本文選題：審判中心主義 + 司法證明�。� 參考：《浙江社會(huì)科學(xué)》2017年01期

【摘要】：以審判為中心的庭審實(shí)質(zhì)化改革就是要求訴訟證據(jù)出示在法庭、案件事實(shí)查明在法庭,這即是要求控辯審三方間的司法證明也必須展現(xiàn)在法庭。創(chuàng)新與審判中心主義相適應(yīng)的司法證明理論是刑事訴訟制度改革的重要內(nèi)容。由于司法證明高度符合"論辯論證"的目的性、多主體、動(dòng)態(tài)性和對(duì)話式等特點(diǎn),因而司法證明是作為論辯論證的。從論辯論證的視角看,司法證明是一個(gè)控訴方和辯護(hù)方提出支持論證支持其主張,提出反論證辯護(hù)其主張,從而試圖說(shuō)服審判方接受其主張的論辯論證,在這一過(guò)程中審判方需要認(rèn)證證據(jù)的合法性、客觀性和相關(guān)性,從而評(píng)估雙方的論證,檢驗(yàn)是否符合一定的證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn),判定是否滿足相應(yīng)的舉證責(zé)任和說(shuō)服責(zé)任。
[Abstract]:The essential reform of trial is to require the evidence to be produced in court and the facts of the case to be found in the court, which means that the judicial proof between the three parties of prosecution and defence must also be displayed in the court. The innovation of judicial proof theory adapted to judicial centralism is an important part of the reform of criminal procedure system. Because the judicial proof accords with the purpose, multi-subject, dynamic and dialogue style of "argumentation", the judicial proof is the argumentative argumentation. From the point of view of argumentation, judicial proof is a kind of argumentative argument in which the prosecution and the defence put forward supporting arguments to support their claims, and put forward counter-arguments to defend their claims, thus trying to persuade the judges to accept their claims. In this process, the judge needs to authenticate the legality, objectivity and relevance of the evidence, so as to evaluate the argument of both sides, to test whether the proof meets a certain standard of proof, and to determine whether the burden of proof and the burden of persuasion are satisfied.
【作者單位】： 西南政法大學(xué)行政法學(xué)院;
【基金】：教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)研究青年基金項(xiàng)目“刑事冤假錯(cuò)案發(fā)現(xiàn)的分析和評(píng)估模型研究”(15YJCZH182) 國(guó)家社科基金重點(diǎn)項(xiàng)目“法律論證邏輯研究——面向‘法治中國(guó)’建設(shè)的整合性和應(yīng)用性研究”(15AZX019)的階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 何家弘;;司法證明的目的是客觀真實(shí) 司法證明的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)是法律真實(shí)[J];訴訟法論叢;2002年00期

2 賀林波;;論開(kāi)放性司法證明理論[J];社科縱橫;2007年06期

3 張錚;;論司法證明的性質(zhì)[J];燕山大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年S1期

4 賀林波;;司法證明過(guò)程的性質(zhì)——司法證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的制度性替代[J];江蘇技術(shù)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

5 溫建輝;;論司法證明方法的第三次轉(zhuǎn)變[J];聊城大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年03期

6 張，

本文編號(hào)：2030607