分割共有物訴訟之研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-19 18:08
【摘要】：分割共有物訴訟是一種特殊類型的訴訟,因此在適用民事訴訟基本理論時與普通民事訴訟類型有所差別,而目前我國理論上鮮有對該訴訟類型的研究,且在實務中對該訴訟類型的關注也主要集中在實體方面。本文則從訴訟法的角度對分割共有物訴訟進行研究,以舊實體法學說為指導,以訴訟客體(即訴訟標的)為切入點,對該訴訟類型的特殊性進行考察。本文通過四個部分對分割共有物訴訟進行考察:第一部分,研析分割共有物訴訟的基本法理。首先從共有法律關系入手,闡明共有法律關系的內(nèi)容,而后通過考察德、日法上的分割共有物法律關系,并基于我國現(xiàn)有法律規(guī)定對分割共有物法律關系進行分析;其次,對實體法上的分割共有物請求權(quán)的性質(zhì)進行考察分析,得出其為一種特殊類型(要件欠缺)的形成權(quán),并藉此過渡到對分割共有物訴訟性質(zhì)及其訴訟標的考察。也呈現(xiàn)出本文的指導理論,即舊實體法學說的訴訟標的理論,并將其運用于研析該訴訟的審理及判決效力的特殊性中。第二部分,該部分以訴訟客體為視角對分割共有物訴訟審理的具體問題進行論述并提出建議。主要對訴訟請求、訴的客觀合并兩個方面的問題進行闡述;在貫徹處分主義的民事訴訟中,訴訟請求等同于訴訟標的,而在我國處分原則內(nèi)容受限、缺失的情況下,混淆訴訟請求和訴訟標的的關系也就不足為奇,加之分割共有物訴訟中審理對象包括是否分割和定分割方法,后者易生突襲裁判,對當事人權(quán)利保障不利;而在訴的客觀合并中,因為對其基礎理論和立法不完善,進一步造成在分割共有物審理中突襲裁判、訴外裁判等問題;結(jié)合司法實務案例提出建議。此外,因訴訟審理對象具有特殊性,還生訴訟法理和非訟法理交錯適用、辯論主義和職權(quán)主義交錯適用的問題。第三部分,言明分割共有物訴訟判決效力之法理并評析�？疾煸撛V訟判決既判力及執(zhí)行力的法理,闡述我國法律效力制度的問題。以訴訟請求、爭議對象、審判對象與既判力、執(zhí)行力的客觀范圍的一致性為前提,詳述分割共有物訴訟判決既判力的特殊性;關于執(zhí)行力問題,主要對其是否有執(zhí)行力以及執(zhí)行中的具體問題進行分析,并提出建議。第四部分,結(jié)語。分割共有物請求權(quán)的性質(zhì),即要件欠缺的形成權(quán);分割共有物訴訟的性質(zhì),即形式的形成之訴;訴訟標的則包括分割共有物請求權(quán)和定分割方法。在全文保持理論一致性的同時,談及實務問題;此外還對本文寫作中的不足作簡要闡釋。
[Abstract]:As a special type of litigation, the division of joint property litigation is different from that of ordinary civil action when it is applied to the basic theory of civil action. However, there is little research on the type of action in our country at present. And in practice, the focus on the type of litigation is also focused on the substantive aspects. From the point of view of procedural law, this paper studies the division of common property litigation, taking the old substantive law theory as the guidance and the object of litigation (that is, the object of the lawsuit) as the starting point to investigate the particularity of the litigation type. In this paper, the division of common property litigation through four parts to investigate: the first part, analyze the division of common property litigation of the basic legal principles. First of all, it clarifies the content of mutual legal relationship from the perspective of mutual legal relationship, and then analyzes the legal relationship of partitioned common property based on the existing legal provisions of our country by examining the legal relationship of divided common property in Germany and Japan. Based on the investigation and analysis of the nature of the claim for division of common things in substantive law, it is obtained that it is a kind of formation right of special type (lacking of important elements), and by this means it is transferred to the investigation of the nature of litigation and the object of action of the division of common property. It also presents the guiding theory of this article, that is, the theory of the object of action of the old substantive law theory, and applies it to analyze the particularity of the trial of the lawsuit and the validity of the judgment. In the second part, from the angle of object of litigation, the author discusses and puts forward some suggestions. It mainly expounds the two aspects of litigation request and objective merger of action. In the civil action of implementing disposition doctrine, the litigation request is equal to the object of the action, but in the case of the limitation of the content of the principle of disposition in our country, and the absence of the principle of disposition, It is not surprising to confuse the relationship between the litigation request and the object of the action. In addition, the trial object in the division of common property litigation includes whether to divide the object and the fixed division method. The latter is prone to raid the judge, which is disadvantageous to the protection of the parties' rights. In the objective combination of litigation, because of its basic theory and legislation is not perfect, resulting in further in the division of common property in the trial of surprise adjudication, external adjudication and other issues; combined with the judicial practice of the case to put forward suggestions. In addition, due to the particularity of the object of trial, there are also the problems of interlaced application of procedural and non-litigative legal principles, and cross-application of argumentalism and functionalism. The third part describes the legal theory and comments on the validity of the judgment in the division of common property litigation. The legal principle of the res judicata and execution of the litigation judgment is investigated, and the legal effect system of our country is expounded. On the premise of the consistency of litigation request, object of dispute, object of trial and objective scope of res judicata and execution, the particularity of judgment res judicata of division of common things is described. It mainly analyzes whether it has executive power and the specific problems in implementation, and puts forward some suggestions. The fourth part, conclusion. The nature of the claim of partitioning common things, that is, the right of formation lacking in the elements; the nature of the action of division of common things, that is, the formative action of the form; the object of the litigation includes the claim of the division of the common property and the method of definite division. While maintaining the theoretical consistency, the thesis also discusses the practical problems and briefly explains the shortcomings of this thesis.
