本文選題：新《刑訴法》 + 憲法　； 參考：《上海交通大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：權(quán)利和權(quán)力此消彼長，權(quán)利是權(quán)力存在的目的。2012年通過的《刑訴法》充滿了權(quán)力和權(quán)利的較量，在刑事強(qiáng)制措施中表現(xiàn)得最為顯著。對(duì)比新法和舊法，雖然修訂后的刑事強(qiáng)制措施在體系上比舊法更為完整、科學(xué)，一些細(xì)節(jié)性修改也體現(xiàn)了保障人權(quán)的傾向。但是，在涉及結(jié)構(gòu)性的權(quán)力和權(quán)利的平衡問題上呈現(xiàn)出嚴(yán)重的一邊倒傾向，即權(quán)力的擴(kuò)張遠(yuǎn)大于對(duì)權(quán)利的保障。拘傳時(shí)間延長，拘傳執(zhí)行方式有所變化；取保候?qū)彆r(shí)間被截?cái)嗍褂�，保證金沒收程序缺少救濟(jì)渠道；指定居所監(jiān)視居住適用范圍擴(kuò)大，家屬知情權(quán)被嚴(yán)重削弱；秘密拘留被“合法化”，權(quán)力主體之間缺乏有效制約；審前羈押是逮捕的當(dāng)然伴隨狀態(tài)，等等。這些都表明此次修法不但沒有達(dá)到“里程碑意義”的高度，，反而顛倒了權(quán)力和權(quán)利的應(yīng)然位置，導(dǎo)致權(quán)力優(yōu)位，沒有厘清打擊犯罪和保障人權(quán)的關(guān)系。 總之，此次修法不但沒有進(jìn)步，反而在一定程度上有所退步。修訂后的新法蘊(yùn)含了很大的人權(quán)危機(jī)，要想化解這些人權(quán)危機(jī)，需要充分發(fā)揮法律解釋和法律適用的功能，以合乎憲法的人權(quán)保障理念指導(dǎo)立法，以正當(dāng)程序?yàn)閮r(jià)值目標(biāo)規(guī)范執(zhí)法和司法，以權(quán)利監(jiān)督和權(quán)力制衡為架構(gòu)進(jìn)行制度設(shè)計(jì)，將憲法上的人權(quán)保障理念通過公正的制度設(shè)計(jì)落到實(shí)處。
[Abstract]:The Criminal procedure Law passed in 2012 is full of power and power, which is the most obvious in the criminal coercive measures. Compared with the new law and the old law, although the revised criminal coercive measures are more complete and scientific in system than the old law, some detailed amendments also reflect the tendency of protecting human rights. However, there is a serious one-sided tendency in the balance of power and rights, that is, the expansion of power is far greater than the protection of rights. The time of detention is prolonged, the execution mode of detention is changed; the time of obtaining bail is cut off, the procedure of bond confiscation is lack of relief channel; the scope of residence monitoring is expanded and the right to know of the family is seriously weakened; Secret detention is "legalized", lack of effective restriction between power subjects, pretrial detention is the state of arrest, and so on. All these indicate that the law has not reached the "milestone level", on the contrary, it has reversed the position of power and rights, resulting in the superior position of power, and has failed to clarify the relationship between fighting crime and protecting human rights. In short, the revision of the law not only did not progress, but to some extent retrogression. The revised new law contains a great human rights crisis. In order to resolve these human rights crises, it is necessary to give full play to the functions of law interpretation and legal application, and guide the legislation with the constitutional concept of human rights protection. The value goal of due process is to standardize law enforcement and judicature, to design the system with the framework of right supervision and power balance, and to put the concept of human rights protection in the constitution into practice through fair system design.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 季衛(wèi)東;程序比較論[J];比較法研究;1993年01期

2 童之偉;;法權(quán)中心主義要點(diǎn)及其法學(xué)應(yīng)用[J];東方法學(xué);2011年01期

3 謝佑平;論我國強(qiáng)制措施的完善[J];湖南社會(huì)科學(xué);2004年01期

4 左衛(wèi)民;;指定監(jiān)視居住的制度性思考[J];法商研究;2012年03期

5 李鐘;劉浪;;監(jiān)視居住制度評(píng)析——以2011年《刑事訴訟法修正案(草案)》為視角[J];法學(xué)雜志;2012年01期

6 宋英輝;;關(guān)于取保候?qū)忂m用具體問題的調(diào)研分析[J];法學(xué);2008年06期

7 孫煜華;;指定居所監(jiān)視居住的合憲性審視[J];法學(xué);2013年06期

8 丁軍青,戚錦洲;如何用好傳喚、拘傳后的十二小時(shí)[J];法學(xué)天地;1997年04期

9 高一飛;聶子龍;;打擊犯罪與保護(hù)人權(quán)的艱難平衡——評(píng)刑訴法修正案中偵查程序部分中的爭(zhēng)議問題[J];河北法學(xué);2012年02期

10 劉纓;孫美;;論我國刑事強(qiáng)制措施的制度缺陷及完善[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2008年11期

本文編號(hào)：2030782