【摘要】：黨的十八屆四中全會通過的《中共中央關于全面推進依法治國若干重大問題的決定》提出“推進以審判為中心的訴訟制度改革”的目標,從而正式確立了以審判為中心訴訟制度改革的宏觀政策設計,這既是對刑事司法規(guī)律的科學回歸及刑事司法內(nèi)在要求的有效回應,也是刑事訴訟制度改革和發(fā)展的根本方向。推進刑事訴訟制度改革,是在近年來冤假錯案頻繁“曝光”的背景下,黨中央著力推進的一項重大改革戰(zhàn)略。長期以來,我國在刑事司法領域,事實上形成了“以偵查為中心”的訴訟模式,在“有罪推定”思維和追求破案率等“政績”的驅(qū)使下,案件“帶病”移送、起訴、審判的不在少數(shù),刑事訴訟法學理論界和司法實務界,都渴望并呼吁改革刑事訴訟制度。可以說,推進以審判為中心的訴訟制度改革,是眾望所歸。在刑事訴訟“偵查-起訴-審判”三階段中,檢察機關承擔著審查起訴、出庭指控犯罪、審判監(jiān)督等重要職能,推進刑事訴訟制度改革,對刑事檢察工作影響深遠,既是重大機遇,也有諸多挑戰(zhàn)。筆者在分析刑事訴訟制度改革背景的基礎上,對以審判為中心的基本內(nèi)涵、國內(nèi)外理論研究和司法實踐進行了歸納總結(jié),指出當前刑事檢察工作中存在的“司法理念亟需更新,審前程序中偵、捕、訴關系錯位,司法實踐中的證據(jù)審查模式存在缺陷,庭前會議制度不完善,檢察環(huán)節(jié)刑事訴訟繁簡分流機制不健全,公訴人司法辦案能力不足”等六個方面的主要問題,并進行了深刻剖析。最后,針對存在問題和不足,筆者從刑事檢察工作機制創(chuàng)新的視角,提出檢察機關應對刑事訴訟制度改革的5個方面19項具體措施。這些措施包含:樹立現(xiàn)代刑事司法理念、完善應對庭審實質(zhì)化的工作機制、構(gòu)建以檢察為主導的訴前機制、健全刑事訴訟檢察監(jiān)督機制、正確處理控辯關系等五個方面,涵蓋了刑事訴訟控辯審三角結(jié)構(gòu)中的諸多因素,從理念到實踐進行了全方位的分析解讀,期望能夠為刑事訴訟制度改革提供參考和借鑒,以不斷完善以審判為中心的刑事訴訟制度建設。
[Abstract]:The "decision of the CPC Central Committee on comprehensively promoting the Rule of Law on several important issues" adopted by the fourth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee put forward the goal of "advancing the reform of the litigation system with the trial as the center". Thus, the macro policy design of the judicial system reform is established, which is not only an effective response to the scientific return of the criminal justice law and the inherent requirements of criminal justice, but also the fundamental direction of the reform and development of the criminal procedure system. To promote the reform of criminal procedure system is a major reform strategy put forward by the CPC Central Committee under the background of frequent "exposure" of unjust and false cases in recent years. For a long time, in the field of criminal justice, our country has in fact formed a mode of litigation centered on investigation. Driven by the thinking of "presumption of guilt" and the pursuit of "achievements" such as the rate of detection, the case is transferred and prosecuted. There are not a few trials, criminal procedural law theory and judicial practice, both eager and called for the reform of the criminal procedure system. It can be said that to promote the trial-centered litigation system reform, is expected. In the three stages of criminal procedure, such as examining and prosecuting, appearing in court to charge crimes, supervising trial and so on, the procuratorial organs have profound influence on the criminal procuratorial work by pushing forward the reform of the criminal procedure system. There are many challenges as well as great opportunities. On the basis of analyzing the background of the reform of the criminal procedure system, the author summarizes the basic connotation of the trial as the center, the theoretical research and judicial practice at home and abroad, and points out that the judicial concept in the current criminal procuratorial work needs to be updated urgently. In pretrial procedure, the relationship between investigation, arrest and prosecution is misplaced, there are defects in the mode of evidence examination in judicial practice, the system of pre-trial meeting is not perfect, and the mechanism of diverting complex and simplified criminal proceedings in procuratorial links is not perfect. The main problems in six aspects, such as insufficient judicial handling capacity of public prosecutor, are deeply analyzed. Finally, in view of the existing problems and deficiencies, the author puts forward 19 concrete measures for procuratorial organs to deal with the reform of criminal procedure system in 5 aspects from the angle of innovation of criminal procuratorial work mechanism. These measures include: establishing the modern criminal justice concept, perfecting the working mechanism to deal with the essence of the trial, constructing the pre-prosecution mechanism led by the procuratorate, perfecting the procuratorial supervision mechanism of the criminal procedure, correctly handling the relationship between prosecution and defense, etc. Covering many factors in the triangular structure of prosecution and defense trial in criminal procedure, the author analyzes and interprets from concept to practice, hoping to provide reference and reference for the reform of criminal procedure system. To constantly improve the trial as the center of the criminal procedure system construction.
【學位授予單位】：江蘇大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.2

