本文選題：鄉(xiāng)村糾紛 + 非訴訟��； 參考：《山東師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：20世紀(jì)八十年代開(kāi)始,我國(guó)逐漸走上了現(xiàn)代意義的法治之路。1999年“依法治國(guó)”被寫(xiě)入憲法,由此開(kāi)啟了法治中國(guó)建設(shè)的新征程。2014年,中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨第十八屆中央委員會(huì)第四次全體會(huì)議審議通過(guò)了《中共中央關(guān)于全面推進(jìn)依法治國(guó)若干重大問(wèn)題的決定》,將我國(guó)法治建設(shè)引向縱深。與此同時(shí),涌入各級(jí)人民法院的訴訟案件數(shù)量迅猛增加,基層人民法院更是人滿為患,這不僅反映了糾紛的訴訟解決機(jī)制逐漸為廣大鄉(xiāng)村村民所接受,也折射出各種糾紛的非訴訟解決機(jī)制功能不斷弱化。近幾年,我國(guó)的司法政策越來(lái)越重視多元化糾紛解決機(jī)制在化解社會(huì)矛盾、調(diào)整社會(huì)關(guān)系、重塑社會(huì)肌體中的重要作用,黨的十八屆四中全會(huì)也明確提出“健全社會(huì)矛盾糾紛預(yù)防化解機(jī)制,完善調(diào)解、仲裁、行政裁決、行政復(fù)議、訴訟等有機(jī)銜接、相互協(xié)調(diào)的多元化糾紛解決機(jī)制”。如今,學(xué)術(shù)界基本達(dá)成了一點(diǎn)共識(shí),即建立一種能夠滿足社會(huì)主體多種需求的多元化糾紛解決機(jī)制是我國(guó)法治建設(shè)未來(lái)的發(fā)展方向。筆者認(rèn)真分析了《廈門(mén)經(jīng)濟(jì)特區(qū)多元化糾紛解決機(jī)制促進(jìn)條例》制定、出臺(tái)背景及其過(guò)程中遇到的問(wèn)題,詳細(xì)闡述了我國(guó)當(dāng)下鄉(xiāng)村社會(huì)中矛盾糾紛的類型和產(chǎn)生原因,根據(jù)糾紛解決的現(xiàn)狀指出了我國(guó)現(xiàn)行糾紛解決機(jī)制存在的不足之處,在此基礎(chǔ)上提出了完善建議和需要解決的問(wèn)題。首先,導(dǎo)論,本章介紹了文章研究的背景、目的和意義,并詳細(xì)闡述了國(guó)內(nèi)外對(duì)于多元化糾紛解決機(jī)制的研究。在此基礎(chǔ)上,提出了本次課題研究的方法、路徑和整體思路。第一章,我國(guó)鄉(xiāng)村涉法涉訴糾紛的概況,本章重點(diǎn)描述了當(dāng)前我國(guó)鄉(xiāng)村社會(huì)中存在的各種涉法涉訴糾紛,具體介紹了糾紛的類型、特點(diǎn)和產(chǎn)生原因,之后詳細(xì)分析了影響村民選擇糾紛解決方式的因素。第二章,我國(guó)現(xiàn)行鄉(xiāng)村涉法涉訴糾紛的解決機(jī)制及其不足,本章從我國(guó)現(xiàn)行的鄉(xiāng)村涉法涉訴糾紛解決機(jī)制入手,分析了不同的糾紛解決機(jī)制在化解糾紛方面的不足,這為多元化糾紛解決機(jī)制在鄉(xiāng)村社會(huì)構(gòu)建的必要性與合理性提供了現(xiàn)實(shí)依據(jù)。第三章,鄉(xiāng)村涉法涉訴糾紛多元化解決機(jī)制的構(gòu)建,本章介紹了多元化糾紛解決機(jī)制的含義、理想模式和現(xiàn)實(shí)中需要處理的幾個(gè)關(guān)系,指出了構(gòu)建理念、策略,最后與鄉(xiāng)村現(xiàn)實(shí)對(duì)接,提出了對(duì)多元化糾紛解決機(jī)制的法律規(guī)制和現(xiàn)實(shí)保障措施。
[Abstract]:Since 80s twentieth Century, China has gradually embarked on the road of rule of law in the modern sense,.1999 "rule of law" was written into the constitution, which opened a new journey of the construction of the rule of law in China for.2014 years. The eighteenth Central Committee of the Communist Party of China considered and passed the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on the comprehensive promotion of the rule of law. At the same time, the number of lawsuits in the people's courts at all levels has increased rapidly, and the grass-roots people's courts are more crowded, which not only reflects the gradual acceptance of the dispute settlement mechanism for the rural villagers, but also reflects the non litigation settlement mechanism of various disputes. In recent years, the judicial policy of our country has paid more and more attention to the diversification of the dispute settlement mechanism in resolving social contradictions, adjusting social relations and remolding the important role of the social body. In the fourth Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee, the party also made clear that "to improve the prevention and solution mechanism of social contradictions and disputes, to perfect mediation, arbitration, administrative adjudication, administrative recovery". At present, the academic circle has basically reached a consensus, that is, to establish a diversified dispute resolution mechanism that can meet the various needs of the social subject is the future development direction of the construction of the rule of law in China. The author seriously analyses the solution of the multiple dispute resolution in Xiamen Special Economic Zone. In order to promote the regulations, formulate the regulations, formulate the background and the problems encountered in the process, this paper expounds the types and causes of the contradictions and disputes in the current rural society in detail, and points out the shortcomings of the existing dispute settlement mechanism in China according to the current situation of the dispute settlement, and puts forward some suggestions and problems to be solved on this basis. First, introduction, this chapter introduces the background, purpose and significance of the study, and expounds the research on the diversification of the dispute settlement mechanism at home and abroad. On this basis, this chapter puts forward the methods, paths and overall ideas of this study. Chapter 1, the general situation of China's rural legal dispute involving litigation, this chapter focuses on the current Chinese townships. In the village society, there are various disputes involving law involving litigation, and the types, characteristics and causes of the disputes are introduced in detail. After that, the factors that affect the settlement of the villagers' choice of disputes are analyzed in detail. The second chapter is the solution mechanism and shortcomings of the current rural related litigation disputes in China. This chapter from the current rural law related litigation dispute resolution machine in our country Starting with the system, this paper analyzes the shortcomings of different dispute settlement mechanisms in resolving disputes, which provides a realistic basis for the necessity and rationality of the diversified dispute settlement mechanism in the construction of rural society. The third chapter, the construction of a diversified settlement mechanism for rural legal disputes involving litigation disputes, this chapter introduces the meaning of the diversification dispute resolution mechanism. In view of the relationship between the mode and the reality, this paper points out the construction idea, strategy, and finally docked with the rural reality, and puts forward the legal regulation and the practical safeguard measures for the diversification dispute settlement mechanism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D926.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊小軍;;妥善處理涉法涉訴信訪 維護(hù)社會(huì)穩(wěn)定[J];行政管理改革;2010年12期

