【摘要】：摘要：2002年開始,最高人民法院逐漸調(diào)整之前的司法改革思路,2005年提出了“能調(diào)則調(diào),當(dāng)判則判,調(diào)判結(jié)合,案結(jié)事了”的十六字方針,2009年更是提出了“調(diào)解優(yōu)先,調(diào)判結(jié)合”的八字方針,2012年新的民事訴訟法修改意見稿通過,其中提出了先行調(diào)解的概念,一時(shí)間訴訟調(diào)解成了法院解決訴訟糾紛的主要方式,但是也應(yīng)當(dāng)注意到無論是調(diào)解優(yōu)先還是先行調(diào)解在現(xiàn)實(shí)運(yùn)用過程中還有一定的困惑,應(yīng)當(dāng)理清訴訟中調(diào)判的關(guān)系,這樣才能真正達(dá)到法律效果與社會(huì)效果并存的案結(jié)事了。 對(duì)于訴訟調(diào)解優(yōu)先和先行調(diào)解在現(xiàn)實(shí)中的困惑,提出調(diào)判不僅要結(jié)合,調(diào)判更要分離,實(shí)行調(diào)判分離和調(diào)判結(jié)合的相互合作,以解決現(xiàn)行的調(diào)判合一所帶來的司法實(shí)踐弊端,實(shí)現(xiàn)訴訟調(diào)解在解決訴訟糾紛的重要價(jià)值,使訴訟調(diào)解在司法實(shí)踐中發(fā)揮更大的作用。強(qiáng)調(diào)訴訟調(diào)解的重要作用的同時(shí),法院不能一味地奉行調(diào)解優(yōu)先調(diào)解至上,應(yīng)當(dāng)正確理解最高人民法院所提出的調(diào)解優(yōu)先司法政策和新民訴法所規(guī)定的先行調(diào)解條文,調(diào)判既要結(jié)合也要分離,調(diào)判既要分工也要合作。只有充分認(rèn)清訴訟中調(diào)判的關(guān)系,才能更好的發(fā)揮訴訟調(diào)解的作用,才能更好的執(zhí)行最高人民法院調(diào)解優(yōu)先的司法政策,才能更好的適用新民訴中先行調(diào)解的法律條文。
[Abstract]:Abstract: since 2002, the Supreme people's Court has gradually adjusted the idea of judicial reform before, in 2005, it put forward the 16-character policy of "can adjust, when the sentence is decided, when the sentence is combined, and the case is concluded", and in 2009, it put forward the "mediation priority." According to the eight-character policy, the revised draft of the new Civil procedure Law in 2012 has put forward the concept of first mediation, which has become the main way for the court to resolve litigation disputes in a short period of time. But we should also pay attention to whether mediation priority or mediation in the practical application process there is some confusion, we should clear up the relationship between litigation and adjudication, so as to truly achieve the legal effect and social effect of the case closure. With regard to the confusion between the priority of litigation mediation and the first mediation in reality, it is proposed that the mediation and judgment should not only be combined, but also separated, and the mutual cooperation of the separation of mediation and judgment should be carried out in order to solve the problems in judicial practice brought about by the integration of mediation and judgment. Realizing the important value of litigation mediation in resolving litigation disputes and making litigation mediation play a greater role in judicial practice. While emphasizing the important role of mediation in litigation, the court should not blindly pursue mediation first, and should correctly understand the mediation priority judicial policy put forward by the Supreme people's Court and the provisions of the New Civil procedure Law on the first mediation, The mediation and judgment should be combined and separated, and the division of labor and cooperation should be done. Only when we fully recognize the relationship between mediation and judgment in litigation can we better play the role of litigation mediation, better implement the judicial policy of the Supreme people's Court in mediation priority, and better apply the legal provisions of mediation in the new people's lawsuit.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.14

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 潘劍鋒;劉哲瑋;;論法院調(diào)解與糾紛解決之關(guān)系——從構(gòu)建和諧社會(huì)的角度展開[J];比較法研究;2010年04期

2 唐東楚;何文燕;;論法院委托調(diào)解[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年05期

3 李浩;;法院協(xié)助調(diào)解機(jī)制研究[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2009年04期

4 李喜蓮;;法院調(diào)解優(yōu)先的冷思考[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2010年02期

5 劉加良;;民事訴訟調(diào)解社會(huì)化的根據(jù)、原則與限度[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2011年03期

6 肖建華;唐玉富;;論法院調(diào)解保密原則[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2011年04期

7 梁平;;“大調(diào)解”銜接機(jī)制的理論建構(gòu)與實(shí)證探究[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2011年05期

8 周宗良;;論訴訟調(diào)解在審判權(quán)運(yùn)行中的角色定位[J];福建法學(xué);2011年01期

9 孫海龍;高偉;;調(diào)解的價(jià)值是如何實(shí)現(xiàn)的 以部分中、基層人民法院為研究樣本[J];法律適用;2009年10期

10 毛淑玲;;法院調(diào)解與法院附設(shè)調(diào)解[J];法學(xué)雜志;2008年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：2139082