【摘要】：執(zhí)行和解在強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行中發(fā)揮了比較重要的作用，促進(jìn)了當(dāng)事人自愿履行。該制度體現(xiàn)出極強(qiáng)的便宜性、經(jīng)濟(jì)性的特點，緩解了當(dāng)事雙方的矛盾，維護(hù)了社會的穩(wěn)定。但是，其在理論和實踐方面也存在一些問題。首先，理論界和司法界對于和解的性質(zhì)尚無統(tǒng)一認(rèn)識。其次，執(zhí)行法院監(jiān)督和解履行情況不利，，某些債務(wù)人利用和解逃避執(zhí)行或隱藏財產(chǎn)，影響了債權(quán)人的利益。最后，民事訴訟法規(guī)定的救濟(jì)措施單一，缺少對債權(quán)人的起訴權(quán)與債務(wù)人異議之訴的規(guī)定。 對于這些問題，本文從以下方面展開論述：首先，對執(zhí)行和解的基本理論進(jìn)行梳理。和解行為的性質(zhì)主要有私法行為說、訴訟行為說、兩行為說、一行為兩性質(zhì)說。在對各種學(xué)說分析的基礎(chǔ)之上，筆者贊成一行為兩性質(zhì)說的觀點。和解協(xié)議與生效法律文書的關(guān)系主要有替代關(guān)系、并行關(guān)系、目的與手段關(guān)系。在對各種關(guān)系分析的基礎(chǔ)之上，筆者贊成目的與手段的關(guān)系。其次，通過介紹英美法系、大陸法系、臺灣地區(qū)的執(zhí)行和解規(guī)定，與我國相關(guān)法律的比較，提出我國立法中需要完善的內(nèi)容。再次，闡述了六類和解問題及相關(guān)分析。最后，提出兩項立法性建議，其一是賦予執(zhí)行和解法律效力，其二是和解協(xié)議可訴性。賦予執(zhí)行和解效力中提出向法院申請確認(rèn)效力這一訴訟制度。賦予和解協(xié)議可訴性中提出設(shè)立債務(wù)人異議之訴制度。
[Abstract]:The implementation of reconciliation played a more important role in the enforcement of enforcement and facilitated the voluntary performance of the parties. The system reflects extremely strong and economical characteristics, relieves the contradiction between the parties, and maintains the stability of the society. However, there are some problems in theory and practice. First, there is no unified understanding of the nature of the reconciliation between the academic circle and the judicial circle. Secondly, the enforcement of the court's supervision of reconciliation is detrimental to the fact that some debtors use reconciliation to escape execution or concealment of property, affecting the interests of creditors. Finally, the remedy measures stipulated by the Civil Procedure Law are single and lack the provisions on the rights of creditors and the protest against the debtor. For these problems, this paper discusses the following aspects: Firstly, the basic theory of the implementation of reconciliation is carried out The nature of the behavior of reconciliation is that of private law, the action of the action said, the two actions say, a behavior gender On the basis of analysis of various theories, I agree with the two properties of a behavior. Point of view: The relationship between the settlement agreement and the effective legal document mainly has alternative relations, parallel relationship, purpose and means. Relationship. On the basis of analysis of various relationships, I agree with the purpose and means. Secondly, through the introduction of the law system, the continental law system, the enforcement and reconciliation regulations of Taiwan, and the comparison of relevant laws in our country, it is necessary to perfect the legislation in our country. Content. Once again, the six reconciliation problems and related issues are expounded. Finally, two legislative proposals are put forward, one of which is to give effect to the enforcement of reconciliation, and the other is that the settlement agreement may A suit in which a court applies for confirmation of the validity of a settlement. The action of establishing the debtor's objection in the appeal of the settlement agreement.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.18

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 肖建國,趙晉山;民事執(zhí)行若干疑難問題探討[J];法律適用;2005年06期

2 徐繼軍;;論執(zhí)行和解協(xié)議的效力與性質(zhì)[J];法律適用;2006年09期

3 何國強(qiáng);;論民事訴訟二審中和解協(xié)議的性質(zhì)——最高人民法院2號指導(dǎo)性案例評析[J];北方法學(xué);2012年04期

4 徐小飛;;執(zhí)行和解中法院的職能和角色[J];法律適用;2012年10期

5 應(yīng)俊;;執(zhí)行和解協(xié)議的效力分析[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬);2012年10期

6 汪鵬;;淺析執(zhí)行和解中的擔(dān)保效力[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬刊);2011年10期

7 范小華;;執(zhí)行和解協(xié)議的效力分析及完善立法建議[J];河北法學(xué);2008年06期

8 鮑萌;;淺析涉及擔(dān)保的執(zhí)行和解——以程序選擇權(quán)為視角[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年04期

9 黃金龍;;不履行執(zhí)行中的和解協(xié)議的救濟(jì)程序[J];人民司法;2005年11期

10 李欣紅;葉伶俐;;論申請執(zhí)行人反悔執(zhí)行和解協(xié)議的法律處分——由一起執(zhí)行裁決案件引發(fā)的思考[J];山東審判;2011年01期

本文編號：2281085