共有物分割訴訟研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-09-11 12:59
【摘要】：共有廣泛存在于我們生活的各個領(lǐng)域，有時共有導(dǎo)致共有財產(chǎn)的利用效率低下，共有人基于某些考慮要求分割共有物。關(guān)于共有物的分割各共有人可以合意進行，即達成分割協(xié)議，不能產(chǎn)生合意時，可借助法院的力量解決糾紛。在兩種分割過程中，共有人因產(chǎn)生糾紛訴至法院，即產(chǎn)生我們所謂的共有物分割訴訟（協(xié)議分割之訴和裁判分割之訴）。 共有物分割訴訟旨在消滅共有關(guān)系，由共有變更為各共有人單獨所有。共有物分割特別是裁判分割之訴，其訴訟性質(zhì)及訴訟標(biāo)的、法院審理原則和審理方式與一般訴訟不同，如何解決具體訴訟中的問題，以及共有物分割訴訟問題在理論上和實務(wù)上如何考慮，有重要的研究價值�？上У氖顷P(guān)于共有物分割的研究，著重在物權(quán)理論的探討，很少有將共有物分割的問題從訴訟法的角度進行研究。我國大陸地區(qū)關(guān)于共有物分割訴訟的文章少之又少。本文在借鑒日本及臺灣地區(qū)關(guān)于該問題的探討及現(xiàn)有形成理論的基礎(chǔ)上，結(jié)合實體法和訴訟法相關(guān)理論的分析，對共有物分割訴訟的訴訟性質(zhì)、訴訟標(biāo)的、審判方式及裁判的效力等訴訟問題進行梳理匯總，進而提出自己不成熟的看法。本文除引言和結(jié)語外，共分為四部分。 第一部分為共有物分割概述。該部分主要包括三方面：一是共有物分割的方式，包括協(xié)議分割和裁判分割。二是按份共有和共同共有的分割時間。三是共有物分割的理論基礎(chǔ)。論述了按份共有的顯在應(yīng)有部分及共同共有的潛在應(yīng)有部分。 第二部分是共有物分割訴訟的訴訟法上的基礎(chǔ)理論。首先論述了協(xié)議分割之訴和裁判分割之訴的訴訟性質(zhì)，即為給付之訴和形式上的形成之訴兼具給付之訴的性質(zhì)。在此之前，探討共有物分割請求權(quán)的性質(zhì)，認為共有物分割請求權(quán)為形成訴權(quán)。其次界定兩類訴訟的訴訟標(biāo)的，認為協(xié)議分割之訴訴訟標(biāo)的為協(xié)議上的履行請求權(quán)，裁判分割之訴訴訟標(biāo)的為形成訴權(quán)。然后就共有物分割訴訟的管轄法院問題進行闡釋。最后論述了共有物分割訴訟中當(dāng)事人制度。 第三部分是共有物分割訴訟的審理中的問題探討。主要就審判過程中的特殊審理原則和通常審理方式的修正進行闡述。具體為：一是協(xié)議分割之訴中一人或數(shù)人起訴，其訴訟請求應(yīng)是雙方互相履行協(xié)議而非僅主張對方為履行行為。而裁判分割訴訟中，論述了原告應(yīng)否表明分割方法、其應(yīng)有部分，可否請求一部分割或合并分割的問題。二是法院審判范圍的問題，即法院的審判范圍可否超出當(dāng)事人的訴訟請求的范圍。三是就裁判分割之訴而言，其訴訟費用如何分擔(dān)更為合理公平。在裁判分割之訴中適用通常原則有失公平，應(yīng)以原告訴訟可得的客觀利益為標(biāo)準(zhǔn)收取費用。四是共有物分割訴訟的二審程序的論述，具體為上訴審程序中的當(dāng)事人制度，及一部上訴時判決之全部發(fā)生移審效力的問題。 第四部分為共有物分割訴訟的裁判及裁判的效力。主要包括兩方面：一是就協(xié)議分割之訴和裁判分割之訴的判決類型及裁判分割之訴判決中分割方法的確定和內(nèi)容進行論述。二是分割裁判的效力。從判決的既判力、形成力、執(zhí)行力三方面進行闡述。著重論述了裁判分割之訴的判決是否具有執(zhí)行力的問題，本文認為裁判分割之訴的判決為含給付內(nèi)容的形成判決，，具有執(zhí)行力。為避免突襲執(zhí)行，被執(zhí)行人可提起執(zhí)行異議之訴。
[Abstract]:Common ownership exists widely in all areas of our lives. Sometimes common ownership leads to inefficient use of common property. Common owners demand the division of common property on the basis of certain considerations. In the process of partition, the co-owners bring a dispute to the court, that is, the so-called partition of common property litigation (the litigation of agreement partition and the litigation of judgment partition).
