【摘要】：現(xiàn)行的民事公益訴訟框架建立在私益訴訟的法院職權(quán)構(gòu)造中,圍繞私益保護(hù)的法院訴訟職權(quán)設(shè)定已無法有效實現(xiàn)公益訴訟訴訟目的,公益與私益的價值沖突以及不相匹配的審理模式嚴(yán)重影響著公益訴訟的發(fā)展。法院公益訴訟中的職權(quán)定位是解決上述問題的關(guān)鍵,更將為法院如何審理公益訴訟案件提供指引、參照。本文首先以公共利益的概念分析為基礎(chǔ),在介紹公共利益的特征與國內(nèi)法律中的公共利益概念使用中明確公共利益的內(nèi)涵,進(jìn)而延伸至公益訴訟領(lǐng)域,通過域外和國內(nèi)對公益訴訟的認(rèn)識比較為藍(lán)本重建公益訴訟的基本框架。其次,以民事公益訴訟的概念剖析為切入點,分析民事公益訴訟的理論基礎(chǔ),并通過比較探析職權(quán)主義、當(dāng)事人主義以及協(xié)同主義三種訴訟模式與民事公益訴訟的兼容性,確立我國民事公益訴訟適宜的訴訟構(gòu)造。再者,通過法院審查內(nèi)容與方式以及其深層次原因和弊端的分析還原公益訴訟啟動控制權(quán)的實然狀態(tài),并以程序正義和防止濫訴兩大原則為依據(jù),分析并試圖呈現(xiàn)法院公益訴訟啟動控制權(quán)的應(yīng)然狀態(tài)。然后,分別探討了法院被動調(diào)查取證權(quán)與主動調(diào)查取證權(quán)在不同適格原告、不同公益范圍中針對程序事項與實體事項的合理限縮。最后,以公益訴訟處分原則的彈性分析為基礎(chǔ),探究法院對當(dāng)事人和解的審查在時間范圍、公告程序、審查標(biāo)準(zhǔn)等方面的權(quán)力限度。
[Abstract]:The current framework of civil public interest litigation is established in the structure of the court functions and powers of the private interest litigation. The establishment of the court litigation authority around the protection of private interests can no longer effectively realize the purpose of the public interest litigation. The conflict of value between public interest and private interest and the unmatched trial mode seriously affect the development of public interest litigation. The position of power in the public interest litigation is the key to solve the above problems, and it will provide guidance for the court to deal with public interest litigation cases. Firstly, based on the concept analysis of public interest, this paper clarifies the connotation of public interest in introducing the characteristics of public interest and the use of the concept of public interest in domestic law, and then extends to the field of public interest litigation. Comparing the understanding of public interest litigation outside the country and at home is the basic frame of reconstructing public interest litigation. Secondly, taking the concept analysis of civil public interest litigation as the starting point, this paper analyzes the theoretical basis of civil public interest litigation, and analyzes the compatibility between the three modes of litigation and civil public interest litigation through comparative analysis of power doctrine, litigant doctrine and synergism. To establish the appropriate litigation structure of civil public interest litigation in China. Furthermore, through the analysis of the contents and methods of court review and its deep-seated causes and disadvantages, the paper analyzes the actual state of the right of control of the initiation of public interest litigation, and bases on the two principles of procedural justice and prevention of excessive litigation. This paper analyzes and attempts to present the proper state of the priming control right of the public interest litigation in the court. Then, the paper discusses the reasonable limitation of the right of passive investigation and active investigation of the court to obtain evidence in different suitable cases, different public welfare scope, for procedural and substantive matters. Finally, based on the flexible analysis of the principle of disposition of public interest litigation, this paper probes into the power limits of the court's examination of the parties' reconciliation in the time frame, the announcement procedure, the examination standard, and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 張衛(wèi)平;;民事案件受理制度的反思與重構(gòu)[J];法商研究;2015年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張艷蕊;民事公益訴訟制度研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號：2398034