【摘要】：律師的會見權(quán),作為辯護律師固有的一項權(quán)利,受到法律的明確保護和律師們的積極維護。對于賄賂案件,犯罪嫌疑人是否能及時會見到辯護律師對于嫌疑人權(quán)益的保障尤為重要。由于缺乏證明犯罪的直接證據(jù),檢察機關通過對犯罪嫌疑人羈押審訊來尋找案件的突破口,這時嫌疑人往往因辯護能力不足而處于弱勢地位。只有當律師接受委托后,在偵查階段提前介入,并充分行使辯護權(quán),才能打破賄賂案件相對封閉的偵辦模式。律師在偵查階段會見嫌疑人,對維持控辯平等的司法秩序,促進司法的公正和權(quán)威,保護被追訴人的合法權(quán)益有著積極的作用。但現(xiàn)實情況卻并不樂觀,賄賂案件律師在偵查階段行使會見權(quán)經(jīng)常會一波三折。搞清楚律師會見難現(xiàn)象背后的深層次原因,有針對性地提出改進措施,對于規(guī)范律師會見制度,實現(xiàn)控辯雙方良性互動,依法指控犯罪,更好地保障犯罪嫌疑人合法權(quán)益、推動刑事辯護制度發(fā)展進步具有重要的現(xiàn)實意義。本論文除引言和結(jié)語外共分為四個部分,主要內(nèi)容如下:第一部分,指出賄賂案件律師的會見權(quán)在新刑訴法頒布實施后的一系列新變化。為改善一直以來律師“會見難”的現(xiàn)狀,2012年《刑事訴訟法》在《律師法》的基礎上對律師會見權(quán)的保障增添了不少新的法律規(guī)范。與1996年《刑事訴訟法》相比,律師的會見權(quán)有了進一步的擴大。犯罪嫌疑人可以在偵查階段委托辯護律師,律師的會見程序也更加便捷,取消了偵查機關可以派人在場的規(guī)定。同時,新刑訴法第47條對于侵犯律師會見權(quán)的問題也開辟了一條新的救濟途徑。第二部分,對律師在偵查階段會見賄賂案件嫌疑人時遇到的主要障礙進行歸納梳理。雖經(jīng)《律師法》、《刑事訴訟法》的修改,大多數(shù)刑事案件律師的會見權(quán)取得了較為明顯的效果,但對于賄賂案件律師會見難的問題依然不容樂觀。主要存在檢察機關將普通賄賂案件界定為特別重大賄賂案件來限制律師會見,有關部門無故拖延安排律師會見或在律師會見時提特殊要求,律師權(quán)利被侵犯卻得不到有效救濟等問題。徒法不足以自行,賄賂案件律師會見難的現(xiàn)狀還存在著司法實踐中方方面面的阻礙。第三部分,分析律師會見難背后的深層次原因。律師會見難主要有四個方面的原因,就相關法律規(guī)范而言,司法解釋對特別重大賄賂案件的范圍認定和刑訴法對律師會見的一些程序性規(guī)定還存在缺陷。同時,檢察機關也有執(zhí)法觀念轉(zhuǎn)變不及時、偵查模式轉(zhuǎn)型不及時、執(zhí)法辦案考評體系不合理等問題,檢察機關在部門利益的驅(qū)使下,難免對會見進行不當阻礙。就律師自身而言,一些律師在金錢、利益的誘惑下不惜鋌而走險,違反職業(yè)道德和執(zhí)業(yè)紀律不正當會見犯罪嫌疑人等,也使人們對律師行業(yè)產(chǎn)生了偏見。除此之外,一系列刑事政策等客觀方面的因素也對賄賂案件律師的會見權(quán)產(chǎn)生一定的消極影響。第四部分,提出保障律師會見權(quán)的意見建議。如何對律師會見權(quán)進行全面的保障,首先要完善相關法律規(guī)范;其次,檢察機關必須及時轉(zhuǎn)變執(zhí)法觀念、推動偵查模式轉(zhuǎn)型發(fā)展,提高偵查水平和能力,建立完善的偵查權(quán)制約機制和律師會見監(jiān)督機制。同時,辦案人員與律師要提高自身素質(zhì),增強互信與合作;最后,打擊賄賂犯罪與堅持寬嚴相濟的刑事政策必須兩手抓,不能顧此失彼。保障律師會見權(quán)也是保障人權(quán),都是維護司法公正,構(gòu)建法治社會的必然要求和題中之意。
[Abstract]:The right to meet the lawyer, as an inherent right of the defense lawyer, is clearly protected by the law and actively maintained by the lawyers. For a bribe case, it is particularly important for the suspect to see the defense lawyer in time to safeguard the rights and interests of the suspect. The procuratorial organ has passed the criminal suspicion because of the lack of direct evidence of the crime of proof. Suspect detention trial to find the breach of the case, at this time the suspect is often in a weak position because of insufficient defense ability. Only when the lawyer accepts the entrustment, it can break the relative closed detection mode of the bribery case by intervening in the investigation stage and fully exercising the right of defense. The lawyer meets the suspect in the stage of investigation and maintains the accusation. The equal judicial order, promote the justice and authority of the judiciary and protect the legitimate rights and interests of the accused has a positive role. But the reality is not optimistic. The right to meet the right of meeting the lawyer in the investigation stage is often broken down. It is of great practical significance to standardize the lawyer's meeting system, realize the benign interaction between the prosecution and the defense, charge the crime in accordance with the law, guarantee the legitimate rights and interests of the criminal suspects and promote the development and progress of the criminal defense system. This paper is divided into four parts except the introduction and the conclusion. The main contents are as follows: the first part, points out the lawyer of bribery case. The right of meeting is a series of new changes after the promulgation and implementation of the new criminal law. In order to improve the present situation of the lawyer's "meeting difficult", in 2012, the law of criminal procedure