【摘要】：程序決定著公正。刑事律師辯護(hù)權(quán)的保障直接影響著訴訟程序能否公正的進(jìn)行,更與公民的合法權(quán)利是否會受到公私權(quán)力的恣意侵犯緊密相關(guān)。很長一段時間,在法律制度和司法實務(wù)中,刑事律師的辯護(hù)權(quán)問題一直處于尷尬局面。相關(guān)立法機(jī)關(guān)雖然制定了一系列保障律師權(quán)利的法律法規(guī),但從權(quán)利實踐現(xiàn)狀來看,在很大的程度上還是治標(biāo)不治本。而樹立正確的權(quán)利本位觀念已成為一種趨勢,不僅保護(hù)了律師的辯護(hù)權(quán),并且體現(xiàn)了被追訴人的人權(quán)保障。國家應(yīng)從制度上強(qiáng)化對公權(quán)力的制約,防止權(quán)力過度膨脹濫用而侵害律師合法權(quán)利的行使,完善權(quán)力制約機(jī)制,在實踐中監(jiān)督司法機(jī)關(guān)、行政機(jī)關(guān)依法行使職權(quán),保障律師權(quán)利,以期提高律師投身訴訟活動的積極性,進(jìn)一步推進(jìn)我國的司法文明建設(shè)。本文立足新刑訴實施以后的訴訟現(xiàn)狀,分五個章節(jié)敘述律師辯護(hù)權(quán),第一章緒論,主要闡述國內(nèi)外律師辯護(hù)權(quán)的相關(guān)法律制度;第二章具體介紹會見通信權(quán)、閱卷權(quán)和調(diào)查取證權(quán)從1996年刑訴、2008年新《律師法》到2012年新刑訴以來的發(fā)展變化,直觀了解辯護(hù)權(quán)的內(nèi)容;第三章分析目前訴訟活動中會見權(quán)、閱卷權(quán)和調(diào)查取證權(quán)在法律制度上和實踐中的進(jìn)步性與存在的問題及表現(xiàn),也是本文的核心內(nèi)容;第四章從宏觀、微觀角度剖析出現(xiàn)上述問題的原因,宏觀角度有司法環(huán)境、訴訟體制、立法缺陷、濫用執(zhí)法權(quán)和律協(xié)律所管理有限五個方面,微觀則是從律師隊伍自身找原因,第五章是面對這些問題,針對癥結(jié),提出改善的想法、建議,以謀求法律法規(guī)規(guī)定的律師辯護(hù)權(quán)能得到真正意義上的實現(xiàn),而不是紙上談兵。
[Abstract]:Procedure determines justice. The guarantee of the criminal lawyer's right of defense directly affects whether the procedure can be carried out fairly, and it is closely related to whether the citizen's legal rights will be infringed by the public and private rights. For a long time, in the legal system and judicial practice, the defense rights of criminal lawyers have been in an awkward situation. Although the relevant legislative organs have formulated a series of laws and regulations to protect the rights of lawyers, but from the current situation of practice of rights, to a large extent, it is still to a large extent to deal with the symptoms and not the root causes. It has become a trend to establish the right standard concept, which not only protects the lawyer's right to defense, but also embodies the human rights guarantee of the accused. The state should strengthen the restriction on the public power from the system, prevent the excessive expansion and abuse of the power and encroach on the exercise of the lawyer's legal right, perfect the power restriction mechanism, supervise the judicial organ and the administrative organ to exercise their functions and powers according to law in practice. To protect lawyers' rights, to improve the enthusiasm of lawyers to participate in litigation activities, and to further promote the construction of judicial civilization in China. Based on the status quo of the litigation after the implementation of the new criminal suit, this paper describes the lawyer's right to defense in five chapters, the first chapter is an introduction, mainly describes the domestic and foreign lawyers' right to defend the relevant legal system; the second chapter specifically introduces the right to meet with the communication, The rights of reading papers and collecting evidence from 1996, 2008, 2008 to 2012, the development and changes of the right to defense, the third chapter analyzes the right to meet in the current litigation activities, It is also the core content of this paper to analyze the reasons of the above problems from the macro and micro angles, and the judicial environment from the macro and micro angles. The progress and the existing problems and the performance of the right of marking and collecting evidence in the legal system and in practice are also the core contents of this paper, the fourth chapter analyzes the reasons for the above problems from the macro and micro angles. There are five aspects of litigation system, legislative defects, abuse of law enforcement power and limited management of the law association law firms. In the fifth chapter, in the face of these problems, we put forward some ideas and suggestions for improvement in the face of these problems. In order to seek the lawyer's right of defense as stipulated by laws and regulations, it can be realized in real sense rather than on paper.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陶寶玉;;淺論辯護(hù)律師閱卷權(quán)制度的完善[J];法制博覽;2016年02期

