【摘要】：我國侵害公共利益的案件頻發(fā),人們也有意識的尋求司法救濟。但是司法救濟的重要程序問題——審判程序卻沒有引起學(xué)界和司法實務(wù)界的重視,目前為止公益訴訟案件依然適用傳統(tǒng)民事訴訟審判程序進行審理。這種做法不僅給審判人員和當(dāng)事人的訴訟活動帶來不便,而且降低了裁判結(jié)果的可接受性。本文以此為基點對我國公益訴訟的審判程序進行初步建構(gòu)。本文主要內(nèi)容如下:第一部分,審判程序及建構(gòu)邏輯。審判程序主要涉及審判權(quán)和訴權(quán)的行使。不同的審判程序因其訴訟客體的差異而使其當(dāng)事人訴權(quán)和法院審判權(quán)的配置有所不同。根據(jù)作為訴訟客體的糾紛的性質(zhì)來構(gòu)建審判程序就是我國民事公益訴訟審判程序建構(gòu)的基本邏輯。第二部分,傳統(tǒng)訴訟程序?qū)徖砻袷鹿嬖V訟的困境。民事公益訴訟與傳統(tǒng)訴訟因其解決的糾紛的性質(zhì)不同而適用不同的審判模式,傳統(tǒng)訴訟以“對抗·判定”為其基本結(jié)構(gòu),而民事公益訴訟各方逐漸由對抗走向協(xié)作。這種差異引發(fā)了一系列沖突,解決這些沖突是進行公益訴訟審判程序建構(gòu)的直接目的。第三部分,我國民事公益訴訟審判程序建構(gòu)。這部分是本文論述的核心,民事公益訴訟審判程序是審判程序類型之一,應(yīng)當(dāng)遵循審判程序建構(gòu)邏輯。具體內(nèi)容主要從三個方面進行,對當(dāng)事人訴權(quán)的具體設(shè)計、對法院審判權(quán)行使的具體設(shè)計以及民事公益訴訟審理后作出的裁判的既判力問題。對訴權(quán)和審判權(quán)的具體的建構(gòu)是本文的核心內(nèi)容,筆者對其進行了詳細的闡述。
[Abstract]:In our country, the cases of infringing on public interest occur frequently, and people also seek judicial remedy consciously. However, the important procedural problem of judicial remedy is that the trial procedure has not attracted the attention of the academic circles and the judicial practice circle. So far, the public interest litigation cases are still applied to the trial procedure of the traditional civil litigation. This not only brings inconvenience to the litigation activities of judges and parties, but also reduces the acceptability of adjudication results. Based on this, this paper constructs the trial procedure of public interest litigation in our country. The main contents of this paper are as follows: the first part, trial procedure and constructive logic. The trial procedure mainly involves the exercise of the jurisdiction and the right of action. The disposition of litigant's right of action and court's jurisdiction is different in different trial procedure because of the difference of its litigation object. Constructing trial procedure according to the nature of dispute as the object of litigation is the basic logic of the construction of trial procedure in civil public interest litigation in China. The second part, the predicament of the traditional procedure to try the civil public interest litigation. Civil public interest litigation and traditional litigation have different trial modes because of their different nature of disputes resolved. The traditional litigation takes "adversary judgment" as its basic structure, while the parties in civil public interest litigation gradually change from confrontation to cooperation. This kind of difference has caused a series of conflicts, resolving these conflicts is the direct purpose of constructing the trial procedure of public interest litigation. The third part, our country civil public interest lawsuit trial procedure construction. This part is the core of this article, civil public interest litigation trial procedure is one of the types of trial procedure, should follow the trial procedure construction logic. The concrete contents are mainly from three aspects: the specific design of the litigant's right of action, the specific design of the exercise of the court's jurisdiction and the res judicata of the judgment made after the trial of civil public interest litigation. The concrete construction of the right of action and jurisdiction is the core of this paper, and the author expounds it in detail.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 縱博;;對法官依職權(quán)調(diào)查取證若干理論問題的澄清[J];法律適用;2013年10期

2 包秀露;;淺析我國法官調(diào)查取證權(quán)制度所遇到的挑戰(zhàn)及完善[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(下旬);2012年04期

3 林海駿;;平等與協(xié)作:民事訴訟結(jié)構(gòu)之探討[J];中山大學(xué)研究生學(xué)刊(社會科學(xué)版);2012年01期

4 譚宗澤;楊靖文;;行政法結(jié)構(gòu)失衡與行政訴訟功能變遷——一個結(jié)構(gòu)功能主義的維度[J];西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2011年05期

5 曹明德;劉明明;;論美國告發(fā)人訴訟制度及其對我國環(huán)境治理的啟示[J];河北法學(xué);2010年11期

6 趙欣;;各國民事公益訴訟制度比較法研究[J];前沿;2010年06期

7 宋朝武;;論公益訴訟的十大基本問題[J];中國政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2010年01期

8 陳亮;;美國關(guān)于原告資格功能之爭及其對我國的啟示[J];河北法學(xué);2009年07期

9 鄧思清;;公益訴訟制度的程序構(gòu)想[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2008年02期

10 高玉珍;;論公益訴訟與私益訴訟的關(guān)系[J];社會科學(xué)論壇(學(xué)術(shù)研究卷);2007年07期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 孫記;現(xiàn)代刑事訴訟結(jié)構(gòu)論的法理學(xué)分析[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 王琳琳;我國民事訴訟中法院職權(quán)取證研究[D];華僑大學(xué);2012年

2 潘雪晴;民事公益訴訟程序研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2011年

3 李軼;舉證責(zé)任及其分配在審判實踐中的應(yīng)用[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

4 吳瑩;論我國民事訴訟審前程序之完善[D];安徽大學(xué);2006年

5 王藝華;對我國基層法院民事審判組織的研究[D];清華大學(xué);2005年

6 周清;重構(gòu)我國民事訴訟審前準(zhǔn)備程序的法律思考[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2003年

7 李鑫;民事訴訟庭前程序比較研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號：2237265