added a number of new legal norms to the protection of the right to meet the lawyer on the basis of the law of the lawyer. Compared with the criminal procedure law in 1996, the right to meet the lawyer has been further expanded. The criminal suspect can entrust the defense lawyer at the stage of investigation, the lawyer's meeting procedure is also more convenient, and the provisions of the investigation organ can be cancelled. At the same time, the forty-seventh new criminal procedure law has opened up a new way of relief for the right to meet the lawyer's right of meeting. The second part, the lawyer meets the bribery case in the investigation stage. The main obstacles encountered in the case of the suspect are summed up. Although the amendment of the law of the lawyers and the amendment of the criminal procedure law, the right to meet the lawyers in most criminal cases has been more obvious, but it is still not optimistic about the difficulty of meeting lawyers in bribery cases. The main existence of the inspection authorities is to define the common bribery cases as particularly heavy. The case of big bribe to restrict the lawyer's meeting, the relevant department procrastinating the lawyer's meeting or asking for special request when the lawyer meets, the lawyer's rights are violated but not effective relief. The apprentice law is not sufficient. The difficult situation of meeting the lawyer in bribery case still exists in the judicial practice of the Chinese side. Analysis of the third part, There are four main reasons behind the difficulty of the lawyer's meeting. There are mainly reasons for the difficulty of the lawyer's meeting. In terms of the relevant legal norms, the scope of the judicial interpretation on the scope of the special major bribery cases and the procedural provisions on the meeting of the lawyers are still defective. At the same time, the procuratorial organs have not changed the idea of law enforcement in time, and the investigation model is not timely. When the type of transformation is not in time, the system of examination and evaluation of the law enforcement is unreasonable, the procuratorial organs are unavoidable to obstruct the meeting under the drive of the interests of the Department. As for the lawyers themselves, some lawyers are tempted under the temptation of money and interests, violating the professional ethics and the unjustified meeting of the criminal suspects and so on. In addition to this, the objective factors such as a series of criminal policies also have a certain negative influence on the right to meet the lawyer's right to meet the lawyer. In the fourth part, the opinions and suggestions are put forward to guarantee the right to meet the lawyer's meeting right. The organ must change the concept of law enforcement in time, promote the transformation and development of investigation mode, improve the level and ability of investigation, establish a perfect restriction mechanism of investigation right and lawyer meeting supervision mechanism. At the same time, the case handling personnel and lawyers should improve their own quality and enhance mutual trust and cooperation. Finally, the criminal policy of combating bribery crime and insisting on leniency is necessary. To protect the right of lawyers to meet is also a guarantee of human rights, which is the inevitable requirement and the meaning of maintaining judicial justice and building a society ruled by law.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D925.2

