行政程序證明標準研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-19 15:47
【摘要】：行政證據(jù)制度是行政程序的重要組成部分，證明標準是是證據(jù)的內(nèi)重要容，但是與行政訴訟的證明標準理論所不同，行政程序證明標準發(fā)展緩慢，完全沒有跟上行政程序發(fā)展的步伐。本文以行政程序證明標準為題目，對行政程序證明標準理論缺失的表征進行充分解析，分析了立法與實踐，提出行政程序證明標準體系的確立應(yīng)當是考慮多方面的因素。 本文主要分為三個部分，第一部分是行政程序證明標準概念的提出，對證明標準追本溯源，分析了證明標準的內(nèi)涵既不是絕對的客觀真實真實，也不是絕對的法律真實，而是包括主客觀相統(tǒng)一的客觀真實，界定了行政程序證明標準并且分析了行政程序證明標準提出的必要性，分析了行政程序證明標準與證明責(zé)任的關(guān)系；而后分析了行政訴訟證明標準與行政程序證明責(zé)任的關(guān)系以及行政程序證明標準與證明對象之間的關(guān)系，厘清這兩組組關(guān)系，對確定適用怎樣的證明標準具有重要的意義。第二部分介紹了兩大法系代表國家的行政程序證明標準，分析了域外行政程序證明標準的正當性，以期為我國行政程序證明標準的確立提供一些借鑒。結(jié)合行政程序的相關(guān)法律分析了我國目前法律中所規(guī)定了行政程序的證明標準是“事實清楚、證據(jù)確鑿”，指出了目前法律中規(guī)定的行政程序證明標準的不科學(xué)，，分析了在實踐中，行政程序證明標準適用出現(xiàn)的問題包括“行政程序證明標準與行政訴訟證明標準部分”、“證明標準的單一”以及“證明標準的確定主體”都是存在問題的。第三部分是行政程序證明標準的構(gòu)建，論述了影響行政程序證明標準確定的因素。認為行政程序證明標準的建立應(yīng)當要區(qū)分行政程序證明標準與行政訴訟證明標準，考慮證明標準與證明責(zé)任、證明對象的關(guān)系，考慮做出行政程序是所處的環(huán)境。創(chuàng)造性的提出了行政程序證明標準的適用首先得區(qū)分行政程序是否排除在行政訴訟審查之外的，排除在行政訴訟審查之外證明標準包括不可訴行政行為的證明標準和行政合理性事實的審查標準。受行政訴訟審查的行政程序證明標準應(yīng)當是分層次遞進的一個標準體系，這一證明標準體系，既可以適用在行政程序中，也可以適用在行政訴訟中。
[Abstract]:The system of administrative evidence is an important part of administrative procedure, and the standard of proof is an important part of evidence. But different from the theory of standard of proof in administrative litigation, the standard of proof of administrative procedure develops slowly. It completely failed to keep pace with the development of administrative procedures. Taking the standard of proof of administrative procedure as the topic, this paper fully analyzes the lack of the theory of the standard of proof of administrative procedure, analyzes the legislation and practice, and points out that the establishment of the standard system of proof of administrative procedure should be the consideration of many factors. This paper is mainly divided into three parts. The first part is the concept of the standard of proof of administrative procedure. To trace back to the source of the standard of proof, the connotation of the standard of proof is neither absolute objective truth nor absolute legal truth. It includes the objective reality of the unity of subjectivity and objectivity, defines the standard of proof of administrative procedure and analyzes the necessity of putting forward the standard of proof of administrative procedure, and analyzes the relationship between the standard of proof of administrative procedure and the burden of proof. Then it analyzes the relationship between the proof standard of administrative litigation and the burden of proof of administrative procedure and the relationship between the standard of proof of administrative procedure and the object of proof, and clarifies the relationship between the two groups, which is of great significance for determining the applicable standard of proof. The second part introduces the standards of proof of administrative procedure in the two legal systems, and analyzes the legitimacy of the standard of proof of administrative procedure outside the country, in order to provide some reference for the establishment of the standard of proof of administrative procedure in our country. Combined with the relevant laws of administrative procedure, this paper analyzes that the standard of proof of administrative procedure stipulated in the present law of our country is "the facts are clear and the evidence is conclusive", and points out that the standard of proof of administrative procedure stipulated in the present law is unscientific. This paper analyzes the problems in the application of the standard of proof of administrative procedure in practice, such as "the standard of proof of administrative procedure and the standard of proof in administrative proceedings", "the single standard of proof" and "the subject of determining the standard of proof". The third part is the construction of administrative procedure certification standard, and discusses the factors that affect the determination of administrative procedure certification standard. It is considered that the establishment of the standard of proof of administrative procedure should distinguish the standard of proof of administrative procedure from the standard of proof of administrative procedure, consider the standard of proof and the burden of proof, the relation of object of proof, and consider the environment in which administrative procedure is made. Creatively put forward the application of the standard of proof of administrative procedure must distinguish whether the administrative procedure is excluded from the examination of administrative litigation, The standard of proof excluded from the review of administrative litigation includes the standard of proof of non-actionable administrative act and the standard of examination of administrative reasonableness fact. The standard of proof of administrative procedure subject to the examination of administrative litigation should be a standard system of hierarchical progression, which can be applied not only in administrative procedure but also in administrative litigation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.3
