民事訴訟送達瑕疵問題研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-04 11:04
【摘要】：送達作為連接法院訴訟行為與當(dāng)事人訴訟行為之間的橋梁，在憲法和程序法上有著重要的意義。送達一方面可以保障當(dāng)事人訴訟權(quán)利的行使和實現(xiàn)，一方面又能保障訴訟活動的順利進行。我國法院在實踐中不乏各類送達瑕疵的情況，我們應(yīng)當(dāng)對此問題給予充分關(guān)注，因為對送達瑕疵是否合法有效這個問題的回答將直接影響后續(xù)訴訟行為乃至裁判行為的效力認定。本文寫作的意義在于通過對送達瑕疵問題的分析，厘清對送達瑕疵的效力認定以及對瑕疵之治愈等問題。 本文由引言、正文和結(jié)語三個部分組成，其中正文分為以下四個部分： 第一部分對送達瑕疵所涉基礎(chǔ)問題進行探討，涉及以下三個方面，分別是送達的含義和性質(zhì)、送達瑕疵的定義以及送達瑕疵與送達的關(guān)系。其中重點部分為界定二者關(guān)系的段落，在該部分中分析到送達所必須具備的成立要件和生效要件，對該問題的梳理是下文論述瑕疵送達現(xiàn)象類型化和效力認定的基礎(chǔ)。 第二部分對實踐中各類送達瑕疵現(xiàn)象進行類型化的整理，，并分析造成送達瑕疵現(xiàn)象的原因。對送達瑕疵行為的類型劃分基于前文對送達生效要件的界定，分為送達對象的瑕疵、送達所涉文書的瑕疵、送達時空的瑕疵以及送達方式的瑕疵，其中送達方式瑕疵又包括送達方式的濫用、送達方式采用的途徑混亂以及各送達方式適用對象不清晰。在對瑕疵現(xiàn)象進行類型化整理之后，本文從立法、司法和社會三個角度分析造成送達瑕疵現(xiàn)象頻發(fā)的原因。 第三部分分析送達瑕疵效力的判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及其認定。此部分也是本論文最為重要和創(chuàng)新的部分。在該部分中首先明確關(guān)于送達瑕疵效力的判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，再對各類送達瑕疵行為進行效力認定，是根據(jù)第二部分中的類型劃分分別論述。效力判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)在對刑事訴訟學(xué)科借鑒基礎(chǔ)上形成，根據(jù)瑕疵違反的是實體性規(guī)則還是程序性規(guī)則認定為不同的效力。對各類送達瑕疵現(xiàn)象進行效力認定時，在根據(jù)上述所列判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的基礎(chǔ)上，還借鑒我國臺灣地區(qū)以及其他大陸法系國家的相關(guān)立法和司法現(xiàn)狀，再結(jié)合我國司法實踐，確認不同送達瑕疵產(chǎn)生的效力。 第四部分論述對送達瑕疵的救濟。有權(quán)利就有救濟，否則權(quán)利的存在最終會成為一紙空文。根據(jù)法院送達行為的性質(zhì)，本文最終確認三種救濟途徑，分別是無瑕疵送達的實施、當(dāng)事人責(zé)問權(quán)的行使以及司法監(jiān)督方式救濟。
[Abstract]:As a bridge between litigant action and litigant action, service plays an important role in constitution and procedure law. On the one hand, service can guarantee the exercise and realization of litigant's right, on the other hand, it can guarantee the smooth progress of litigation. There is no shortage of defects in service in our courts in practice, and we should pay full attention to this issue. Because the answer to the question whether the service defect is legal or effective will directly affect the validity of the subsequent litigation and even the adjudication. The significance of this paper is to clarify the validity of service defects and the healing of defects through the analysis of service defects. This paper is composed of three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, in which the text is divided into the following four parts: the first part discusses the basic issues involved in the flaw of service, involving the following three aspects, respectively, the meaning and nature of service, The definition of service defect and the relationship between service defect and service. The key part is the section that defines the relationship between the two. In this part, the author analyzes the essential elements and the effective elements of service. The carding of this problem is the basis of the classification and validity of the phenomenon of defective service. The second part classifies all kinds of service defects in practice and analyzes the causes of service defects. On the basis of the definition of the effective elements of service, the types of service defects are divided into the defects of the object of service, the defects of the documents involved, the defects of service time and space, and the defects of the mode of service. The defects of service mode include abuse of service mode, confusion of service way and unclear object of service mode. After classifying defects, this paper analyzes the causes of frequent service defects from the perspectives of legislation, judicature and society. The third part analyzes the judgment standard and its determination of the effectiveness of service defects. This part is also the most important and innovative part of this paper. In this part, we first define the judgment standard about the validity of service defects, and then determine the validity of all kinds of service defects, which is discussed separately according to the types in the second part. The criterion of validity judgment is formed on the basis of reference to the subject of criminal procedure, according to whether the defect violates the substantive rule or the procedural rule. On the basis of the judgment criteria listed above, we also draw lessons from the relevant legislation and judicial status of Taiwan and other civil law countries, and then combine the judicial practice of our country. To confirm the validity of different service defects. The fourth part discusses the remedy to the defect of service. Have the right to have relief, otherwise the existence of the right will eventually become a dead letter. According to the nature of the act of court service, this paper finally confirms the three ways of relief, which are the implementation of the flawless service, the exercise of the party's right to question and the relief of the judicial supervision.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1
