發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-17 15:00

  本文選題：民事執(zhí)行 + 聽(tīng)證制度�。� 參考：《海南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證制度是為了保證民事執(zhí)行程序公正而推出的一項(xiàng)重要措施,從一開(kāi)始在一些法院試點(diǎn)運(yùn)行,到如今已經(jīng)歷時(shí)數(shù)載,在此過(guò)程中取得了初步的成效。但是,由于至今還沒(méi)有形成一部規(guī)范的、統(tǒng)一的民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證程序的法律規(guī)則,導(dǎo)致很多法院的民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證程序在實(shí)際運(yùn)行中出現(xiàn)了很多問(wèn)題,因此,關(guān)于民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證制度的具體法律規(guī)定還有待進(jìn)一步完善。我國(guó)民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證制度存在著諸多問(wèn)題,主要有適用民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證的范圍不統(tǒng)一、民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證未做到真正的裁執(zhí)分離、民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證程序不規(guī)范、民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證容易導(dǎo)致執(zhí)行程序久拖不執(zhí)、合議庭的作用形同虛設(shè)、民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證的證據(jù)規(guī)則不統(tǒng)一。出現(xiàn)上述這些問(wèn)題的原因,主要包括缺乏統(tǒng)一的執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證法律體系、長(zhǎng)期的重實(shí)體輕程序觀念以及執(zhí)行法官的綜合素質(zhì)普遍不高等因素。因此,為保障民事執(zhí)行當(dāng)事人的合法權(quán)利、完善民事執(zhí)行救濟(jì)、實(shí)現(xiàn)公平與效率,對(duì)我國(guó)民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證制度進(jìn)行進(jìn)一步的完善是有非常大的必要性的。并且,各地法院的實(shí)踐為執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證提供了良好的基礎(chǔ),司法改革為實(shí)施執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證提供了良好的法律環(huán)境,現(xiàn)行的法律機(jī)制使得執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證制度具有可能性,這些都為完善我國(guó)的民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證制度提供了可行性。在對(duì)我國(guó)的民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證制度進(jìn)行完善的過(guò)程中,必須要遵循民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證程序公開(kāi)原則、公正與效率原則、民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證職能分離原則以及民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證適度原則,從調(diào)整執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證的適用范圍、建立真正裁執(zhí)分離的機(jī)制、規(guī)范具體的民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證程序、防止當(dāng)事人濫用聽(tīng)證程序、完善重大事項(xiàng)合議決定制度以及建立民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證制度配套的證據(jù)規(guī)則等幾個(gè)方面來(lái)完善我國(guó)的民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證制度。
[Abstract]:The civil execution hearing system is an important measure to guarantee the fairness of the civil execution procedure. It has been running in some courts at the beginning and has been running for several years. In this process, it has achieved initial results. However, due to the lack of a standardized, unified legal rule of the civil execution hearing procedure, many problems have arisen in the actual operation of the civil execution hearing procedure in many courts. The specific legal provisions on the civil execution hearing system need to be further improved. There are many problems in the civil execution hearing system of our country. The main problems are that the scope of the civil execution hearing is not uniform, the civil execution hearing is not truly separated, the procedure of the civil execution hearing is not standardized, The civil execution hearing is easy to cause the execution procedure to be delayed for a long time, the function of the collegial panel is void, and the rules of evidence of the civil execution hearing are not uniform. The reasons for these problems mainly include the lack of a unified legal system of executive hearing, the long-term emphasis on substance and procedure, and the general lack of comprehensive quality of executive judges, and so on. Therefore, in order to protect the legal rights of civil enforcement parties, improve civil enforcement relief, achieve fairness and efficiency, it is necessary to further improve the civil execution hearing system in China. Moreover, the practice of local courts provides a good basis for the implementation of the hearing, judicial reform provides a good legal environment for the implementation of the hearing, and the current legal mechanism makes the system of executive hearing possible. All these have provided the feasibility for perfecting the civil execution hearing system of our country. In the process of perfecting the civil execution hearing system in our country, we must follow the principles of openness of civil execution hearing procedure, fairness and efficiency, separation of civil execution hearing function and moderate civil execution hearing. To regulate the scope of application of the executive hearing, to establish a mechanism for the separation of true adjudication and enforcement, to standardize the specific civil execution hearing procedures, and to prevent the parties from abusing the hearing procedures, To perfect the civil execution hearing system of our country, we should perfect the decision system of major matters and establish the supporting evidence rules of civil execution hearing system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：海南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 婁正前;;執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證程序的反思與完善[J];法律適用;2005年12期

2 雷運(yùn)龍;;芻議民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證制度的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];法學(xué)雜志;2006年06期

3 馮浩;;民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證制度改革初探[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年06期

4 盧君;馬登科;;民事執(zhí)行當(dāng)事人變動(dòng)的程序完善[J];法律適用;2013年01期

5 黃忠順;;論執(zhí)行當(dāng)事人變更與追加的理論基礎(chǔ)[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年02期

6 陸榮先;;論民事執(zhí)行程序的豐富與完善[J];法律適用;2013年09期

7 吳勇,楊文禮;試論民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證在我國(guó)的適用[J];湖南公安高等專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2004年06期

8 鄔凡敏;馮一文;;陪審員“陪執(zhí)”:司法民主化實(shí)踐的新探索——基于人民陪審員參與執(zhí)行機(jī)制之“北侖模式”的實(shí)證分析[J];寧波大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文科學(xué)版);2008年06期

9 李定毅;;我國(guó)聽(tīng)證法律的規(guī)范與實(shí)證分析[J];理論界;2013年02期

10 李昕,汪洋;論民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證的可行性[J];前沿;2005年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2031450