【摘要】：近年來犯罪活動日益復(fù)雜化、科技化,傳統(tǒng)的偵查措施在偵破犯罪案件時往往顯得捉襟見肘,為有效的偵破案件,新型的偵查措施如技術(shù)偵查措施等應(yīng)運(yùn)而生,網(wǎng)絡(luò)監(jiān)控、秘密辨認(rèn)、臥底偵查、通訊監(jiān)聽等手段在偵查犯罪案件的過程中發(fā)揮著巨大的作用。 通訊監(jiān)聽作為一種技術(shù)偵查手段,具有隱蔽性、強(qiáng)制性、科技性等特征,在搜集犯罪證據(jù)、抓捕犯罪嫌疑人方面發(fā)揮著巨大的作用,但同時通訊監(jiān)聽對憲法規(guī)定的公民基本權(quán)利造成嚴(yán)重侵犯,為了協(xié)調(diào)打擊犯罪和保護(hù)公民權(quán)利的關(guān)系,應(yīng)將其納入法制化軌道。我國刑事訴訟法設(shè)置專門章節(jié)規(guī)定了技術(shù)偵查措施,并沒有對通訊監(jiān)聽進(jìn)行專門的規(guī)定,目前我國適用通訊監(jiān)聽的主要依據(jù)是刑事訴訟法有關(guān)技術(shù)偵查措施的規(guī)定。目前我國在實(shí)施通訊監(jiān)聽的過程中,由于有關(guān)規(guī)定過于簡單,程序存在不規(guī)范之處,在現(xiàn)實(shí)情況中可能造成對公民基本權(quán)利的嚴(yán)重侵犯。本文通過總結(jié)借鑒域外有關(guān)通訊監(jiān)聽的經(jīng)驗(yàn),比如堅(jiān)持重罪原則、司法令狀原則、最小侵害原則、權(quán)利保障原則,對我國通訊監(jiān)聽在適用范圍、審批主體、適用程序、通知報(bào)告義務(wù)、證據(jù)能力問題、救濟(jì)程序等方面提出完善的建議。 本文共分為四章： 第一章是通訊監(jiān)聽的概念和特點(diǎn),分析了通訊監(jiān)聽的概念和特點(diǎn)。第二章是通訊監(jiān)聽的內(nèi)在沖突,分析了通訊監(jiān)聽的適當(dāng)性、危害性以及對其進(jìn)行法律規(guī)制的必要性。第三章是域外通訊監(jiān)聽制度的比較考察,主要考察了美國、德國、臺灣地區(qū)通訊監(jiān)聽制度的現(xiàn)狀以及對域外通訊監(jiān)聽制度的總結(jié)、評價。第四章是我國通訊監(jiān)聽制度：現(xiàn)狀及完善,主要探討了我國通訊監(jiān)聽制度存在的問題,并基于實(shí)踐情況對我國通訊監(jiān)聽制度提出了完善建議。
[Abstract]:In recent years, criminal activities are becoming more and more complicated and scientific and technological. Traditional investigative measures are often overstretched in detecting crime cases. In order to solve cases effectively, new investigative measures, such as technical investigation measures, have emerged as the times require, and network monitoring has emerged. Secret identification, undercover investigation, communication monitoring and other means play a great role in the investigation of criminal cases. As a means of technical investigation, communication monitoring has the characteristics of concealment, compulsion, science and technology. It plays a great role in collecting criminal evidence and arresting criminal suspects. However, at the same time, the monitoring of communication seriously infringes on the basic rights of citizens stipulated in the Constitution. In order to coordinate the relationship between fighting crime and protecting the rights of citizens, it should be brought into the orbit of legalization. The special section of our country's criminal procedure law stipulates the technical investigation measure, and does not carry on the special stipulation to the communication monitor, at present our country applies the communication monitor the main basis is the criminal procedure law related technical investigation measure stipulation. At present, in the process of implementing communication monitoring in our country, because the relevant regulations are too simple, there are some irregularities in the procedure, which may cause serious infringement on the basic rights of citizens in reality. By summing up and drawing lessons from the experiences of foreign communication surveillance, such as upholding the principle of felony, judicial writ, minimum infringement, right protection, this paper applies to the scope of application, the subject of examination and approval, and the applicable procedure of communication monitoring in our country. Advice on reporting obligation, evidence capacity, remedy procedure and so on. This paper is divided into four chapters: the first chapter is the concept and characteristics of communication monitoring, and analyzes the concept and characteristics of communication monitoring. The second chapter is the internal conflict of communication monitoring, analyzes the appropriateness and harmfulness of communication monitoring and the necessity of legal regulation. The third chapter is the comparative investigation of the foreign communication monitoring system. It mainly examines the current situation of the communication monitoring system in the United States, Germany and Taiwan, as well as the summary and evaluation of the extraterritorial communication monitoring system. The fourth chapter is the communication monitoring system of our country: the present situation and the consummation, mainly discussed our country communication monitoring system existence question, and based on the practice situation proposed the consummation suggestion to our country communication monitoring system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 彭勃;論監(jiān)聽作為偵查手段的法律問題[J];法商研究;2002年06期

2 鄧立軍;;臺灣地區(qū)通訊監(jiān)察制度:現(xiàn)狀與前景[J];中國人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2009年06期

3 詹建紅;;理論共識與規(guī)則細(xì)化:技術(shù)偵查措施的司法適用[J];法商研究;2013年03期

4 章禮明;我國通訊監(jiān)聽訴訟規(guī)則之建構(gòu)[J];河北法學(xué);2004年01期

5 劉弘陽;何霞;;論我國電訊監(jiān)聽措施法律監(jiān)督制度的重構(gòu)[J];河北法學(xué);2013年10期

6 王方;;技術(shù)偵查行為價值取向及其實(shí)現(xiàn)路徑研究——以新刑事訴訟法為背景[J];暨南學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2014年01期

7 上官春光;;臺灣通訊監(jiān)察制度及其借鑒意義[J];國家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年06期

8 周長軍;;語境與困境:偵查程序完善的未竟課題[J];政法論壇;2012年05期

9 蘭躍軍;;比較法視野中的技術(shù)偵查措施[J];中國刑事法雜志;2013年01期

，

本文編號：2192649