2 胡瑋瑤;;論刑事訴訟中辯方違法取證的責(zé)任追究——以“放寬下限制”為改革進(jìn)路[J];寧夏大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2015年06期

3 林琳;;辯護(hù)律師權(quán)利的保障與救濟(jì)——以我國新《刑事訴訟法》背景下檢察機(jī)關(guān)發(fā)揮法律監(jiān)督為視角[J];法學(xué)雜志;2015年11期

4 陳琪瑩;;論律師權(quán)利保障——以法官與律師關(guān)系為視角[J];法制與社會;2015年23期

5 孫遠(yuǎn);;論偵查階段辯護(hù)律師的閱卷權(quán)[J];法律適用;2015年02期

6 何朔;;律師會見權(quán)的限制與保障——以“特別重大賄賂犯罪案件”為例[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2014年10期

7 楊曉靜;丁延松;常明明;;偵查階段辯護(hù)律師調(diào)查取證權(quán)行使的界域及律師執(zhí)業(yè)規(guī)范導(dǎo)引[J];山東社會科學(xué);2014年10期

8 劉天龍;;試論新刑訴法視野下新型檢律關(guān)系的構(gòu)建[J];老區(qū)建設(shè);2014年18期

9 陳瑞華;;辯護(hù)律師調(diào)查取證的三種模式[J];法商研究;2014年01期

10 黃文旭;袁博;周嫣;;論刑事辯護(hù)律師會見權(quán)的實現(xiàn)[J];中國刑事法雜志;2013年12期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前7條

1 趙春艷;;最高法發(fā)布《依法切實保障律師訴訟權(quán)利的規(guī)定》[N];民主與法制時報;2016年

2 羅書臻;;依法切實保障律師訴訟權(quán)利[N];人民法院報;2016年

3 陳光中;;推進(jìn)“以審判為中心”改革的幾個問題[N];人民法院報;2015年

4 于欣華;王濤;;律師刑事辯護(hù)權(quán)淺議[N];法制日報;2012年

5 劉金林;;“法律的生命在于不折不扣地實施”[N];檢察日報;2012年

6 陳衛(wèi)東;;辯護(hù)權(quán)的發(fā)展完善與刑訴法再修改[N];法制日報;2011年

7 劉文;;刑訴法修改應(yīng)建立證據(jù)展示制度[N];民主與法制時報;2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 丁亞紅;審判中心視域下我國偵檢關(guān)系定位研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2016年

2 王瓊;辯護(hù)律師的調(diào)查取證權(quán)[D];華東政法大學(xué);2014年

3 楊倩倩;探析刑辯律師的執(zhí)業(yè)困境及其風(fēng)險防范[D];安徽大學(xué);2014年

4 趙玉靜;辯護(hù)律師調(diào)查取證權(quán)研究[D];山東大學(xué);2012年

5 姜洪濤;我國辯護(hù)律師調(diào)查取證權(quán)的救濟(jì)、保障與規(guī)范[D];中國政法大學(xué);2010年

6 劉穎異;論刑事訴訟中律師的調(diào)查取證權(quán)[D];西南政法大學(xué);2008年

7 鄧心剛;論我國辯護(hù)律師的權(quán)利及完善[D];中國政法大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：2199048