【摘要】：民事調(diào)解制度在我國(guó)民事訴訟法中占有重要地位,對(duì)我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展和社會(huì)和諧穩(wěn)定發(fā)揮了重要作用。但近年來(lái),因立法缺位,司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)虛假調(diào)解缺乏識(shí)別標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和制裁手段,致虛假調(diào)解有泛濫之勢(shì),嚴(yán)重?fù)p害了案外人利益和司法權(quán)威。因此,研究民事訴訟中的虛假調(diào)解具有重要意義。 本文分為三個(gè)部分： 第一部分通過(guò)典型案例,細(xì)致分析了民事訴訟中虛假調(diào)解的三個(gè)特征：主觀故意性、目的隱蔽性和行為違法性等,繼而提出民事訴訟中虛假調(diào)解是指民事訴訟當(dāng)事人之間“事前”溝通,利用法律賦予的訴訟權(quán)利,虛構(gòu)相關(guān)事實(shí)和證據(jù),通過(guò)法院調(diào)解程序,侵害案外第三人或國(guó)家、社會(huì)利益的違法行為,并對(duì)虛假調(diào)解與訴訟欺詐、惡意訴訟等相關(guān)概念進(jìn)行了辨析。 第二部分從實(shí)體法和程序法的立法缺陷入手,闡述了民事訴訟中虛假調(diào)解產(chǎn)生的原因；從當(dāng)事人規(guī)避法律、法院識(shí)別能力偏低以及檢察監(jiān)督滯后三方面分析了實(shí)踐中導(dǎo)致虛假調(diào)解產(chǎn)生的原因。 第三部分提出防范民事訴訟中的虛假調(diào)解應(yīng)當(dāng)遵循司法克制與司法能動(dòng)平衡、訴權(quán)保護(hù)與防范濫訴平衡、實(shí)體法與程序法并重三原則,對(duì)完善民事調(diào)解制度、構(gòu)建民事虛假訴訟侵權(quán)責(zé)任提出了具體建議,并對(duì)司法適用中的相關(guān)問(wèn)題提出了自己的意見(jiàn)。
[Abstract]:Civil mediation system plays an important role in China's civil procedure law and plays an important role in economic development and social harmony and stability. However, in recent years, due to the absence of legislation, the lack of identification standards and sanctions for false mediation in judicial practice has led to the proliferation of false mediation, which has seriously damaged the interests of outsiders and judicial authority. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the false mediation in civil action. This paper is divided into three parts: the first part, through typical cases, analyzes the three characteristics of false mediation in civil litigation: subjective intention, purpose concealment and illegal behavior, etc. Then it is put forward that false mediation in civil action refers to "prior communication" between the parties in civil action, making use of the litigation rights conferred by law, making up relevant facts and evidence, and infringing the third party or country outside the case through court mediation procedure. The illegal acts of social interests, and the false mediation and litigation fraud, malicious litigation and other related concepts are analyzed. The second part begins with the legislative defects of substantive law and procedural law, expounds the causes of false mediation in civil litigation, and evades the law from the parties. This paper analyzes the causes of false mediation in practice from three aspects: the low ability of court identification and the lag of procuratorial supervision. In the third part, the author points out that to prevent false mediation in civil action, the balance between judicial restraint and judicial action should be followed, the balance between the protection of litigation right and the prevention of excessive action should be followed, the substantive law and procedural law should pay equal attention to the three principles, and the system of civil mediation should be perfected. The author puts forward concrete suggestions on the construction of tort liability in civil false litigation, and puts forward his own opinions on the relevant problems in judicial application.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

中國(guó)期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù) 前10條

1 劉艷芳;;我國(guó)古代調(diào)解制度解析[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期

2 徐愛(ài)國(guó);;英美法中“濫用法律訴訟”的侵權(quán)責(zé)任[J];法學(xué)家;2000年02期

3 李浩;;虛假訴訟中惡意調(diào)解問(wèn)題研究[J];江海學(xué)刊;2012年01期

4 李載謙;;論民事訴訟中惡意調(diào)解的識(shí)別與防范[J];南京政治學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年03期

5 尉蘭琴;;試論虛假訴訟[J];隴東學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

6 范衛(wèi)國(guó);;如何監(jiān)督制約民事訴訟中的虛假調(diào)解行為——以一起虛假借貸糾紛為例[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2013年06期

7 項(xiàng)延永;;虛假民事訴訟之防范[J];人民司法;2010年11期

8 王福華;;民事訴訟協(xié)同主義:在理想和現(xiàn)實(shí)之間[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2006年06期

9 于海生;;訴訟欺詐的侵權(quán)責(zé)任[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2008年05期

10 畢慧;;論民事虛假訴訟的法律規(guī)制[J];浙江學(xué)刊;2010年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：2139062