本文選題：多元化行政爭議解決機制 + 現(xiàn)行制度　； 參考：《河北大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：行政爭議解決機制，是指由行政主體設立或主持的非訴訟爭議解決機制，包括行政調(diào)解、行政裁決、行政申訴等基本形式。行政爭議解決機制的作用和發(fā)展反映了當代社會治理的需求，已逐步成為服務型政府為社會公眾提供的一種公共服務資源。行政爭議解決機制為當事人提供了一條區(qū)別于司法訴訟的公力救濟途徑，可以兼容協(xié)商性和裁決性程序，它將行政權(quán)力的能動性、直接性和高效性與協(xié)商性、衡平性和專門性結(jié)合起來，同時具有民間性ADR所不具備的專家優(yōu)勢和權(quán)力資源，容易取得當事人的信任。在特定爭議的處理中，發(fā)揮著舉足重輕的作用。如何將與行政救濟制度相關(guān)聯(lián)的構(gòu)成要素通過科學的方式予以規(guī)范，使其形成一套運行有序、相互銜接、保障有力的多元化行政爭議解決機制，從而保證行政爭議公正、高效地得到解決，是本文研究的主要問題。文章首先闡述了多元化行政爭議解決機制的基本理論，分析了爭議、爭議解決機制、行政爭議解決機制的概念、構(gòu)成要素、類型、功能、發(fā)展趨勢等內(nèi)容從而引出多元化行政爭議解決機制的概念；其次對我國多元化行政爭議解決機制的現(xiàn)狀進行了分析，其中包括我國現(xiàn)行行政爭議解決機制的基本形式與適用范圍、功能與特點以及我國現(xiàn)行行政爭議解決機制的主要特征和存在的主要問題；第三部分對域外行政爭議解決機制進行比較研究，，簡單介紹了英國、法國、日本等國家的代表制度并從中得到完善我國現(xiàn)行行政爭議制度的一些啟示；最后，從構(gòu)建多元化行政爭議解決機制、構(gòu)建標準化行政爭議解決機制、貫徹司法最終原則、重視非訴訟行政爭議解決機制、努力把行政爭議解決在行政程序內(nèi)、改革和完善信訪制度等六個方面闡述了完善我國多元化行政爭議解決機制的基本構(gòu)想。
[Abstract]:The administrative dispute settlement mechanism refers to the non-litigation dispute settlement mechanism established or presided over by the administrative subject, including administrative mediation, administrative adjudication, administrative appeal and other basic forms. The function and development of administrative dispute settlement mechanism reflect the needs of contemporary social governance and have gradually become a kind of public service resources provided by service-oriented government to the public. The administrative dispute settlement mechanism provides the parties with a way of public relief, which is different from the judicial proceedings and can be compatible with the consultative and adjudicative procedures. It brings about the initiative, directness, efficiency and negotiation of the administrative power. It is easy to gain the trust of the litigants because of the combination of balance and specialization, and at the same time, it has the advantage of experts and the resources of power which the folk ADR does not have. In the handling of specific disputes, it plays an important role. How to standardize the elements associated with the administrative relief system in a scientific way, so as to form a set of orderly operation, link up with each other, ensure a pluralistic mechanism of administrative dispute resolution, and thus ensure the fairness of administrative dispute. To be solved efficiently is the main problem studied in this paper. At first, the paper expounds the basic theory of the pluralistic administrative dispute settlement mechanism, and analyzes the concepts, elements, types and functions of the dispute resolution mechanism, the dispute settlement mechanism and the administrative dispute settlement mechanism. The development trend leads to the concept of pluralistic administrative dispute resolution mechanism. Secondly, it analyzes the present situation of the pluralistic administrative dispute settlement mechanism in China. It includes the basic form and scope of application, functions and characteristics of the current administrative dispute settlement mechanism, as well as the main characteristics and main problems of the current administrative dispute settlement mechanism in China. The third part carries on the comparative research to the extraterritorial administrative dispute settlement mechanism, briefly introduces the representative system of the United Kingdom, France, Japan and other countries and gets some enlightenment of perfecting the current administrative dispute system of our country. In order to solve administrative disputes, we should build a diversified administrative dispute settlement mechanism, construct a standardized administrative dispute settlement mechanism, implement the ultimate judicial principle, attach importance to the non-litigation administrative dispute settlement mechanism, and strive to resolve the administrative dispute in the administrative procedure. Six aspects, such as reforming and perfecting the system of letters and visits, expatiate on the basic conception of perfecting the pluralistic administrative dispute settlement mechanism in our country.
【學位授予單位】：河北大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.3;D922.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王亞明;杜萬松;;糾紛解決機制的權(quán)威生成要素探析[J];大慶師范學院學報;2007年03期

2 余保才;;淺談域外行政訴訟調(diào)解制度之啟示——兼論建立我國行政訴訟調(diào)解制度之必要[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(上半月);2007年11期

3 王錫鋅;規(guī)則、合意與治理——行政過程中ADR適用的可能性與妥當性研究[J];法商研究;2003年05期

4 顏滔;徐毅飛;黃捷;;多元化糾紛解決理念視野下的行政糾紛解決方式研究[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2014年01期

5 宋華琳;英國的行政裁判所制度[J];華東政法學院學報;2004年05期

6 王建學;;從行政調(diào)解專員到基本權(quán)利保護專員——法國行政調(diào)解專員制度改革述評[J];國家行政學院學報;2008年05期

7 楊靜;英國行政裁判所制度對完善我國行政復議制度的啟示[J];成都理工大學學報(社會科學版);2003年04期

8 張萍;;公共政策與國際商事仲裁裁決的承認和執(zhí)行[J];河南省政法管理干部學院學報;2007年03期

9 文正邦;陸偉明;;行政訴訟與行政司法制度關(guān)系探析[J];西南政法大學學報;2003年01期

10 崔衛(wèi)平;社會矛盾與“國泰民安”[J];中國新聞周刊;2004年39期

本文編號：2087460