我國環(huán)境行政司法的功能與現(xiàn)狀——基于環(huán)境保護行政案件二十大典型案例的文本分析
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-02 21:10
【摘要】：環(huán)境行政訴訟是環(huán)境行政司法參與環(huán)境治理的主要手段。通過回顧最高人民法院公布的兩批環(huán)境保護行政訴訟典型案例,得出當(dāng)前環(huán)境行政司法表現(xiàn)為訴訟案由單一、上訴率高、原告敗訴率高等特點。以功能主義視角分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)環(huán)境行政司法的實然功能是維護環(huán)保部門依法行政、解釋環(huán)保相關(guān)法律法規(guī)和推動環(huán)保公共事務(wù)治理。盡管公眾對環(huán)境行政司法有巨大的需求,但環(huán)境行政司法的實然功能并未發(fā)揮有效化解行政爭議、充分救濟公眾程序性環(huán)境權(quán)利、審判監(jiān)督環(huán)境行政的作用。因此,環(huán)境行政司法機制的完善路徑主要是將錯位的環(huán)境行政司法功能重新歸位以發(fā)揮其應(yīng)然功能,即增強環(huán)境行政司法的解紛功能,防止環(huán)境行政管制權(quán)怠用和濫用,確保公民環(huán)境權(quán)利救濟的有效性。
[Abstract]:Environmental administrative litigation is the main means of environmental administrative judicial participation in environmental governance. By reviewing two typical cases of environmental protection administrative litigation published by the Supreme people's Court, it is concluded that the current environmental administrative judicature is characterized by a single litigation case, a high appeal rate and a high plaintiff losing rate. From the perspective of functionalism, it is found that the real function of environmental administrative justice is to maintain the administration of environmental protection departments according to law, to explain laws and regulations related to environmental protection and to promote the governance of environmental protection public affairs. Although the public has a great demand for environmental administrative justice, the actual function of environmental administrative justice has not played an effective role in resolving administrative disputes, fully relief the procedural environmental rights of the public, and in adjudication and supervision of environmental administration. Therefore, the perfect path of the environmental administrative judicial mechanism is mainly to reposition the misplaced environmental administrative judicial function to give play to its supposed function, that is, to strengthen the environmental administrative justice's function of resolving disputes, and to prevent the environmental administrative control power from being used and abused. To ensure the effectiveness of the relief of citizens' environmental rights.
【作者單位】： 重慶大學(xué)法學(xué)院;重慶大學(xué)西部環(huán)境資源法制建設(shè)研究中心;
【基金】：中央高�；究蒲袠I(yè)務(wù)費重大項目:“公共建筑碳排放權(quán)交易原理與制度研究”(CDJKXB14002) 重慶市研究生科研創(chuàng)新項目:“環(huán)境風(fēng)險視域下鄰避沖突的法律規(guī)制研究”(CYB16051) 中央高�；究蒲袠I(yè)務(wù)費一般項目:“風(fēng)險視閾下環(huán)境群體性事件的法律控制”(106112015CDJSK08JD07)
【分類號】：D925.3
本文編號：2160737
[Abstract]:Environmental administrative litigation is the main means of environmental administrative judicial participation in environmental governance. By reviewing two typical cases of environmental protection administrative litigation published by the Supreme people's Court, it is concluded that the current environmental administrative judicature is characterized by a single litigation case, a high appeal rate and a high plaintiff losing rate. From the perspective of functionalism, it is found that the real function of environmental administrative justice is to maintain the administration of environmental protection departments according to law, to explain laws and regulations related to environmental protection and to promote the governance of environmental protection public affairs. Although the public has a great demand for environmental administrative justice, the actual function of environmental administrative justice has not played an effective role in resolving administrative disputes, fully relief the procedural environmental rights of the public, and in adjudication and supervision of environmental administration. Therefore, the perfect path of the environmental administrative judicial mechanism is mainly to reposition the misplaced environmental administrative judicial function to give play to its supposed function, that is, to strengthen the environmental administrative justice's function of resolving disputes, and to prevent the environmental administrative control power from being used and abused. To ensure the effectiveness of the relief of citizens' environmental rights.
【作者單位】： 重慶大學(xué)法學(xué)院;重慶大學(xué)西部環(huán)境資源法制建設(shè)研究中心;
【基金】：中央高�；究蒲袠I(yè)務(wù)費重大項目:“公共建筑碳排放權(quán)交易原理與制度研究”(CDJKXB14002) 重慶市研究生科研創(chuàng)新項目:“環(huán)境風(fēng)險視域下鄰避沖突的法律規(guī)制研究”(CYB16051) 中央高�；究蒲袠I(yè)務(wù)費一般項目:“風(fēng)險視閾下環(huán)境群體性事件的法律控制”(106112015CDJSK08JD07)
【分類號】：D925.3
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條
1 呂忠梅;;環(huán)境行政司法:問題與對策——以實證分析為視角[J];法律適用;2014年04期
2 ;[J];;年期
，本文編號：2160737
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2160737.html
