【摘要】：北京知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法院作出的首例對規(guī)范性文件附帶審查的判決,將審查對象限定于規(guī)范性文件特定部分,第一次提出合法性構(gòu)成要件為主體、權(quán)限、內(nèi)容和程序四項,但只審查其中構(gòu)成爭議的要件;對于常識性的法律概念,在對其"具體應(yīng)用"解釋設(shè)定了新的權(quán)利義務(wù)或違反了法律原則時,就構(gòu)成"不合法"。該判決書對法律的理解,使相關(guān)條文內(nèi)容具體化,同時也為同類案件的審查提供了具有一定判例屬性的方向。此外,該判決也對規(guī)范性文件的司法審查在訴訟程序方面的事項,提出了如是否文面審查和是否單獨審查等一系列值得深入思考的問題。
[Abstract]:The first judgment made by the Beijing intellectual property Court on the incidental examination of normative documents limited the object of examination to specific parts of normative documents. For the first time, it proposed that the constituent elements of legality should be the subject, the authority, the content and the procedure. However, only the elements which constitute a dispute are examined; for common-sense legal concepts, it constitutes "illegality" when new rights and obligations are created for its "specific application" interpretation or when it violates the principle of law. The understanding of the law in the judgment makes the contents of the relevant articles concrete, and it also provides a certain direction of precedent for the examination of similar cases. In addition, the judgment also puts forward a series of issues worth considering deeply, such as whether to examine the text and whether to examine separately, for the judicial review of the normative documents in the aspect of litigation procedure.
【作者單位】： 上海交通大學(xué)凱原法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D926.2;D925.3
，

本文編號：2219682