【摘要】：2012年修改后的《民事訴訟法》增設確立了我國法上的第三人撤銷之訴程序，并在立法體例將其納入了當事人制度之中，但從適用主體、立法體例上的設置觀察，新設程序被認為是立法者概念混淆的產物，加之原先的第三人參加訴訟制度立法的相對滯后造成司法實踐混亂無序的現(xiàn)狀，已經備受詬病，因此實有必要借此重新審視我國民事訴訟第三人制度。隨著中國經濟水平的不斷發(fā)展、社會經濟生活日趨復雜，利益訴求多元化已成常態(tài)，有第三人參與的案件已較為常見，而應予追加而未予追加，不應追加而盲目追加的情形時有發(fā)生，違反了法定程序，，損害了當事人的合法權益，息訟服判的美好愿景無從談起，司法權威經受質疑。不言而喻，我國現(xiàn)行實施的民事訴訟法中有關第三人的規(guī)定，遠遠不能滿足現(xiàn)實需要，對第三人制度進行研究梳理，具有充分的現(xiàn)實意義。 本文正文由四個部分組成，第一部分為民事訴訟第三人制度基本概述，含義和特征，作用、功能和價值等幾個方面進行簡單的概括闡述，明確幾個重要的基本概念；第二部分，則是簡要匯總美、德、日訴訟第三人制度，找出其相互之間的制度差異并試圖探究成因，引出輔助參加制度的概念和特征，為后文做打基礎、做鋪墊；第三部分則回到我國民事訴訟的第三人制度現(xiàn)狀，以民事訴訟法條文出發(fā)，分別對有獨立請求權第三人、無獨立請求權第三人的現(xiàn)狀和理論進行梳理，并分別介紹兩者的常見類型及運行缺陷，并介紹我國民事訴訟第三人制度兩種主要完善方案，部分分解模式以及整體重構模式，分歧兩者之間的區(qū)別與聯(lián)系；第四部分也就是正文的最后部分，將在前文的研究基礎上，提出對我國民事訴訟第三人制度的完善提出若干建議，如針對我國法上的第三人撤銷之訴立法缺陷的完善和建議，設立告知程序、賦予當事人程序選擇權等等。
[Abstract]:The addition of the revised Civil procedure Law in 2012 establishes the procedure of the third party's revocation in the law of our country, and brings it into the party system in the legislative style. However, it is observed from the set up of the applicable subject and the legislative style. The new procedure is considered to be the product of confusion of the concept of the legislator, and the relative lag of the third party's participation in the legislation of the litigation system has caused confusion and disorder in judicial practice, which has been criticized. Therefore, it is necessary to re-examine the third party system of civil action in China. With the continuous development of China's economic level, social and economic life is becoming increasingly complex, diversification of interest demands has become the norm, cases involving third parties have become more common and should be added instead of added. The situation that should not be appended and blindly appended happens from time to time, violates the legal procedure, damages the legal rights and interests of the parties, the fine vision of interest litigation and judgment is impossible to talk about, and the judicial authority is questioned. It goes without saying that the provisions concerning the third party in the current civil procedure law in our country are far from satisfying the practical needs. It is of full practical significance to study the third party system. This text is composed of four parts, the first part is the basic overview of the third party system of civil action, meaning and characteristics, role, function and value, and other aspects of a simple summary, clear several important basic concepts; the second part, It is a brief summary of the United States, Germany, Japan litigation of the third party system, find out the differences between the system and try to explore the cause of formation, leading to the concept and characteristics of the auxiliary participation system, to lay the foundation for the following text, do the groundwork; The third part goes back to the status quo of the third party system in civil litigation in our country, starting from the provisions of the civil procedure law, combing the present situation and theory of the third party with independent claim right and the third party without independent claim right, respectively. It also introduces the common types and operational defects of the two, and introduces the two main perfect schemes of the third party system of civil action in our country, the partial decomposition mode and the overall reconstruction mode, and the difference and relation between the two; The fourth part is the last part of the text, on the basis of the previous research, the author puts forward some suggestions on the perfection of the third party system of civil action in our country, such as the perfection and suggestion of the legislative defect of the third party revocation in our country's law. Setting up notification procedure, giving the parties the option of procedure and so on.
【學位授予單位】：上海交通大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前9條

1 沈毅;;被告型無獨立請求權第三人制度研究[J];法制與社會;2010年10期

2 楊成良;;離婚訴訟中的第三人制度研究[J];湖南社會科學;2012年05期

3 許可;;論第三人撤銷訴訟制度[J];當代法學;2013年01期

4 胡震遠;;輔助型無獨立請求權第三人制度的完善[J];東方法學;2013年03期

5 崔玲玲;;民事訴訟中第三人利益保護系統(tǒng)論——以訴為中心[J];河北法學;2012年04期

6 閆賓;;民事訴訟第三人制度比較分析[J];湖南科技學院學報;2011年07期

7 張衛(wèi)平;;“第三人”:類型劃分及展開[J];民事程序法研究;2004年00期

8 宋漢林;;第三人撤銷訴訟立法的完善[J];理論探索;2013年02期

9 黃仕紅;論民事訴訟中無獨立請求權第三人的訴訟地位[J];四川行政學院學報;2001年04期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 張妮;第三人撤銷之訴研究[D];西南政法大學;2012年

本文編號：2237296