本文選題：翻供 + 非法證據(jù)排除�。� 參考：《華南理工大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：翻供是犯罪嫌疑人、被告人在刑事訴訟程序中的任何一個(gè)階段推翻原有供述的一部分或者全部，重新做出供述。翻供是我國(guó)獨(dú)有的一種司法現(xiàn)象。在長(zhǎng)期的司法實(shí)踐中，司法人員對(duì)翻供標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的界定、翻供發(fā)生的原因、翻供的處理方式都有不同的理解，對(duì)翻供現(xiàn)象的重視程度也不同。因此，為了提高案件處理的效率，過分主張打擊犯罪，掩蓋刑訊逼供、誘供等非法的取證方式，司法人員往往對(duì)翻供采取置之不理的態(tài)度。這不僅會(huì)忽視犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的人權(quán)保障，容易導(dǎo)致冤假錯(cuò)案，還會(huì)有損我國(guó)的司法公正和司法權(quán)威。要改變這種現(xiàn)狀有賴于分析翻供在我國(guó)較常見的原因及證據(jù)運(yùn)用規(guī)則，最后構(gòu)建理論和司法實(shí)踐層面的翻供應(yīng)對(duì)策略。 本文首先對(duì)翻供標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的進(jìn)行認(rèn)定，分析翻供的體現(xiàn)的多種形式，分析翻供在我國(guó)較常見的原因，主要是長(zhǎng)期以來(lái)對(duì)口供的過分依賴性而導(dǎo)致的刑訊逼供、誘供等非法取證方式的存在以及對(duì)無(wú)理翻供的懲治制度的缺失；其次，要理性的看待翻供，分析翻供存在的有利方面和不利方面，在新背景下翻供呈現(xiàn)的狀態(tài)，即翻供現(xiàn)象會(huì)越來(lái)越多，對(duì)檢察機(jī)關(guān)的挑戰(zhàn)性越來(lái)越大；第三，分析翻供現(xiàn)象的證據(jù)規(guī)則的適用，主要包括翻供的證據(jù)補(bǔ)強(qiáng)規(guī)則、翻供的證據(jù)印證規(guī)則在翻供案件中具有的價(jià)值和具體適用；最后，通過辯訴交易制度、“由證到供”的偵查模式的建立、訊問時(shí)的律師在場(chǎng)權(quán)等制度構(gòu)建和司法實(shí)踐操作方面來(lái)合理應(yīng)對(duì)翻供。
[Abstract]:Reversion is a criminal suspect, the defendant in any stage of the criminal proceedings to overturn part or all of the original confession, to make a new confession. Retraction is a unique judicial phenomenon in China. In the long-term judicial practice, the definition of the standard of reversion, the reason of the reversion, the treatment of the reversal of confession have different understanding, and the degree of attention to the phenomenon of reversion is also different. Therefore, in order to improve the efficiency of handling cases, excessively advocate to crack down on crime, cover up illegal methods of obtaining evidence, such as extorting confessions by torture and inducing confessions, judicial officers often ignore the attitude of turning back confessions. This will not only ignore the human rights protection of criminal suspects and defendants, but also damage the judicial justice and judicial authority of our country. To change this situation, it depends on the analysis of the common reasons and the rules of evidence application in our country, and the construction of theoretical and judicial practice strategies. In this paper, we first identify the standard of confession reversal, analyze the various forms of confession reversal, and analyze the common reasons of confession refoulement in China, mainly because of the excessive dependence on confessions, which has led to torture for a long time. The existence of illegal methods of obtaining evidence, such as inducement, and the lack of punishment system for unjustifiable confession; secondly, the rational treatment of reversion, the analysis of its advantages and disadvantages, and the state of reversion under the new background. That is, the phenomenon of reversion will become more and more challenging for the procuratorial organs; third, the application of the evidentiary rules for the analysis of the phenomenon of reversion mainly includes the rule of corroboration of the reversion. The evidence of reversion proves the value and concrete application of the rules in the reopening case; finally, through the plea bargaining system, the establishment of the investigation mode of "from evidence to evidence", The system construction and judicial practice operation of lawyer's right to be present during interrogation should deal with the reopening of confession reasonably.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 譚勁松;我國(guó)口供補(bǔ)強(qiáng)規(guī)則研究[J];法律適用;2003年05期

2 劉根菊;對(duì)翻供問題的探討[J];法學(xué);2000年07期

3 何天都;;翻供對(duì)策研究[J];遼寧公安司法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年01期

4 鄭高鍵;;被告人翻供案件證據(jù)認(rèn)定的基本思路——被告人翻供案件證據(jù)認(rèn)定系列論文之一[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年01期

5 鄭高鍵;;被告人翻供口供審查認(rèn)定的理論探討——對(duì)被告人翻供案件證據(jù)的認(rèn)定[J];西部法學(xué)評(píng)論;2009年03期

6 歐衛(wèi)安;;翻供的證據(jù)法意義[J];法學(xué)論壇;2007年01期

7 吳雯;刑事被告人在庭審中翻供的原因及對(duì)策[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1999年01期

8 吳丹紅;論共犯口供的證明力[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2001年05期

9 周國(guó)均;史立梅;;翻供之辨析與翻供者人權(quán)保障[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2005年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：2044694