本文選題：刑事訴訟 + 辯護(hù)律師�。� 參考：《遼寧大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：辯護(hù)律師的豁免權(quán)是刑事訴訟法中一個重要的制度。由于刑事責(zé)任是所有法律責(zé)任中最嚴(yán)厲的，因此在刑事訴訟中，保障犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的權(quán)利是非常有必要的。而辯護(hù)律師，作為犯罪嫌疑人，被告人合法權(quán)利的專門維護(hù)者，保障辯護(hù)律師的人身權(quán)等合法權(quán)益，相當(dāng)于對當(dāng)事人權(quán)利的保障。令人高興的是，我國的律師法已經(jīng)確立了辯護(hù)律師豁免權(quán)這一制度。但是，我們也應(yīng)該看到，我國辯護(hù)律師的豁免權(quán)制度仍然存在許多不合理的地方。立法上關(guān)于這一制度的規(guī)定比較籠統(tǒng)，而且一些法律制度損害了律師豁免權(quán)的實施。如何更好的落實律師豁免權(quán)制度，使之更好的維護(hù)當(dāng)事人和辯護(hù)律師的合法權(quán)益，促進(jìn)社會的公平正義，是本文所要研究的內(nèi)容。 本文的正文主要由四部分組成: 第一部分，介紹了辯護(hù)律師豁免權(quán)的概念、特征、和賦予辯護(hù)律師豁免權(quán)的意義。使我們對這一制度有一個概括的了解，設(shè)立這一制度有什么好處。 第二部分主要是對國外辯護(hù)律師豁免權(quán)這一制度的考察。通過對英國、美國法國以及其他國家和國際組織關(guān)于這一制度的規(guī)定，研究一下他們有哪個合理的和值得借鑒的地方，從而為我國辯護(hù)律師豁免權(quán)制度的發(fā)展提供借鑒。 第三部分和第四部分是本文的重點，第三部分闡述了我國辯護(hù)律師豁免權(quán)存在的問題。探討了我國辯護(hù)律師豁免權(quán)不完善的原因，主要總結(jié)了四個方面的原因，豁免權(quán)的時間上，內(nèi)容上，法律規(guī)定以及保護(hù)機(jī)制不健全四個方面進(jìn)行論述。 最后一部分，在第三部分找到原因的基礎(chǔ)上，借鑒其他國家的經(jīng)驗，要對這一制度進(jìn)行完善。要將辯護(hù)律師豁免權(quán)時間擴(kuò)大到訴訟的各個階段，修改相關(guān)的法律法規(guī)，使其與辯護(hù)律師豁免權(quán)的相關(guān)規(guī)定做到一致，增加辯護(hù)律師豁免權(quán)中的作證豁免，如果律師的行為可能被追究刑事責(zé)任時，通過設(shè)立前置程序的形式，使得律師的權(quán)利有制度上的保障。
[Abstract]:Immunity of defence counsel is an important system in criminal procedure law. Since criminal liability is the most severe of all legal responsibilities, it is necessary to protect the rights of suspects and defendants in criminal proceedings. The defense lawyer, as a criminal suspect, the defendant legal rights of the specialized defenders, to protect defense lawyers' personal rights and other legitimate rights and interests, is equivalent to the protection of the rights of the parties. It is gratifying to note that our lawyers' law has established the system of defense lawyer immunity. However, we should also see that there are still many unreasonable places in the immunity system of defense counsel in our country. Legislative provisions on this system are general, and some legal systems undermine the implementation of lawyers' immunity. How to better implement the lawyer immunity system, make it better protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties and defense lawyers, promote social fairness and justice, is the content of this paper. The main body of this paper is composed of four parts: the first part introduces the concept, characteristics and significance of defense lawyer immunity. Give us a general understanding of the system and the benefits of its establishment. The second part is the investigation of the system of immunity of foreign defense counsel. Through the regulations on this system made by Britain, France, other countries and international organizations, the author makes a study of what is reasonable and worthy of learning from them, so as to provide a reference for the development of the immunity system of defense counsel in our country. The third part and the fourth part are the emphases of this article, the third part elaborated the defense lawyer immunity existence question in our country. This paper probes into the reasons for the imperfection of the immunity of defense counsel in our country, and mainly summarizes the reasons in four aspects: the time of immunity, the content, the legal provisions and the imperfect protection mechanism. In the last part, on the basis of finding out the reasons in the third part, we should perfect this system by drawing on the experience of other countries. It is necessary to extend the period of defense lawyer immunity to all stages of the proceedings, amend relevant laws and regulations, and make it consistent with the relevant provisions on defense lawyer immunity, and increase the immunity from testifying in defense counsel immunity. If the lawyer's behavior may be investigated for criminal responsibility, the lawyer's rights can be protected systematically by establishing the form of pre-procedure.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐曉波;江兆存;;控辯平衡視野下的律師辯護(hù)豁免權(quán)保護(hù)[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年21期

2 王永杰;;律師偽證罪的存廢之爭[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年04期

3 郭賜s，

本文編號：2026820