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 趙永林;論律師會見權(quán)[J];中國司法;2002年11期

2 趙永林;律師會見權(quán)若干問題研究[J];法學雜志;2003年05期

3 張學龍;盧希芬;;律師會見權(quán)與“交往理性”[J];西南民族大學學報(人文社科版);2007年05期

4 高文平;;淺談我國律師會見權(quán)的實現(xiàn)與完善[J];山西財經(jīng)大學學報;2008年S1期

5 林歡歡;;對新《律師法》關于律師會見權(quán)規(guī)定的解讀與思考[J];法制與社會;2008年20期

6 何備戰(zhàn);張奮鵬;;反貪偵查工作如何應對律師會見權(quán)的擴張[J];中國檢察官;2008年07期

7 孫琳;;比較法視野中的律師會見權(quán)[J];西南民族大學學報(人文社科版);2009年11期

8 利曉雯;;律師會見權(quán)探討——尋找保障與合理限制的協(xié)調(diào)[J];法制與社會;2010年16期

9 胡磊;;完善機制 保障律師會見權(quán)[J];人大建設;2011年06期

10 陳學權(quán);;偵查期間合理限制律師會見權(quán)研究[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2011年05期

相關會議論文 前2條

1 張濤;;探析律師會見權(quán)行使和風險[A];當代法學論壇（2011年第4輯）[C];2011年

2 金學軍;代金山;;律師會見權(quán)擴大對賄賂犯罪偵查的影響及對策[A];第八屆國家高級檢察官論壇論文集：偵查程序的修改與檢察工作應對[C];2012年

相關重要報紙文章 前10條

1 岳啟杰;律師會見權(quán)之我見[N];法制日報;2013年

2 傅達林;律師會見權(quán)必須從司法救濟突破[N];法制日報;2008年

3 王威;措施不細化律師會見權(quán)難落實[N];檢察日報;2008年

4 浙江省紹興市人民檢察院 過孟超 彭新華;落實律師會見權(quán)還有提升空間[N];檢察日報;2013年

5 楊濤;以公民的名義呼吁救濟律師會見權(quán)[N];中國保險報;2007年

6 劉百軍;首例律師會見權(quán)案被駁回[N];法制日報;2008年

7 本報法律顧問團成員單位、同望律師事務所律師 梁勇軍;落實人權(quán)行動計劃依法維護律師會見權(quán)[N];法治快報;2009年

8 周崇華;律師會見權(quán)豈能如此限制[N];法制日報;2005年

9 記者 陳健;維護在押嫌犯合法權(quán)益,川保障律師會見權(quán)[N];新華每日電訊;2009年

10 ;保障律師會見權(quán)不是與公安機關作對[N];深圳商報;2003年

相關碩士學位論文 前10條

1 石飛鵬;論律師會見權(quán)[D];海南大學;2010年

2 鄭士軍;論律師會見權(quán)[D];湖南師范大學;2012年

3 劉輝;刑事訴訟律師會見權(quán)研究[D];山東大學;2013年

4 彭婷;論辯護律師會見權(quán)[D];云南大學;2015年

5 趙佳;律師會見權(quán)問題的法律思考[D];山東大學;2010年

6 趙占利;律師會見權(quán)擴張與職務犯罪偵查[D];中國社會科學院研究生院;2013年

7 徐龍崇;偵查階段律師會見權(quán)研究[D];天津商業(yè)大學;2014年

8 李思睿;偵查階段律師會見權(quán)研究[D];沈陽師范大學;2011年

9 劉晟;偵查階段律師會見權(quán)研究[D];西南財經(jīng)大學;2013年

10 蔣寅軍;偵查階段律師會見權(quán)問題研究[D];西南政法大學;2011年

，

本文編號：2138697