我國行政訴訟檢察監(jiān)督制度存在的問題及完善
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-04 09:10
【摘要】：行政訴訟制度將傳統(tǒng)觀念中高高在上的權力平放到公眾的權利面前，對于我國法治發(fā)展和法治建設具有里程碑式的意義。但是，在實踐運行中，行政訴訟的立法目的并沒有充分實現(xiàn)，因此需要建立一種合理的、行之有效的監(jiān)督方式來監(jiān)督行政權力的運行和法院的審理活動，進而確保行政訴訟順利進行。在這種背景下，行政訴訟檢察監(jiān)督制度應運而生。行政訴訟檢察監(jiān)督有助于行政訴訟的提起、有助于規(guī)范行政訴訟活動、有助于促進行政工作法治化進程、有助于公民法治意識的形成。并且在推進依法治國、保障人權，，推動我國社會主義市場經(jīng)濟建設方面發(fā)揮了重要作用。這項制度不僅符合我國發(fā)展社會主義市場經(jīng)濟的需要，也符合我國構建和諧社會的需求。 但是，伴隨著民主化進程的推進和民眾價值選擇的多樣，對于行政訴訟檢察監(jiān)督制度的評判的價值評判標準也多元起來。社會轉型期的陣痛深刻的影響到了這項制度的構建，也使得制度本身的缺陷和不足擴大起來，進而限制了該制度的運作效果，更使得公眾對這一制度變得懷疑與不信任。因此在肯定該制度的價值與正當性的前提下，更應該正視問題的存在，進而提出對策完善相關制度，這對于增強檢察監(jiān)督的效果獲取公眾認同，有著理論與實際的雙重價值。另外，需要強調的是，筆者所主張的是能夠促進經(jīng)濟與社會平穩(wěn)發(fā)展的改革，如果因為法制化與民主化進程推進太快，而導致的經(jīng)濟發(fā)展停滯甚至倒退或者是造成社會混亂也是不允許的。 筆者通過分析行政訴訟檢察監(jiān)督制度的內(nèi)涵進而引出了對該制度的必要性及作用的探討，分析了我國現(xiàn)行行政訴訟檢察監(jiān)督制度中存在的問題，支持行政訴訟檢察監(jiān)督制度應繼續(xù)存在并且應當進一步加強的主張，提出通過完善立法的方式，拓寬行政訴訟檢察監(jiān)督范圍、增加行政訴訟檢察監(jiān)督的方式等手段來完善我國行政訴訟檢察監(jiān)督制度。
[Abstract]:The administrative litigation system puts the high power in the traditional concept in front of the public rights, which is of milestone significance to the development and construction of the rule of law in our country. However, in practice, the legislative purpose of administrative litigation has not been fully realized. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a reasonable and effective way of supervision to supervise the operation of administrative power and the trial activities of the courts. And then ensure the smooth progress of administrative proceedings. Under this background, the administrative litigation procuratorial supervision system arises at the historic moment. The procuratorial supervision of administrative litigation is helpful to the institution of administrative proceedings, to standardizing administrative litigation activities, to promoting the process of the rule of law in administrative work, and to the formation of citizens' awareness of the rule of law. It plays an important role in promoting the rule of law, protecting human rights and promoting the construction of socialist market economy. This system not only meets the need of developing socialist market economy, but also meets the demand of constructing harmonious society. However, with the advancement of democratization process and the diversity of people's value choice, the evaluation criteria for the procuratorial supervision system of administrative litigation are also diversified. The labor pain in the social transition period has deeply affected the construction of the system, and also made the defects and shortcomings of the system expand, and then restricted the operating effect of the system, and made the public become suspicious and distrust of the system. Therefore, under the premise of affirming the value and legitimacy of the system, we should face the existence of the problem squarely, and then put forward countermeasures to perfect the relevant system, which has the dual value of theory and practice to enhance the effect of procuratorial supervision to gain public approval. In addition, it should be emphasized that what the author advocates is a reform that can promote the smooth development of the economy and society. If the process of legalization and democratization advances too quickly, The resulting economic stagnation or even retrogression or social chaos is not allowed. By analyzing the connotation of the procuratorial supervision system in administrative litigation, the author discusses the necessity and function of the system, and analyzes the problems existing in the current procuratorial supervision system of administrative litigation in China. Supporting the continued existence and further strengthening of the procuratorial and supervisory system in administrative litigation, and proposing to broaden the scope of procuratorial supervision in administrative litigation by improving the legislative approach, To improve the procuratorial supervision system of administrative litigation by increasing the way of procuratorial supervision in administrative litigation.