【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D925.1
本文編號：2281937
[Abstract]:As a special type of litigation, the division of joint property litigation is different from that of ordinary civil action when it is applied to the basic theory of civil action. However, there is little research on the type of action in our country at present. And in practice, the focus on the type of litigation is also focused on the substantive aspects. From the point of view of procedural law, this paper studies the division of common property litigation, taking the old substantive law theory as the guidance and the object of litigation (that is, the object of the lawsuit) as the starting point to investigate the particularity of the litigation type. In this paper, the division of common property litigation through four parts to investigate: the first part, analyze the division of common property litigation of the basic legal principles. First of all, it clarifies the content of mutual legal relationship from the perspective of mutual legal relationship, and then analyzes the legal relationship of partitioned common property based on the existing legal provisions of our country by examining the legal relationship of divided common property in Germany and Japan. Based on the investigation and analysis of the nature of the claim for division of common things in substantive law, it is obtained that it is a kind of formation right of special type (lacking of important elements), and by this means it is transferred to the investigation of the nature of litigation and the object of action of the division of common property. It also presents the guiding theory of this article, that is, the theory of the object of action of the old substantive law theory, and applies it to analyze the particularity of the trial of the lawsuit and the validity of the judgment. In the second part, from the angle of object of litigation, the author discusses and puts forward some suggestions. It mainly expounds the two aspects of litigation request and objective merger of action. In the civil action of implementing disposition doctrine, the litigation request is equal to the object of the action, but in the case of the limitation of the content of the principle of disposition in our country, and the absence of the principle of disposition, It is not surprising to confuse the relationship between the litigation request and the object of the action. In addition, the trial object in the division of common property litigation includes whether to divide the object and the fixed division method. The latter is prone to raid the judge, which is disadvantageous to the protection of the parties' rights. In the objective combination of litigation, because of its basic theory and legislation is not perfect, resulting in further in the division of common property in the trial of surprise adjudication, external adjudication and other issues; combined with the judicial practice of the case to put forward suggestions. In addition, due to the particularity of the object of trial, there are also the problems of interlaced application of procedural and non-litigative legal principles, and cross-application of argumentalism and functionalism. The third part describes the legal theory and comments on the validity of the judgment in the division of common property litigation. The legal principle of the res judicata and execution of the litigation judgment is investigated, and the legal effect system of our country is expounded. On the premise of the consistency of litigation request, object of dispute, object of trial and objective scope of res judicata and execution, the particularity of judgment res judicata of division of common things is described. It mainly analyzes whether it has executive power and the specific problems in implementation, and puts forward some suggestions. The fourth part, conclusion. The nature of the claim of partitioning common things, that is, the right of formation lacking in the elements; the nature of the action of division of common things, that is, the formative action of the form; the object of the litigation includes the claim of the division of the common property and the method of definite division. While maintaining the theoretical consistency, the thesis also discusses the practical problems and briefly explains the shortcomings of this thesis.
【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D925.1
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 刁其懷;;關于共有物的分割[J];中國房地產(chǎn);2008年07期
2 孫婭娣;俞淵;;共有物分割中的動態(tài)系統(tǒng)論[J];湖北警官學院學報;2012年04期
3 翟寅生;陳羅蘭;;共有物分管協(xié)議對抗效力芻議[J];法治論壇;2009年02期
4 陳建勛,洪麗敏;論共有物私自出賣的性質(zhì)與效力[J];浙江工商大學學報;2004年04期
5 翟寅生;陳羅蘭;;共有物分管協(xié)議對抗效力芻議[J];研究生法學;2009年02期
6 李天亮;;共有物返還訴訟若干問題研究[J];西南政法大學學報;2013年03期
7 趙秀梅;;共有物處分問題研究[J];法學論壇;2013年06期
8 張力毅;;共有物分管契約對外效力之辯——臺灣地區(qū)財產(chǎn)法上最富爭議之論題[J];臺灣研究集刊;2013年03期
9 冉璐;;淺議共有物的處分[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(下旬刊);2009年06期
10 劉耀東;;按份共有中共有物分割問題研究[J];云南大學學報(法學版);2010年04期
相關會議論文 前1條
1 斯拉沃熱·齊澤克;汪行福;;如何從頭開始?[A];當代國外馬克思主義評論（8）[C];2010年
相關碩士學位論文 前9條
1 石晶晶;共有物訴訟及其類型化研究[D];蘇州大學;2015年
2 徐夏;分割共有物訴訟之研究[D];華東政法大學;2016年
3 朱亞慧;知識共有物理論研究[D];華中師范大學;2009年
4 康鄧承;論共有物分割之訴[D];西南政法大學;2010年
5 袁婷婷;共有物分割訴訟研究[D];西南政法大學;2014年
6 譚閩;論共有物分割之訴的判決效力[D];西南政法大學;2015年
7 耿燕紅;共有物分割請求權(quán)研究[D];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學;2011年
8 李天亮;論共有物返還訴訟[D];西南政法大學;2014年
9 李旭;共有物返還訴訟研究[D];西南政法大學;2012年
，本文編號：2281937
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2281937.html
