【摘要】：隨著社會的發(fā)展、民事主體法律意識的不斷提高,訴訟在糾紛的解決中發(fā)揮重要作用。民事訴訟原本是自然人、法人和其他組織等平等主體依靠司法強(qiáng)制力解決民事糾紛、維護(hù)權(quán)益的一種方式。近年來,一些不法分子利用法律的空白與漏洞,惡意串通虛構(gòu)不存在的法律關(guān)系和事實、偽造證據(jù),在表面合法的訴訟形式下,通過虛假自認(rèn)、虛假調(diào)解等訴訟行為,欺騙法院作出錯誤的裁判或調(diào)解,以實現(xiàn)其非法目的。這種訴訟就是虛假訴訟,其本質(zhì)特征為當(dāng)事人訴諸法院解決的糾紛是虛假的。虛假訴訟不僅侵害他人合法利益,還會損害司法權(quán)威、浪費司法資源。面對虛假訴訟持續(xù)“升溫”的態(tài)勢,學(xué)界和實務(wù)界對虛假訴訟的防范與治理均日益重視�！睹袷略V訟法》將誠實信用原則明文化、法定化以及《刑法修正案(九)》增加虛假訴訟罪,對虛假訴訟的規(guī)制具有重要意義。本文從虛假訴訟的概念入手,分析其產(chǎn)生的原因,結(jié)合司法實踐中虛假訴訟的案件類型,從程序法的角度提出規(guī)制虛假訴訟的建議。
[Abstract]:With the development of society and the improvement of the legal consciousness of civil subjects, litigation plays an important role in the settlement of disputes. Civil litigation is originally a way for natural persons, legal persons and other organizations to rely on judicial coercion to solve civil disputes and safeguard their rights and interests. In recent years, some lawbreakers have exploited gaps and loopholes in the law, maliciously colluded with fictional legal relations and facts, falsified evidence, and through false self-admission, false mediation, and other litigation acts under the apparently legitimate form of litigation. To deceive a court into making a wrong decision or mediation in order to achieve its unlawful purpose. This kind of lawsuit is a false lawsuit, whose essential characteristic is that the dispute that the litigant applies to the court to resolve is false. False litigation not only infringes the legitimate interests of others, but also damages judicial authority and wastes judicial resources. In the face of the situation of "heating up" continuously in false litigation, the academic and practical circles pay more and more attention to the prevention and management of false litigation. The legalization and the increase of the crime of false litigation in Criminal Law Amendment (9) are of great significance to the regulation of false litigation. This article starts with the concept of false litigation, analyzes the causes of its emergence, combines the types of cases of false litigation in judicial practice, and puts forward some suggestions for regulating false litigation from the point of view of procedural law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李浩;;虛假訴訟與對調(diào)解書的檢察監(jiān)督[J];法學(xué)家;2014年06期

2 任重;;論虛假訴訟:兼評我國第三人撤銷訴訟實踐[J];中國法學(xué);2014年06期

3 邢和平;;淺議虛假訴訟中檢察監(jiān)督的完善[J];中國檢察官;2014年17期

4 張衛(wèi)平;;中國第三人撤銷之訴的制度構(gòu)成與適用[J];中外法學(xué);2013年01期

5 鄧嶸;;虛假訴訟的模型化識別及防范治理——基于訴訟結(jié)構(gòu)的視角[J];福建警察學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年01期

6 宋朝武;;虛假訴訟法律規(guī)制的理性思考[J];河南社會科學(xué);2012年12期

7 盧建平;任江海;;虛假訴訟的定罪問題探究——以2012年《民事訴訟法》修正案為視角[J];政治與法律;2012年11期

8 吳大華;王曉偉;;訴訟欺詐行為概念辨析[J];法治研究;2012年11期

9 張衛(wèi)平;;第三人撤銷判決制度的分析與評估[J];比較法研究;2012年05期

10 朱健;;論虛假訴訟及其法律規(guī)制[J];法律適用;2012年06期

，

本文編號：2210953