The action of division of common property aims at eliminating the relationship of common ownership and changing it from common ownership to separate ownership by each common owner. Regrettably, the study on the division of common property focuses on the theory of property rights, and seldom studies the division of common property from the perspective of procedural law. Based on the discussion of this issue and the existing theory of formation, and combined with the analysis of the relevant theories of substantive law and procedural law, this paper summarizes the litigation nature, the object of action, the way of trial and the effectiveness of adjudication of the division of common property litigation, and then puts forward its own immature views. The four part.
The first part is an overview of the division of common property. This part mainly includes three aspects: first, the way of the division of common property, including the division by agreement and judgment; second, the division time by share and common; third, the theoretical basis of the division of common property.
The second part is the basic theory of the procedure law of the action of division of common property.Firstly, it discusses the litigation nature of the action of division of agreement and the action of division of adjudication, that is, the action for payment and the action for formation of form have the nature of both the action for payment.Before that, it discusses the nature of the claim for division of common property and holds that the claim for division of common property is in form. Secondly, it defines the object of litigation of the two types of litigation, and holds that the object of litigation of agreement division is the right to claim for performance on the agreement, and the object of litigation of judgment division is the right to form litigation.
The third part is the discussion of the problems in the trial of the action of division of common property.It mainly expounds the special trial principle and the revision of the common trial method in the trial process.The first part is that in the action of division of agreement, one or more persons sue, and the claim of action should be that the two parties perform the agreement with each other instead of only advocating the other to perform the act. In the dividing action of judgment, the author discusses whether the plaintiff should indicate the dividing method, whether the plaintiff should request the dividing or merging of some parts. It is unfair to apply the general principle in the division of adjudication, and the fee should be charged on the basis of the objective benefits available to the original lawsuit.
The fourth part is the judgment and the judgment effect of the action of division of common property. It mainly includes two aspects: one is the judgment type of the action of division of agreement and the action of division of judgment, and the determination and content of the division method in the judgment of division of judgment. This paper focuses on the issue of whether the judgment of the action of division of judgment is enforceable. The judgment of the action of division of judgment is a judgment which contains the content of payment and is enforceable.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925
本文編號：2236754
[Abstract]:Common ownership exists widely in all areas of our lives. Sometimes common ownership leads to inefficient use of common property. Common owners demand the division of common property on the basis of certain considerations. In the process of partition, the co-owners bring a dispute to the court, that is, the so-called partition of common property litigation (the litigation of agreement partition and the litigation of judgment partition).
The action of division of common property aims at eliminating the relationship of common ownership and changing it from common ownership to separate ownership by each common owner. Regrettably, the study on the division of common property focuses on the theory of property rights, and seldom studies the division of common property from the perspective of procedural law. Based on the discussion of this issue and the existing theory of formation, and combined with the analysis of the relevant theories of substantive law and procedural law, this paper summarizes the litigation nature, the object of action, the way of trial and the effectiveness of adjudication of the division of common property litigation, and then puts forward its own immature views. The four part.
The first part is an overview of the division of common property. This part mainly includes three aspects: first, the way of the division of common property, including the division by agreement and judgment; second, the division time by share and common; third, the theoretical basis of the division of common property.
The second part is the basic theory of the procedure law of the action of division of common property.Firstly, it discusses the litigation nature of the action of division of agreement and the action of division of adjudication, that is, the action for payment and the action for formation of form have the nature of both the action for payment.Before that, it discusses the nature of the claim for division of common property and holds that the claim for division of common property is in form. Secondly, it defines the object of litigation of the two types of litigation, and holds that the object of litigation of agreement division is the right to claim for performance on the agreement, and the object of litigation of judgment division is the right to form litigation.
The third part is the discussion of the problems in the trial of the action of division of common property.It mainly expounds the special trial principle and the revision of the common trial method in the trial process.The first part is that in the action of division of agreement, one or more persons sue, and the claim of action should be that the two parties perform the agreement with each other instead of only advocating the other to perform the act. In the dividing action of judgment, the author discusses whether the plaintiff should indicate the dividing method, whether the plaintiff should request the dividing or merging of some parts. It is unfair to apply the general principle in the division of adjudication, and the fee should be charged on the basis of the objective benefits available to the original lawsuit.
The fourth part is the judgment and the judgment effect of the action of division of common property. It mainly includes two aspects: one is the judgment type of the action of division of agreement and the action of division of judgment, and the determination and content of the division method in the judgment of division of judgment. This paper focuses on the issue of whether the judgment of the action of division of judgment is enforceable. The judgment of the action of division of judgment is a judgment which contains the content of payment and is enforceable.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條
1 李龍;論民事判決的既判力[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;1999年04期
2 李龍;論我國民事訴訟標(biāo)的理論的基本框架[J];法學(xué);1999年07期
本文編號：2236754
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2236754.html