【學位授予單位】：吉林大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.3
本文編號：2163340
[Abstract]:The administrative litigation system puts the high power in the traditional concept in front of the public rights, which is of milestone significance to the development and construction of the rule of law in our country. However, in practice, the legislative purpose of administrative litigation has not been fully realized. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a reasonable and effective way of supervision to supervise the operation of administrative power and the trial activities of the courts. And then ensure the smooth progress of administrative proceedings. Under this background, the administrative litigation procuratorial supervision system arises at the historic moment. The procuratorial supervision of administrative litigation is helpful to the institution of administrative proceedings, to standardizing administrative litigation activities, to promoting the process of the rule of law in administrative work, and to the formation of citizens' awareness of the rule of law. It plays an important role in promoting the rule of law, protecting human rights and promoting the construction of socialist market economy. This system not only meets the need of developing socialist market economy, but also meets the demand of constructing harmonious society. However, with the advancement of democratization process and the diversity of people's value choice, the evaluation criteria for the procuratorial supervision system of administrative litigation are also diversified. The labor pain in the social transition period has deeply affected the construction of the system, and also made the defects and shortcomings of the system expand, and then restricted the operating effect of the system, and made the public become suspicious and distrust of the system. Therefore, under the premise of affirming the value and legitimacy of the system, we should face the existence of the problem squarely, and then put forward countermeasures to perfect the relevant system, which has the dual value of theory and practice to enhance the effect of procuratorial supervision to gain public approval. In addition, it should be emphasized that what the author advocates is a reform that can promote the smooth development of the economy and society. If the process of legalization and democratization advances too quickly, The resulting economic stagnation or even retrogression or social chaos is not allowed. By analyzing the connotation of the procuratorial supervision system in administrative litigation, the author discusses the necessity and function of the system, and analyzes the problems existing in the current procuratorial supervision system of administrative litigation in China. Supporting the continued existence and further strengthening of the procuratorial and supervisory system in administrative litigation, and proposing to broaden the scope of procuratorial supervision in administrative litigation by improving the legislative approach, To improve the procuratorial supervision system of administrative litigation by increasing the way of procuratorial supervision in administrative litigation.
【學位授予單位】：吉林大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.3
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 姜明安;;行政訴訟中的檢察監(jiān)督與行政公益訴訟[J];法學雜志;2006年02期
2 常怡;重慶市、海南省人民檢察院聯(lián)合課題組;;民事行政裁判執(zhí)行的檢察監(jiān)督[J];法學家;2006年04期
3 黃學賢;;行政訴訟撤訴若干問題探討[J];法學;2010年10期
4 李蕾;肖國鵬;;行政訴訟檢察監(jiān)督論[J];甘肅政法成人教育學院學報;2005年04期
5 吳衛(wèi)東;;行政訴訟中檢察監(jiān)督權力的完善性擴張[J];湖北行政學院學報;2006年04期
6 陳潔芳;當前行政訴訟檢察監(jiān)督制度的完善[J];檢察實踐;2004年01期
7 李學林;;檢察建議在司法實踐中的困境與出路[J];中國檢察官;2006年06期
8 湛中樂,孫占京;論檢察機關對行政訴訟的法律監(jiān)督[J];法學研究;1994年01期
9 楊立新;民事行政訴訟檢察監(jiān)督與司法公正[J];法學研究;2000年04期
10 黃松有;檢察監(jiān)督與審判獨立[J];法學研究;2000年04期
本文編號：2163340
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2163340.html