2 潘江濤;;回應(yīng)·引導(dǎo)·溝通——應(yīng)對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)涉法涉訴事件的體會(huì)[J];新聞實(shí)踐;2011年04期

3 劉志鵬;;涉法涉訴案件處置機(jī)制建設(shè)探討[J];公安研究;2009年09期

4 蘭池軍;;對(duì)當(dāng)前妥善處理涉法涉訴信訪案件的理性思考[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2011年09期

5 中共北京市委政法委員會(huì)課題組;劉大為;謝超;陳星言;牛曉銳;田奕彤;吉萌;;化解涉法涉訴進(jìn)京重復(fù)訪的對(duì)策研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年S1期

6 張正朝;;律師參與處理涉法涉訴案件探究[J];中國(guó)司法;2012年03期

7 楊林英;;對(duì)當(dāng)前涉法涉訴信訪的調(diào)查與思考[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年12期

8 賴?guó)櫫?;代表如何接待不同類型的來(lái)訪者[J];人民政壇;2008年12期

9 霍焰;;做好人大涉法涉訴信訪工作的思考[J];楚天主人;2009年12期

10 劉金川;田熙;戴珍萍;;人大試水監(jiān)督涉法涉訴典型信訪案[J];公民導(dǎo)刊;2010年02期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前3條

1 ;兩辦印發(fā)《關(guān)于依法處理涉法涉訴信訪問(wèn)題的意見(jiàn)》[A];貴州法學(xué)（2014年第4期）[C];2014年

2 羅聃;;以科學(xué)發(fā)展觀為統(tǒng)領(lǐng)解決涉法涉訴信訪突出問(wèn)題的調(diào)查與思考[A];創(chuàng)新沈陽(yáng)文集（D）[C];2009年

3 ;檢察機(jī)關(guān)涉法涉訴信訪改革將重點(diǎn)做好三方面工作[A];貴州法學(xué)（2014年第4期）[C];2014年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 記者 呂游;全市涉法涉訴專項(xiàng)工作推進(jìn)會(huì)在孫吳縣召開(kāi)[N];黑河日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

2 記者 邢爽;我市召開(kāi)涉法涉訴訪工作現(xiàn)場(chǎng)推進(jìn)會(huì)[N];黑河日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

3 劉愛(ài)國(guó)　通訊員　 朱丹;確保全市涉法涉訴工作位居全省前三[N];洛陽(yáng)日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

4 記者 蘇黎原;加快解決涉法涉訴信訪問(wèn)題[N];運(yùn)城日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

5 牛海英;“三個(gè)到位”處理好涉法涉訴信訪問(wèn)題[N];河北日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

6 陳海發(fā)邋冀天福;河南表彰涉法涉訴信訪先進(jìn)[N];人民法院報(bào);2008年

7 記者 孫鵬飛邋實(shí)習(xí)生 劉文鵬;加強(qiáng)涉法涉訴信訪源頭治理[N];平頂山日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

8 祝志永;德興設(shè)立涉法涉訴救助基金[N];上饒日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

9 通訊員 張吏君;臨河政法委五項(xiàng)措施處理涉法涉訴案件[N];巴彥淖爾日?qǐng)?bào)(漢);2008年

10 唐鳳偉　付相成 記者 米娜;對(duì)涉法涉訴越級(jí)訪追究責(zé)任[N];黑龍江日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 董紅梅;涉法涉訴信訪法治化路徑探析[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2015年

2 安建云;酒泉市涉法涉訴信訪問(wèn)題研究[D];燕山大學(xué);2015年

3 劉欣欣;當(dāng)前涉法涉訴信訪的困境及其出路[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2014年

4 吳學(xué)嘉;我國(guó)涉法涉訴信訪制度廢除探究[D];山東大學(xué);2016年

5 崔超;涉法涉訴信訪的現(xiàn)實(shí)困境和對(duì)策研究[D];河北大學(xué);2016年

6 蘇朝忠;公共治理視角下涉法涉訴信訪制度改革研究[D];華僑大學(xué);2015年

7 王鳳霞;涉法涉訴信訪制度研究[D];山東大學(xué);2016年

8 馮雪;律師參與涉法涉訴信訪案件制度研究[D];四川省社會(huì)科學(xué)院;2017年

9 劉慧星;律師參與涉法涉訴信訪工作機(jī)制研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2017年

10 劉子煬;演進(jìn)、分類與比較：J省律師介入涉法涉訴信訪工作模式研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2017年

，

本文編號(hào)：2073214