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 徐樂林;;關于精神文明創(chuàng)建工作機制創(chuàng)新的思考[J];青海氣象;2006年S1期

2 林殿玲;在應對入世挑戰(zhàn)中推進年輕干部工作機制創(chuàng)新[J];發(fā)展論壇;2003年12期

3 李建禮;;基層群眾工作機制創(chuàng)新的探索[J];領導科學論壇(理論);2014年03期

4 殷勇;;黨建工作機制創(chuàng)新談[J];農(nóng)村工作通訊;2009年01期

5 李春芳;王南燕;;談高校黨外人士隊伍建設工作機制創(chuàng)新[J];遼寧師專學報(社會科學版);2014年02期

6 韓寶銀;;貴州師范學院共青團工作機制創(chuàng)新研究[J];貴州師范學院學報;2012年01期

7 李剛;沈曉陽;;社會學視野下的高校黨建工作機制創(chuàng)新研究[J];淮海工學院學報(人文社會科學版);2012年07期

8 黎慈;;社會轉(zhuǎn)型期公安群眾工作機制創(chuàng)新問題研究[J];公安研究;2012年08期

9 張曉燕;黨代表最廣大人民根本利益的工作機制創(chuàng)新的思考[J];領導之友;2002年03期

10 宋堅剛;;黨內(nèi)基層民主工作機制創(chuàng)新研究——基于浙江黨內(nèi)基層民主演進的視角[J];觀察與思考;2013年11期

相關重要報紙文章 前10條

1 記者 李鵬飛 通訊員 田羊;積極推進人大工作機制創(chuàng)新[N];三峽日報;2014年

2 中國航油華北公司 蔣志東;淺談新時期青年工作機制創(chuàng)新[N];中國民航報;2013年

3 記者 張輝 通訊員 榮秋瑾;政協(xié)工作機制創(chuàng)新要著眼于實踐[N];湖北日報;2014年

4 劉萬青 河北省廊坊市委常委、市紀委書記;創(chuàng)新的方法論視角[N];中國紀檢監(jiān)察報;2009年

5 薛新生;努力推進人才工作機制創(chuàng)新[N];人民日報;2004年

6 本報記者 楊劍輝;提案工作機制創(chuàng)新走在全省前列[N];惠州日報;2012年

7 駐鐵嶺縣記者/李夢楠;以信息化推動公安工作機制創(chuàng)新[N];鐵嶺日報;2009年

8 張德智;自治區(qū)政協(xié)港澳臺僑聯(lián)絡委員會召開課題研討會[N];華興時報;2007年

9 谷鳳艷;簡談輔導員工作機制創(chuàng)新[N];光明日報;2007年

10 王慶;深入探討培訓工作機制創(chuàng)新[N];中國建設報;2008年

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 朱孟超;以審判為中心背景下的刑事檢察工作機制創(chuàng)新研究[D];江蘇大學;2017年

，

本文編號：2160615