【摘要】：我們知道無論是人證、物證、還是電子證據(jù)，他們功能都是證明案件的事實(shí)。作為一個案件的電子證據(jù)必須要與案件的事實(shí)有緊密的關(guān)系�，F(xiàn)在的電子證據(jù)對于我們的生活來說，已經(jīng)不是新鮮的詞匯了而是我們十分熟識的一種事物。早在很久以前就有很多的學(xué)者開始研究電子證據(jù)的問題了�，F(xiàn)在，我國計(jì)算機(jī)信息化的快速發(fā)展，已經(jīng)把電子證據(jù)的研究以及一系列的與案件有關(guān)的問題突出了。越來越多的學(xué)者專家開始關(guān)注電子證據(jù)的問題了。我們最新頒布的《民事訴訟法》和《刑事訴訟法》這兩大法律，并未對電子證據(jù)的收集等實(shí)踐問題做出進(jìn)一步的明確的規(guī)定。隨著現(xiàn)代科技的快速發(fā)展和信息技術(shù)的革新,網(wǎng)絡(luò)成了人們必不可少的一部分。與此同時,隨著我國和國際上網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)的快速發(fā)展，電子證據(jù)就成了很重要的的一種證據(jù)類型。電子證據(jù)的出現(xiàn)作為一種與計(jì)算機(jī)信息技術(shù)有關(guān)的證據(jù)類型對我國傳統(tǒng)的證據(jù)造成很大的沖擊。所以說，現(xiàn)在我們對電子證據(jù)的研究是非常必要地。隨著電子證據(jù)在世界的蓬勃發(fā)展，我國對電子證據(jù)也越來越重視了。但是，近幾年很多電子證據(jù)案件的發(fā)生，昭示著我國電子證據(jù)方面不管是在理論上還是實(shí)踐中，都存在很多問題。目前國際上以及一些其他的國家關(guān)于電子證據(jù)都做出了一些具體的規(guī)定，我國有關(guān)國家部門、地方職能政府也針對一些案件出臺了一系列相關(guān)的法律。但是這些規(guī)定只零散的分布在一些法律、法規(guī)中，沒有形成自己一套完整的立法體系。電子證據(jù)制定的不成熟會影響到電子證據(jù)基本理論的建立，因此就會造成電子證據(jù)的發(fā)展缺少法律的有效規(guī)范。因此，無論是從電子證據(jù)的立法的理論還是立法實(shí)踐的發(fā)展來看，快速確定電子證據(jù)這種新的證據(jù)類型的法律地位，我國法律各界的專家學(xué)者、政府部門、以及普通大眾共同做出努力是必要的。 電子證據(jù)基本理論研究的不足，就會造成電子證據(jù)法律規(guī)范的沖突。這樣就會直接影響電子證據(jù)法律體系的建立。這樣就影響了電子證據(jù)在我國發(fā)揮應(yīng)有的作用。本文先從電子證據(jù)的概念出發(fā)，進(jìn)一步闡述電子證據(jù)的法律地位、電子證據(jù)的特點(diǎn)等一些基本的理論問題。再分析一下國外一些典型國家對電子證據(jù)的立法研究情況、對比出我國的不足之處以及電子證據(jù)立法規(guī)定的缺失，，然后提出進(jìn)一步的改進(jìn)意見。電子證據(jù)作為一種最新出現(xiàn)的證據(jù)類型，就會與傳統(tǒng)的證據(jù)類型有一些不同。比如說在收集主體這一問題上就會出現(xiàn)專家人員、網(wǎng)絡(luò)警察等一些新的規(guī)定。最后再分析出我國電子證據(jù)方面的不足之處，進(jìn)一步提出一些關(guān)于電子證據(jù)的完善意見，然后就具體的規(guī)定做出一些詳細(xì)的意見。
[Abstract]:We know that whether it is evidence, physical evidence, or electronic evidence, their function is to prove the facts of the case. As a case of electronic evidence must have a close relationship with the facts of the case. Today's electronic evidence is no longer a new word for our lives, but something we know very well. A long time ago, many scholars began to study the problem of electronic evidence. Now, with the rapid development of computer information in China, the research of electronic evidence and a series of problems related to cases have been highlighted. More and more scholars and experts are beginning to pay attention to the problem of electronic evidence. Our two laws, the Civil procedure Law and the Criminal procedure Law, have not made further clear provisions on the collection of electronic evidence and other practical issues. With the rapid development of modern science and technology and the innovation of information technology, the network has become an indispensable part of people. At the same time, with the rapid development of network technology in China and the world, electronic evidence has become a very important type of evidence. The emergence of electronic evidence, as a kind of evidence related to computer information technology, has a great impact on the traditional evidence in China. So, now our research on electronic evidence is very necessary. With the vigorous development of electronic evidence in the world, our country has paid more and more attention to electronic evidence. However, the occurrence of many electronic evidence cases in recent years shows that there are many problems in electronic evidence in our country, both in theory and in practice. At present, the international and some other countries have made some specific provisions on electronic evidence, our country's relevant national departments, local functional governments have also issued a series of related laws in some cases. However, these provisions are scattered in some laws and regulations, and do not form their own complete legislative system. The immaturity of the establishment of electronic evidence will affect the establishment of the basic theory of electronic evidence, which will lead to the lack of effective legal norms for the development of electronic evidence. Therefore, whether from the theory of electronic evidence legislation or the development of legislative practice, quickly determine the legal status of electronic evidence as a new type of evidence, experts and scholars from all walks of law, government departments, And the common efforts of the general public are necessary. The deficiency of the basic theory of electronic evidence will lead to the conflict of legal norms of electronic evidence. This will directly affect the establishment of the legal system of electronic evidence. This affects the electronic evidence in our country play its due role. Starting from the concept of electronic evidence, this paper further expounds the legal status of electronic evidence, the characteristics of electronic evidence and other basic theoretical issues. This paper analyzes the legislative research on electronic evidence in some typical foreign countries, compares the shortcomings of our country and the deficiency of the legislative provisions of electronic evidence, and then puts forward some suggestions for further improvement. Electronic evidence, as a new type of evidence, will be different from the traditional type of evidence. For example, there will be experts, network police and other new regulations on the subject of collection. Finally, it analyzes the shortcomings of electronic evidence in our country, further puts forward some suggestions on the perfection of electronic evidence, and then makes some detailed suggestions on the specific provisions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.13

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張虹;;電子證據(jù)的證明力芻議[J];重慶郵電學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2006年03期

2 沈木珠;論電子證據(jù)問題[J];法學(xué)雜志;2001年04期

3 許康定;電子證據(jù)基本問題分析[J];法學(xué)評論;2002年03期

4 王芳;數(shù)字證據(jù)的性質(zhì)及相關(guān)規(guī)則[J];法學(xué);2004年08期

5 楊永川,李巖;電子證據(jù)取證技術(shù)的研究[J];中國人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2005年01期

6 王春;當(dāng)事人收集證據(jù)權(quán)利的程序保障研究[J];海南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會科學(xué)版);2005年02期

7 裴蒼齡;論證據(jù)的種類[J];法學(xué)研究;2003年05期

8 龍宗智;證據(jù)分類制度及其改革[J];法學(xué)研究;2005年05期

9 張謙;論電子證據(jù)在民事訴訟中的運(yùn)用[J];人民司法;2002年04期

10 聶昭偉;;證明力與證據(jù)能力規(guī)則演變規(guī)律探究——我國證據(jù)規(guī)則立法方向的理性選擇[J];西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

本文編號：2402323