本文選題：未成年人 + 犯罪記錄�。� 參考：《華南理工大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：未成年人犯罪記錄封存程序的設(shè)計(jì)體現(xiàn)了國(guó)家對(duì)未成年犯罪人這一特殊群體權(quán)益的保護(hù)。封存未成年人的犯罪記錄旨在促進(jìn)未成年犯罪人能夠順利的回歸社會(huì)。未成年人犯罪封存程序在我國(guó)的運(yùn)行時(shí)間較短，，其在具體的實(shí)踐運(yùn)行存在一定的問(wèn)題，為了充分發(fā)揮其特有的保護(hù)與矯正功能，本文通過(guò)分析我國(guó)未成年人犯罪記錄封存程序的現(xiàn)狀，考察域外的相關(guān)規(guī)定，在此基礎(chǔ)上力求為我國(guó)的未成年人犯罪記錄封存程序的完善提出相應(yīng)的構(gòu)想。本文正文分為四個(gè)部分： 第一部分是未成年人犯罪記錄封存程序的概述。首先從未成年人犯罪記錄封存程序的概念和具體內(nèi)容兩個(gè)方面闡述了其內(nèi)涵；然后分析了設(shè)計(jì)該程序需要考慮哪些因素；最后對(duì)我國(guó)未成年人犯罪記錄封存程序中存在的問(wèn)題作了概括性的分析。 第二部分是我國(guó)未成年人犯罪記錄封存的啟動(dòng)程序。未成年人犯罪記錄封存可依職權(quán)啟動(dòng)，也可依申請(qǐng)啟動(dòng)。依申請(qǐng)啟動(dòng)可以放寬申請(qǐng)主體的范圍以更好的保護(hù)未成年犯罪人的利益。刑度和罪質(zhì)體現(xiàn)的是對(duì)未成年人之前犯罪行為的評(píng)價(jià)，并不能體現(xiàn)出未成年人的改造情況。設(shè)置一定的考驗(yàn)期限考察未成年人是否是真心悔過(guò)，未成年人在具備了真心悔過(guò)的條件才能申請(qǐng)封存犯罪記錄。 第三部分是我國(guó)未成年人犯罪記錄封存的審查決定程序。原審法院作為封存審核機(jī)關(guān)具有一定的的合理性，法院可以采用書面審和聽證的方式相結(jié)合決定是否封存未成年人的犯罪記錄。對(duì)于案件情況簡(jiǎn)單、爭(zhēng)議較小的案件可以采用法官獨(dú)任制以提高效率；而案件情況較為復(fù)雜、爭(zhēng)議較大的案件則要由合議庭評(píng)議之后進(jìn)行裁決。 第四部分是我國(guó)未成年人犯罪記錄封存的救濟(jì)程序。未成年人在自己的犯罪記錄被違規(guī)處理權(quán)益受到侵害時(shí)、未成年人犯罪案件中被害人的權(quán)利受損時(shí)可以尋求相應(yīng)的救濟(jì)，以保障各自權(quán)利的實(shí)現(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:The design of the criminal record sealing procedure of minors embodies the protection of the special group's rights and interests of the juvenile delinquency. The record of the minors' criminal record is aimed at promoting the juvenile delinquency to return to the society smoothly. The operation time of the juvenile delinquency procedure in China is short, and it is in the concrete practice. In a certain problem, in order to give full play to its special protection and correction function, this article analyzes the current status of the procedure for the recording and sealing of juvenile delinquency records in our country and examines the relevant provisions outside the region. On this basis, it tries to put forward the corresponding conception for the improvement of the procedure for the recording of juvenile delinquency in our country. The text is divided into four parts. :
The first part is an overview of the procedure for the record sealing of juvenile delinquency records. First, the concept and the specific content of the procedure for the closure of the adult criminal record are discussed in two aspects, and then the factors which need to be considered in the design of the procedure are analyzed. A comprehensive analysis.
The second part is the starting procedure for the record sealing of juvenile delinquency records in China. The criminal record seal of minors may be started in accordance with the authority and may be initiated according to the application. The scope of the application subject can be relaxed to protect the interests of the juvenile delinquency in accordance with the application. The penalty and the quality of the crime are the evaluation of the criminal behavior before the minors. It does not reflect the reform of the minors. It is true that it is truly repentant to set a certain test period to investigate the minors, and the minors can apply for the record of the sequestration in the case of genuine repentance.
The third part is the procedure for examining and determining the record of juvenile delinquency in China. The court of original trial is reasonable as a storage audit institution, and the court can adopt a combination of written and hearings to decide whether to seal the criminal record of minors. In order to improve the efficiency of the system of official Independence, the case is more complicated, and the controversial cases should be judged by the collegiate bench.
The fourth part is the relief procedure for the record seal of juvenile delinquency in China. When the minors are infringed on their own criminal records, the rights of the victims in juvenile delinquency can be sought to ensure their rights.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 彭新林;;論前科消滅制度的正當(dāng)性根據(jù)[J];北方法學(xué);2008年05期

2 高銘暄;;寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)刑事政策與酌定量刑情節(jié)的適用[J];法學(xué)雜志;2007年01期

3 曾新華;;論未成年人輕罪犯罪記錄封存制度——我國(guó)新《刑事訴訟法》第275條之理解與適用[J];法學(xué)雜志;2012年06期

4 林勁松;我國(guó)合議庭評(píng)議制度反思[J];法學(xué);2005年10期

5 趙國(guó)玲;李強(qiáng);;我國(guó)未成年人前科消滅制度實(shí)證研究[J];青少年犯罪問(wèn)題;2010年01期

6 牛傳勇;;我國(guó)未成年人輕罪犯罪記錄消滅程序的構(gòu)想[J];青少年犯罪問(wèn)題;2011年06期

7 王明明;;未成年人前科消除制度論——兼評(píng)刑事訴訟法修正案(草案)第95條犯罪記錄封存制度[J];中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年06期

8 康均心;尹露;;我國(guó)前科消滅制度新論[J];法治研究;2012年11期

9 馬艷君;;未成年人犯罪記錄封存制度實(shí)踐設(shè)想[J];法學(xué)雜志;2013年05期

10 汪建成;;犯罪記錄封存制度的完善建議[J];法制資訊;2012年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李健;論前科消滅制度及其構(gòu)建[D];吉林大學(xué);2012年

本文編號(hào)：2019327