽的立法缺陷,繼而分析了監(jiān)聽手段在我國存在的合理性和對其進行程序保障的緊迫性,并闡述了監(jiān)聽法治化的必要性。希望在懲罰犯罪與保障人權之間、在程序公正與偵查效率之間取得平衡,并對我國刑事訴訟程序,對監(jiān)聽的程序保障方面提出立法建議,尋求簡捷、明確、細化有實際操作性的配套程序。
[Abstract]:As a special means of investigation, surveillance can break down the obstacles of modern crime investigation by means of technical means, so that the investigation organs can detect cases more effectively, discover the truth of the crime in time and punish the crime in time. It is helpful to prevent, suppress and punish the crime by improving the efficiency of the surveillance and tracing of criminals by the investigation organs. In addition, monitoring is a double-edged sword, if used properly, its accuracy, economy and efficiency make it a sword of justice that clears evil; If you wave it indiscriminately, its secrecy, aggression, and compulsion will make it an evil sword with a ferocious face. If the use of eavesdropping lacks program control, the use of eavesdropping is likely to infringe on citizens' privacy, freedom of expression, freedom of communication and, even more, public panic and disorder of social order. Therefore, how to protect the rights of the monitored person, prevent the abuse of public power, and control the monitoring behavior on a procedural basis, has become the most important task in the construction of the monitoring system. Taking the overview of the current situation of surveillance investigation as the starting point, from the emergence and development of surveillance to the current practice, through the analysis and comparative study of monitoring systems in different countries and regions, This paper puts forward the existing legislative defects of monitoring in the criminal procedure system of our country, then analyzes on the rationality of the existence of monitoring means in our country and the urgency of ensuring its procedure, and expounds the necessity of wiretapping ruling by law. Hoping to strike a balance between the punishment of crimes and the protection of human rights, between procedural justice and investigative efficiency, and to put forward legislative suggestions on the procedural protection of surveillance in our criminal procedure in order to seek simplicity and clarity, Detailed practical operational supporting procedures.
【學位授予單位】：甘肅政法學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前7條

1 李波陽;論秘密監(jiān)聽證據能力[J];重慶大學學報(社會科學版);2005年02期

2 彭勃;論監(jiān)聽作為偵查手段的法律問題[J];法商研究;2002年06期

3 黃陽明;;關于構建監(jiān)聽中司法審查程序的思考[J];法制與經濟(下旬);2013年04期

4 謝勇;;論電子數(shù)據的審查和判斷[J];法律適用;2014年01期

5 章禮明;我國通訊監(jiān)聽訴訟規(guī)則之建構[J];河北法學;2004年01期

6 王彬;;比較法視野下的監(jiān)控型秘密偵查研究[J];河北法學;2010年05期

7 李明;;論職務犯罪中技術偵查手段的運用與限制[J];華中科技大學學報(社會科學版);2009年04期

，

本文編號：2446838