發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-17 14:05

  本文選題：一事不再理 + 人權(quán)保障��； 參考：《遼寧大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：一事不再理原則,其作為刑事審判的一項(xiàng)基本原則,是世界上發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家都認(rèn)可并且予以接受的制度,在世界范圍內(nèi)已經(jīng)形成廣泛的共識(shí)。它從古羅馬法“一案不二訟”的法律制度中啟源,后經(jīng)過(guò)多少年的不斷發(fā)展和深入沉積,已經(jīng)演變?yōu)榱爽F(xiàn)代刑事訴訟中的一項(xiàng)不可缺少的重要原則,不但世界上大部分主要國(guó)家的刑事訴訟法己經(jīng)明確的把它認(rèn)定為刑事訴訟法的一項(xiàng)基本原則,并且一些世界性人權(quán)公約也把它視為刑事訴訟的一項(xiàng)基本的原則加以明確規(guī)定。因此,兩大法系分別沿著不通的方向發(fā)展,分成大陸法系即既判力形式的一事不再理原則與英美法系中禁止雙重危險(xiǎn)原則,兩大法系都明確的規(guī)定了不允許對(duì)被告人的同一個(gè)法律事實(shí)予以兩次追訴。但是二者的區(qū)別在于大陸法系的一事不再理原則突出的強(qiáng)調(diào)了案件判決既判力的穩(wěn)定性,而英美法系的禁止雙重危險(xiǎn)原則則重點(diǎn)強(qiáng)調(diào)關(guān)注對(duì)被告人人權(quán)的多方面保護(hù)。本文通過(guò)四部分論述了刑事訴訟中一事不再理原則的適用。第一部分通過(guò)對(duì)一事不再理原則法理基礎(chǔ)的詳細(xì)闡述,從法律層面上深入了解了一事不再理原則的具體內(nèi)涵。第二部分,通過(guò)對(duì)兩大法系多方面的對(duì)比,闡述了兩大法系對(duì)一事不再理問(wèn)題研究現(xiàn)狀的不同角度,更加深入了解一事不再理原則在世界范圍內(nèi)的適用情況。第三部分則闡述了一事不再理原則在我國(guó)訴訟程序的各個(gè)方面即起訴、審判、再審階段的適用情況,深入分析了我國(guó)對(duì)一事不再理原則的法律適用態(tài)度。第四部分則深入探討了一事不再理原則在我國(guó)的立法現(xiàn)狀以及立法完善、建議。文章系統(tǒng)分析和論證了現(xiàn)代意義上刑事訴訟一事不再理原則的理論基礎(chǔ)和法律程·序上的適用情況,以及在現(xiàn)代刑事訴訟多元化價(jià)值取向、自由、安全和效率的影響下,一事不再理原則在適用中的平衡和調(diào)整。我國(guó)從古至今就沒(méi)有確立一事不再理制度,但在目前,建立我國(guó)一事不再理原則已經(jīng)是一種大勢(shì)所趨,更何況我國(guó)當(dāng)前的法制環(huán)境已經(jīng)成熟,完全可以建成一事不再理原則。當(dāng)然,要想建成我國(guó)的一事不再理原則就必須從我國(guó)最基本的國(guó)情作為出發(fā)點(diǎn),因?yàn)楹痛箨懛ㄏ迪囝愃?那么可以考慮把大陸法系中一事不再理原則作為基礎(chǔ),與此同時(shí)借鑒英美法系的禁止雙重危險(xiǎn)原則中適用于我國(guó)的好的一面。建立一事不再理原則是一種系統(tǒng)的大工程,不僅要轉(zhuǎn)變?nèi)藗兊膫鹘y(tǒng)習(xí)慣思想而且要建立一套完善的配套制度加以輔助。
[Abstract]:As a basic principle of criminal trial, the principle of non bis in idem is recognized and accepted by developed countries in the world, and has formed a wide consensus in the world. It originated from the legal system of "one case without two cases" in ancient Roman law. After many years of continuous development and deep deposition, it has evolved into an indispensable and important principle in modern criminal proceedings. Not only the criminal procedure law of most major countries in the world has been clearly recognized as a basic principle of the criminal procedure law, but also some universal human rights conventions regard it as a basic principle of criminal procedure. Therefore, the two major legal systems developed in the direction of impassability, divided into the civil law system, that is, the res judicata non bis in idem principle and the prohibition of double risk principle in the Anglo-American law system. The two legal systems clearly stipulate that the same legal fact of the defendant is not allowed to be prosecuted twice. However, the difference between the two is that the principle of non bis in idem in civil law system emphasizes the stability of res judicata, while the principle of double risk in common law system emphasizes the protection of human rights of defendants in many aspects. This paper discusses the application of the principle of non bis in idem in criminal procedure through four parts. The first part, through the detailed elaboration of the legal basis of the principle of non bis in idem, deeply understands the concrete connotation of the principle of non bis in idem from the legal level. The second part, through the comparison of two legal systems in many aspects, elaborated the two legal systems on the issue of the two different angles of research on the issue of non bis in idem, a more in-depth understanding of the principle of non bis in idem in the world scope of application. The third part expounds the application of the principle of non bis in idem in all aspects of the litigation procedure in our country, that is, prosecution, trial and retrial, and analyzes deeply the legal applicable attitude of our country to the principle of non bis in idem. In the fourth part, the author deeply discusses the legislative status quo and the legislative perfection of the principle of non bis in idem in our country. This paper systematically analyzes and demonstrates the theoretical basis of the principle of non bis in idem in modern criminal procedure and the application of the legal procedure, and under the influence of diversified value orientation, freedom, safety and efficiency of modern criminal procedure. The balance and adjustment of the principle of non bis in idem in application. Since ancient times, China has not established a matter no longer reason system, but at present, the establishment of our country no matter no reason principle has been a general trend, let alone the current legal environment of our country has matured, we can complete the principle of no matter no reason. Of course, if we want to build the principle of non bis in idem in our country, we must start from the most basic national conditions of our country, because it is similar to the civil law system, so we can consider the principle of non bis in idem in the civil law system as the basis. At the same time, draw lessons from the Anglo-American law system of the prohibition of double-hazard principle applicable to China's good side. It is a systematic project to establish the principle of no matter principle. It is necessary not only to change people's traditional habits but also to establish a complete set of supporting systems to assist them.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 張貞;;從一事不再理原則反思我國(guó)刑事再審程序的完善[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年01期

