刑事和解適用的案件范圍研究
發(fā)布時間:2018-10-19 14:27
【摘要】:刑事和解制度作為一種新型的刑事糾紛解決方法,已經(jīng)在西方國家取得了良好的社會效果。我國的刑事和解制度規(guī)定于2012年新頒布的《刑事訴訟法》中,它被學(xué)界公認為是刑事糾紛解決方式中的一項重要創(chuàng)新,很大程度上解決了刑事和解制度無法可依的局面,但在實踐中,刑事和解制度還是存在一些問題,比如適用的案件范圍不夠合理。本文從刑事和解制度的概念和理論依據(jù)入手,通過分析刑事和解制度產(chǎn)生的原因和必要性,目的在于從根源上找出完善刑事和解制度的方法,真正做到刑事和解制度適用的案件范圍科學(xué)、合理。 本文除引言和結(jié)語外,共分四個部分,第一部分是關(guān)于刑事和解制度的概況,主要論述了該制度的概念,提出我國引入刑事和解制度的意義。 第二部分是對刑事和解制度適用的案件范圍規(guī)定的原因分析,主要是從我國刑事和解制度發(fā)展的歷史、現(xiàn)狀入手,找出刑事和解制度的思想基礎(chǔ),并分析其這樣規(guī)定的原因。 第三部分是對我國刑事和解制度適用的案件范圍的規(guī)范分析,通過現(xiàn)行刑訴法的規(guī)定,來分析兩種作者認為有可能采用刑事和解方式處理的案件為今后這兩類案件采用刑事和解制度處理掃清理論的障礙。 第四部分是對我國刑事和解制度適用的案件范圍的完善建議,通過對域外刑事和解制度的分析,總結(jié)其經(jīng)驗,最終提出我國應(yīng)當采用主客觀相統(tǒng)一的方式來劃定刑事和解適用的案件范圍的建議。
[Abstract]:As a new method of resolving criminal disputes, the system of criminal reconciliation has achieved good social effect in western countries. The criminal reconciliation system of our country is stipulated in the newly promulgated Criminal procedure Law in 2012. It is recognized by the academic circles as an important innovation in the settlement of criminal disputes, which to a great extent solves the situation in which the criminal reconciliation system cannot be relied upon. However, in practice, there are still some problems in the system of criminal reconciliation, such as the scope of applicable cases is not reasonable. Starting with the concept and theoretical basis of the criminal reconciliation system, this paper analyzes the causes and necessity of the criminal reconciliation system, aiming at finding out the methods of perfecting the criminal reconciliation system from the root. It is true that the scope of cases applicable to the criminal reconciliation system is scientific and reasonable. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into four parts. The first part is about the general situation of the criminal reconciliation system, mainly discusses the concept of the system, and puts forward the significance of introducing the criminal reconciliation system in our country. The second part is the reason analysis of the case scope of criminal reconciliation system, mainly from the history and current situation of the criminal reconciliation system development in China, to find out the ideological basis of the criminal reconciliation system, and analyze the reasons for such provisions. The third part is the normative analysis of the scope of cases applicable to the system of criminal reconciliation in China, and the adoption of the provisions of the current Criminal procedure Law. This paper analyzes the two kinds of cases which the author thinks it is possible to deal with by the way of criminal reconciliation. It clears the theoretical obstacles for the two cases to adopt the system of criminal reconciliation in the future. The fourth part is to improve the scope of the criminal reconciliation system in China, through the analysis of the extraterritorial criminal reconciliation system, summed up its experience. Finally, the author puts forward the suggestion that our country should adopt the unified way of subjective and objective to delimit the scope of cases of criminal reconciliation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號】:D925.2
本文編號:2281409
[Abstract]:As a new method of resolving criminal disputes, the system of criminal reconciliation has achieved good social effect in western countries. The criminal reconciliation system of our country is stipulated in the newly promulgated Criminal procedure Law in 2012. It is recognized by the academic circles as an important innovation in the settlement of criminal disputes, which to a great extent solves the situation in which the criminal reconciliation system cannot be relied upon. However, in practice, there are still some problems in the system of criminal reconciliation, such as the scope of applicable cases is not reasonable. Starting with the concept and theoretical basis of the criminal reconciliation system, this paper analyzes the causes and necessity of the criminal reconciliation system, aiming at finding out the methods of perfecting the criminal reconciliation system from the root. It is true that the scope of cases applicable to the criminal reconciliation system is scientific and reasonable. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into four parts. The first part is about the general situation of the criminal reconciliation system, mainly discusses the concept of the system, and puts forward the significance of introducing the criminal reconciliation system in our country. The second part is the reason analysis of the case scope of criminal reconciliation system, mainly from the history and current situation of the criminal reconciliation system development in China, to find out the ideological basis of the criminal reconciliation system, and analyze the reasons for such provisions. The third part is the normative analysis of the scope of cases applicable to the system of criminal reconciliation in China, and the adoption of the provisions of the current Criminal procedure Law. This paper analyzes the two kinds of cases which the author thinks it is possible to deal with by the way of criminal reconciliation. It clears the theoretical obstacles for the two cases to adopt the system of criminal reconciliation in the future. The fourth part is to improve the scope of the criminal reconciliation system in China, through the analysis of the extraterritorial criminal reconciliation system, summed up its experience. Finally, the author puts forward the suggestion that our country should adopt the unified way of subjective and objective to delimit the scope of cases of criminal reconciliation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號】:D925.2
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 王志祥;何恒攀;;論刑事和解的案件范圍[J];北京航空航天大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年04期
2 黃京平;左袖陽;;刑事和解借鑒之分析[J];當代法學(xué);2008年01期
3 石磊;;論我國刑事和解制度的刑事實體法根據(jù)[J];法商研究;2006年05期
4 羅結(jié)珍;;法國刑事訴訟法中的刑事調(diào)解與刑事和解[J];法學(xué)雜志;2008年03期
5 姜敏;劉文飛;;刑事和解適用案件范圍探究[J];甘肅社會科學(xué);2010年06期
6 王章力;;論刑事和解與罪刑法定原則的沖突與調(diào)適[J];西部法學(xué)評論;2011年02期
7 胡方洋;;淺議刑事和解制度及其在我國的構(gòu)建[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年01期
8 劉晶晶;;當前我國經(jīng)濟犯罪案件適用刑事和解問題研究[J];中國人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2013年01期
9 鄭麗萍;;新刑訴法視域下的刑事和解制度研究[J];比較法研究;2013年02期
10 賀岱;孫松松;;刑事和解的理論和實踐再討論——以最新修訂的《刑事訴訟法》為視角[J];法制與社會;2013年08期
,本文編號:2281409
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2281409.html