本文編號：2281587
[Abstract]:The system of administrative evidence is an important part of administrative procedure, and the standard of proof is an important part of evidence. But different from the theory of standard of proof in administrative litigation, the standard of proof of administrative procedure develops slowly. It completely failed to keep pace with the development of administrative procedures. Taking the standard of proof of administrative procedure as the topic, this paper fully analyzes the lack of the theory of the standard of proof of administrative procedure, analyzes the legislation and practice, and points out that the establishment of the standard system of proof of administrative procedure should be the consideration of many factors. This paper is mainly divided into three parts. The first part is the concept of the standard of proof of administrative procedure. To trace back to the source of the standard of proof, the connotation of the standard of proof is neither absolute objective truth nor absolute legal truth. It includes the objective reality of the unity of subjectivity and objectivity, defines the standard of proof of administrative procedure and analyzes the necessity of putting forward the standard of proof of administrative procedure, and analyzes the relationship between the standard of proof of administrative procedure and the burden of proof. Then it analyzes the relationship between the proof standard of administrative litigation and the burden of proof of administrative procedure and the relationship between the standard of proof of administrative procedure and the object of proof, and clarifies the relationship between the two groups, which is of great significance for determining the applicable standard of proof. The second part introduces the standards of proof of administrative procedure in the two legal systems, and analyzes the legitimacy of the standard of proof of administrative procedure outside the country, in order to provide some reference for the establishment of the standard of proof of administrative procedure in our country. Combined with the relevant laws of administrative procedure, this paper analyzes that the standard of proof of administrative procedure stipulated in the present law of our country is "the facts are clear and the evidence is conclusive", and points out that the standard of proof of administrative procedure stipulated in the present law is unscientific. This paper analyzes the problems in the application of the standard of proof of administrative procedure in practice, such as "the standard of proof of administrative procedure and the standard of proof in administrative proceedings", "the single standard of proof" and "the subject of determining the standard of proof". The third part is the construction of administrative procedure certification standard, and discusses the factors that affect the determination of administrative procedure certification standard. It is considered that the establishment of the standard of proof of administrative procedure should distinguish the standard of proof of administrative procedure from the standard of proof of administrative procedure, consider the standard of proof and the burden of proof, the relation of object of proof, and consider the environment in which administrative procedure is made. Creatively put forward the application of the standard of proof of administrative procedure must distinguish whether the administrative procedure is excluded from the examination of administrative litigation, The standard of proof excluded from the review of administrative litigation includes the standard of proof of non-actionable administrative act and the standard of examination of administrative reasonableness fact. The standard of proof of administrative procedure subject to the examination of administrative litigation should be a standard system of hierarchical progression, which can be applied not only in administrative procedure but also in administrative litigation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.3
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 胡秀玲;張靜;;淺析我國行政程序中的證明標準[J];成都行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2011年06期
2 沈�？�;論行政證據(jù)中的若干法律問題[J];法商研究;2004年01期
3 章劍生;行政程序中證據(jù)制度的若干問題探討[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報);1997年06期
4 熊洋;;對行政訴訟證明標準的思考——兼論行政訴訟證明標準與行政程序證明標準之應(yīng)然關(guān)系[J];河南理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2006年01期
5 徐繼敏;;美國行政程序證據(jù)規(guī)則分析[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2008年01期
6 劉善春;行政程序和行政訴訟證明標準研究[J];行政法學(xué)研究;1993年02期
7 王曉杰;行政訴訟證明標準的重構(gòu)[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2004年02期
8 黃學(xué)賢;丁鈺;;我國行政程序法證據(jù)規(guī)則若干問題探析[J];徐州師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2009年05期
9 湯維建,陳開欣;試論英美證據(jù)法上的刑事證明標準[J];政法論壇;1993年04期
10 江偉,吳澤勇;證據(jù)法若干基本問題的法哲學(xué)分析[J];中國法學(xué);2002年01期
本文編號：2281587
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2281587.html
