【摘要】：對違法所得的沒收不同于作為刑罰的沒收財產(chǎn),它不具有懲罰性,它是對原有合法狀態(tài)的恢復(fù)和補救。我國特別刑事沒收程序具有對物不對人的特點,為沒收違法所得而實行的公告程序并不是為在逃或者死亡的犯罪嫌疑人、被告人設(shè)置的。司法機關(guān)可以獨立于對犯罪事實的認定,并且依據(jù)"物權(quán)法定"原則和民事訴訟舉證原則推定有關(guān)財產(chǎn)屬于違法所得,無須適用刑事定罪和處罰的"確實、充分"證據(jù)標準。犯罪嫌疑人、被告人及其近親屬和其他利害關(guān)系人不能以對有關(guān)財產(chǎn)享有所有權(quán)為由對抗人民檢察院針對違法所得、違禁品和犯罪工具提出的沒收申請。
[Abstract]:The confiscation of illegal gains is different from the confiscation of property as punishment, it is not punitive, it is the restoration and remedy of the original legal state. The special criminal confiscation procedure of our country has the characteristic that the property is not against the person. The announcement procedure for confiscating the illegal income is not set up for the criminal suspect or the defendant who is at large or dead. The judicial organ can be independent of the determination of the fact of crime, and according to the principle of "real right law" and the principle of proof in civil proceedings, the relevant property is presumed to be illegal income, without the need to apply the "true, sufficient" evidentiary standard of criminal conviction and punishment. Criminal suspects, defendants and their close relatives and other interested parties may not use the right of ownership of the relevant property to counter people's procuratorates' applications for confiscation of illegal gains, contraband and criminal instrumentalities.
【作者單位】： 北京師范大學(xué)刑事法律科學(xué)研究院;
【分類號】：D925.2
，

本文編號：2292170