【摘要】：近年來,隨著世界各國對人權(quán)保障的愈發(fā)重視,非法實物證據(jù)排除規(guī)則的構(gòu)建也引起了各國立法者和學(xué)者的普遍關(guān)注。我國雖然確立了非法實物證據(jù)排除規(guī)則,但是由于立法對于非法實物證據(jù)排除規(guī)則規(guī)范的過于籠統(tǒng)模糊,可操作性不強,加之受其他制度的影響,非法實物證據(jù)排除規(guī)則在實踐中的運用并不理想。本文通過對我國非法實物證據(jù)排除規(guī)則的立法與實踐困境進行梳理以及非對法實物證據(jù)難以排除的原因進行分析,并且在借鑒域外經(jīng)驗的基礎(chǔ)上,提出完善我國非法實物證據(jù)排除規(guī)則的建議,以期該制度能更好的服務(wù)于我國的社會。本文第一章對我國的非法實物證據(jù)排除規(guī)則的價值進行分析,包括人權(quán)保障的需要,實現(xiàn)司法公正的必然要求,借此論證非法實物排除規(guī)則在我國建立的必要性。第二章討論了我國非法實物證據(jù)排除在立法上和實踐中困境。分析了困境源自于對我國非法實物證據(jù)排除的范圍、排除條件。第三章討論非法實物證據(jù)難以排除的原因。從程序性裁判空間的缺失、案卷移送制度的影響、相互印證規(guī)則運用的形式化、證據(jù)能力和證明力關(guān)系的錯亂、公檢法三機關(guān)關(guān)系的異化五個層面進行原因分析。第四章指出完善我國非法實物證據(jù)排除規(guī)則可從擴大非法實物證據(jù)的排除范圍、完善非法實物證據(jù)排除規(guī)則的條件、建立獨立的程序性裁判空間、明確非法實物證據(jù)的排除基點。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the increasing attention paid to the protection of human rights in the world, the construction of the rule of exclusion of illegal physical evidence has also aroused the general concern of legislators and scholars in various countries. Although our country has established the illegal physical evidence exclusion rule, but because the legislation to the illegal physical evidence exclusion rule norm is too general and vague, the operability is not strong, in addition to the influence of other systems. The application of the exclusion rule of illegal physical evidence in practice is not ideal. This paper analyzes the legislative and practical dilemma of the exclusion rules of illegal physical evidence in our country, and analyzes the reasons why it is difficult to exclude the legal material evidence, and on the basis of drawing lessons from the extraterritorial experience, This paper puts forward some suggestions to perfect the exclusion rules of illegal physical evidence in order to serve our society better. The first chapter analyzes the value of the exclusionary rule of illegal physical evidence in our country, including the need of human rights protection, the inevitable requirement of realizing judicial justice, and thus demonstrates the necessity of establishing the rule of illegal material object exclusion in our country. The second chapter discusses the dilemma of illegal physical evidence exclusion in legislation and practice. This paper analyzes the scope and conditions of the exclusion of illegal physical evidence in China. The third chapter discusses the reasons why illegal physical evidence is difficult to rule out. The reasons are analyzed from the following five aspects: the absence of procedural adjudication space, the influence of case file transfer system, the formalization of the application of mutual corroboration rules, the disorder of the relationship between the ability of evidence and the power of proof, and the alienation of the relationship among the three organs of the Public Security Bureau, the Procuratorate and the Court. The fourth chapter points out that perfecting the exclusion rules of illegal physical evidence in our country can expand the exclusion scope of illegal physical evidence, perfect the conditions of the exclusion rules of illegal physical evidence, and establish an independent procedural adjudication space. To clarify the exclusion basis of illegal physical evidence.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周洪波;;中國刑事印證理論批判[J];法學(xué)研究;2015年06期

2 樊崇義;;“以審判為中心”與“分工負責(zé)、互相配合、互相制約”關(guān)系論[J];法學(xué)雜志;2015年11期

3 龍宗智;;庭審實質(zhì)化的路徑和方法[J];法學(xué)研究;2015年05期

4 楊波;;由證明力到證據(jù)能力——我國非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則的實踐困境與出路[J];政法論壇;2015年05期

5 朱錫平;;印證還是心證:刑事質(zhì)證的迷局與解困[J];犯罪研究;2014年05期

6 縱博;;證明力反制證據(jù)能力論[J];中國刑事法雜志;2014年04期

7 葉青;;庭前會議中非法證據(jù)的處理[J];國家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2014年04期

8 郭旭;;德國搜查扣押制度與非法實物證據(jù)排除[J];武陵學(xué)刊;2014年04期

9 萬毅;;關(guān)鍵詞解讀:非法實物證據(jù)排除規(guī)則的解釋與適用[J];四川大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2014年03期

10 閔春雷;楊波;謝登科;賈志強;;東北三省檢察機關(guān)新刑訴法實施調(diào)研報告[J];國家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2014年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 杜學(xué)毅;中國非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則構(gòu)建研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張堯;論非法實物證據(jù)的排除[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：2218273