發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-26 13:41

【摘要】：環(huán)境問(wèn)題日益嚴(yán)重,在行政機(jī)關(guān)的不當(dāng)行政行為下可導(dǎo)致環(huán)境污染的產(chǎn)生和加劇,需要更為完善的法律進(jìn)行預(yù)防監(jiān)督。隨著我國(guó)的法治進(jìn)步、立法水準(zhǔn)的不斷提高以及司法實(shí)踐的需要,構(gòu)建環(huán)境行政公益訴訟制度成為了迫切需要。2015年最高人民檢察院在部分地區(qū)展開(kāi)公益訴訟試點(diǎn)工作。此項(xiàng)工作為構(gòu)建該制度打下了一定基礎(chǔ)。因此,本文認(rèn)為在實(shí)踐方面不斷推進(jìn)的同時(shí),也應(yīng)該推進(jìn)對(duì)該訴訟制度的理論研究。本文分析了建立該訴訟制度的理論基礎(chǔ)、立法狀況以及司法狀況。重點(diǎn)對(duì)我國(guó)的《憲法》、《環(huán)境保護(hù)法》、《行政訴訟法》作了分析和總結(jié)。由此可以看出,我國(guó)構(gòu)建環(huán)境行政公益訴訟制度在立法方面存在的障礙和局限性:理論基礎(chǔ)的缺乏、法律規(guī)定的不確定性、原告資格受案范圍的狹窄等。另一方面,對(duì)該制度在理論和實(shí)踐方面不斷深入探究、公民意識(shí)不斷增強(qiáng)的狀況下,對(duì)該訴訟制度的構(gòu)建具有一定推動(dòng)作用。本文對(duì)國(guó)外已經(jīng)構(gòu)建的環(huán)境行政公益訴訟制度做了對(duì)比分析。在這些國(guó)家中,該訴訟制度的建立比較早,該制度在不斷地發(fā)展變化和完善,對(duì)于環(huán)境保護(hù)的力度逐漸增強(qiáng),訴訟限制性條件整體上呈現(xiàn)減少的趨勢(shì),同時(shí)還制定了相關(guān)的配套程序。在此對(duì)比研究基礎(chǔ)之上,筆者提出了構(gòu)建設(shè)想。包括:賦予不同主體原告資格;明確界定了環(huán)境行政公益訴訟的受案范圍;設(shè)置訴前程序防止濫訴;舉證責(zé)任在該種訴訟下的重新劃分;對(duì)不同的訴訟主體所應(yīng)承擔(dān)的訴訟費(fèi)用的構(gòu)想。
[Abstract]:Environmental problems are becoming more and more serious, which can lead to environmental pollution under the improper administrative behavior of administrative organs, and need more perfect laws to prevent and supervise. With the progress of our country's rule of law, the constant improvement of legislative level and the need of judicial practice, it is urgent to construct the environmental administrative public interest litigation system. In 2015, the Supreme people's Procuratorate launched the pilot work of public interest litigation in some areas. This work has laid a certain foundation for the construction of the system. Therefore, this paper holds that the theoretical study of the litigation system should be promoted while the practice is constantly advancing. This paper analyzes the theoretical basis, legislative status and judicial status of establishing the litigation system. The constitution, environmental protection law and administrative procedure law of our country are analyzed and summarized. From this, we can see that there are some obstacles and limitations in establishing the environmental administrative public interest litigation system in our country, such as the lack of theoretical basis, the uncertainty of legal provisions, the narrow scope of the plaintiff's qualification to receive cases, and so on. On the other hand, it has a certain role to promote the construction of the litigation system under the condition that the system has been deeply explored in theory and practice, and the citizen consciousness has been strengthened constantly. This paper makes a comparative analysis of the environmental administrative public interest litigation system that has been constructed abroad. In these countries, the litigation system was established relatively early, the system is constantly developing, changing and improving, the intensity of environmental protection is gradually increasing, and the restrictive conditions of litigation have shown a trend of decreasing as a whole. At the same time, the relevant supporting procedures are also developed. On the basis of this comparative study, the author puts forward a tentative plan of construction. Including: to give different subjects plaintiff qualifications; clearly defined the scope of environmental administrative public interest litigation; set up a pre-action procedure to prevent excessive litigation; the burden of proof in this kind of litigation under the re-division of the burden of proof; The conception of litigation cost that should be borne by different litigant.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：新疆大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 裘t，

本文編號(hào)：2146192