2 徐瑩;;從一事不再理原則看我國(guó)的刑事再審程序[J];太原師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年05期

3 陳芬娟;;一事不再理原則與我國(guó)刑事再審程序之完善[J];嘉興學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年S1期

4 趙鐘;劉暉;;一事不再理與我國(guó)刑事再審程序的重構(gòu)[J];河南司法警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

5 胡銘;;聯(lián)合國(guó)刑事司法準(zhǔn)則視野下的再審程序改革——兼論一事不再理原則及其例外在我國(guó)的確立[J];研究生法學(xué);2005年01期

6 秦宗文;一事不再理原則與我國(guó)刑事程序改革研究[J];學(xué)術(shù)研究;2004年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 高賀仁;論我國(guó)刑事再審程序的改革與完善[D];浙江工業(yè)大學(xué);2012年

2 張道偉;一事不再理原則研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年

3 劉立新;一事不再理原則的確立與我國(guó)刑事再審程序的重構(gòu)[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2009年

4 蔡震宇;一事不再理的客觀范圍研究[D];浙江工商大學(xué);2008年

5 陳建輝;論刑事訴訟中一事不再理原則[D];湘潭大學(xué);2007年

6 馬蓓蕾;刑事訴訟一事不再理原則研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2006年

7 查小燕;論刑事訴訟中的一事不再理原則[D];四川大學(xué);2006年

8 湯茂定;刑事訴訟一事不再理原則研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2005年

9 毛忠強(qiáng);刑事訴訟一事不再理原則研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2005年

10 崔莉霞;論一事不再理原則[D];西南政法大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：2031315