【摘要】：刑事附帶民事訴訟賠償制度有利于安撫被害人、維護(hù)被害人的經(jīng)濟(jì)利益,可以減少被害人家屬的負(fù)擔(dān),有利于保證人民法院審判工作的統(tǒng)一性和嚴(yán)肅性,節(jié)省司法資源。但是,我國(guó)刑事附帶民事賠償制度最初是支持傷殘賠償金、死亡賠償金的,后來(lái)經(jīng)過(guò)最新的相關(guān)司法解釋又取消了對(duì)傷殘賠償金和死亡賠償金的支持。這在我國(guó)法制改革過(guò)程中這是一種司法倒退的現(xiàn)象,應(yīng)當(dāng)引起立法和司法界對(duì)于我國(guó)刑事附帶民事訴訟賠償制度的關(guān)注。我國(guó)現(xiàn)行的刑事附帶民事訴訟賠償制度存在賠償請(qǐng)求權(quán)主體范圍太過(guò)狹窄、賠償范圍太過(guò)狹窄、賠償義務(wù)人范圍太過(guò)狹窄及賠償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不統(tǒng)一且不合理等缺陷。應(yīng)當(dāng)擴(kuò)大賠償請(qǐng)求權(quán)主體適格范圍,并合理調(diào)整賠償義務(wù)人的判定方式。另外需要將賠償?shù)姆秶M(jìn)行合理的、貼合理論與實(shí)踐要求的調(diào)整。即應(yīng)當(dāng)根據(jù)刑事附帶民事訴訟的性質(zhì)將其予以采納的賠償范圍進(jìn)行重新規(guī)范或適當(dāng)補(bǔ)充�？偟膩�(lái)說(shuō),筆者的建議是要將刑事附帶民事的賠償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)擴(kuò)大至民事賠償?shù)姆懂?使其更加貼近生活。與此同時(shí),除了上述對(duì)該制度主體、客體的完善外,國(guó)家還應(yīng)當(dāng)在制度層面上予以配合建立健全相應(yīng)的救濟(jì)制度,為建立統(tǒng)一的賠償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)做鋪墊。
[Abstract]:The system of compensation for criminal incidental civil proceedings is beneficial to appease the victims, safeguard the economic interests of the victims, reduce the burden on the family members of the victims, ensure the unity and seriousness of the trial work of the people's courts, and save the judicial resources. However, the criminal incidental civil compensation system in our country initially supports the disability compensation and death compensation, and then cancels the support for the disability compensation and death compensation after the latest relevant judicial explanation. This phenomenon is a kind of judicial retrogression in the process of our country's legal system reform, which should arouse the attention of the legislative and judicial circles to the compensation system of the criminal incidental civil action in our country. The current system of compensation for criminal incidental civil action has some defects such as too narrow scope of subject of claim, too narrow scope of compensation obligor and ununified and unreasonable standard of compensation. We should expand the scope of the subject of claim for compensation and rationally adjust the judgment mode of the indemnification obligor. In addition, the scope of compensation should be adjusted reasonably, in accordance with the theoretical and practical requirements. That is, the scope of compensation should be re-regulated or supplemented according to the nature of criminal incidental civil action. In a word, the author's suggestion is to extend the standard of civil compensation to make it more close to life. At the same time, in addition to the above improvement of the subject and object of the system, the state should cooperate in the establishment of the corresponding relief system at the institutional level, and pave the way for the establishment of a unified standard of compensation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：煙臺(tái)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 李強(qiáng);李革明;;刑事附帶民事訴訟賠償范圍的改造——以人身權(quán)利被侵害為視角[J];人民檢察;2016年10期

2 張磊;;刑事附帶民事訴訟的賠償范圍[J];重慶郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年03期

3 孫啟福;夏川;;死亡賠償制度的嬗變及反思——以死亡賠償金及精神撫慰金為視角[J];西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

4 吳偉聰;于曉軍;王海鵬;高貴山;;統(tǒng)一損傷程度和傷殘等級(jí)鑒定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的探討[J];醫(yī)學(xué)研究雜志;2008年11期

5 姬亞平;論國(guó)家賠償法的廢止[J];南華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年03期

6 馬懷德;國(guó)家賠償責(zé)任的性質(zhì)[J];法學(xué)研究;1994年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：2367857