本文編號：2163759
[Abstract]:As a bridge between litigant action and litigant action, service plays an important role in constitution and procedure law. On the one hand, service can guarantee the exercise and realization of litigant's right, on the other hand, it can guarantee the smooth progress of litigation. There is no shortage of defects in service in our courts in practice, and we should pay full attention to this issue. Because the answer to the question whether the service defect is legal or effective will directly affect the validity of the subsequent litigation and even the adjudication. The significance of this paper is to clarify the validity of service defects and the healing of defects through the analysis of service defects. This paper is composed of three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, in which the text is divided into the following four parts: the first part discusses the basic issues involved in the flaw of service, involving the following three aspects, respectively, the meaning and nature of service, The definition of service defect and the relationship between service defect and service. The key part is the section that defines the relationship between the two. In this part, the author analyzes the essential elements and the effective elements of service. The carding of this problem is the basis of the classification and validity of the phenomenon of defective service. The second part classifies all kinds of service defects in practice and analyzes the causes of service defects. On the basis of the definition of the effective elements of service, the types of service defects are divided into the defects of the object of service, the defects of the documents involved, the defects of service time and space, and the defects of the mode of service. The defects of service mode include abuse of service mode, confusion of service way and unclear object of service mode. After classifying defects, this paper analyzes the causes of frequent service defects from the perspectives of legislation, judicature and society. The third part analyzes the judgment standard and its determination of the effectiveness of service defects. This part is also the most important and innovative part of this paper. In this part, we first define the judgment standard about the validity of service defects, and then determine the validity of all kinds of service defects, which is discussed separately according to the types in the second part. The criterion of validity judgment is formed on the basis of reference to the subject of criminal procedure, according to whether the defect violates the substantive rule or the procedural rule. On the basis of the judgment criteria listed above, we also draw lessons from the relevant legislation and judicial status of Taiwan and other civil law countries, and then combine the judicial practice of our country. To confirm the validity of different service defects. The fourth part discusses the remedy to the defect of service. Have the right to have relief, otherwise the existence of the right will eventually become a dead letter. According to the nature of the act of court service, this paper finally confirms the three ways of relief, which are the implementation of the flawless service, the exercise of the party's right to question and the relief of the judicial supervision.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條
1 王福華;民事送達制度正當(dāng)化原理[J];法商研究;2003年04期
2 廖永安;;法院訴訟行為要論[J];法學(xué)家;2003年02期
3 宋朝武;;民事電子送達問題研究[J];法學(xué)家;2008年06期
4 郭銳;羅鵬;;對送達程序違法的檢察監(jiān)督[J];中國檢察官;2011年16期
5 宋朝武;;電子司法的實踐運用與制度碰撞[J];中國政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2011年06期
6 廖永安;胡軍輝;;試論我國民事公告送達制度的改革與完善[J];太平洋學(xué)報;2007年11期
7 高詠梅;;百案送達程序調(diào)查報告[J];山東審判;2007年04期
本文編號：2163759
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2163759.html
