發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-14 11:57

  本文選題：通訊監(jiān)察 + 價(jià)值沖突��； 參考：《北方工業(yè)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：全文共分五個(gè)部分,對(duì)通訊監(jiān)察制度進(jìn)行初步探討,分別介紹國(guó)外關(guān)于通訊監(jiān)察制度的立法現(xiàn)狀,我國(guó)通訊監(jiān)察制度的現(xiàn)狀及不足分析,并針對(duì)這一現(xiàn)狀,結(jié)合國(guó)外相關(guān)立法、對(duì)我國(guó)通訊監(jiān)察制度的構(gòu)建提出建議。 第一部分介紹通訊監(jiān)察的概念、特征、性質(zhì)及通訊監(jiān)察法制化的概念。我國(guó)并沒(méi)有通訊監(jiān)察的概念,所以本文首先介紹監(jiān)聽(tīng)的概念,明確監(jiān)聽(tīng)與通訊監(jiān)察概念的區(qū)別,通過(guò)討論學(xué)術(shù)界關(guān)于通訊監(jiān)察概念的爭(zhēng)議及各個(gè)國(guó)家對(duì)于通訊監(jiān)察概念的態(tài)度,進(jìn)而提出本人的觀點(diǎn),明細(xì)通訊監(jiān)察之所指及通訊監(jiān)察的性質(zhì)。同時(shí)基于我國(guó)立法現(xiàn)狀,提出通訊監(jiān)察法制化的概念。 第二部分論述通訊監(jiān)察法制化的必要性。通訊監(jiān)察既有其在偵查犯罪方面的優(yōu)越性,同時(shí)也有其對(duì)人民權(quán)利侵害之弊端。因此,只有將通訊監(jiān)察措施進(jìn)行法制化規(guī)制,才能最大程度的尋求利弊的平衡。本部分分別從通訊監(jiān)察法制化對(duì)偵查權(quán)的制約、對(duì)公民權(quán)利的保障、符合法制化建設(shè)的必然要求及國(guó)際發(fā)展趨勢(shì)等四個(gè)方面論述通訊監(jiān)察法制化的必要性。 第三部分是域外法通訊監(jiān)察法制化比較研究。根據(jù)所掌握的材料,本部分將西方各國(guó)家對(duì)通訊監(jiān)察的相關(guān)立法,分別從立法模式、適用條件、適用程序、監(jiān)督與制約及對(duì)被監(jiān)察人權(quán)利的救濟(jì)等方面來(lái)梳理,以作為我國(guó)的立法參考。 第四部分是我國(guó)通訊監(jiān)察制度存在的問(wèn)題。長(zhǎng)期以來(lái),我國(guó)并沒(méi)有將通訊監(jiān)察制度納入立法范圍,刑事訴訟法雖然對(duì)技術(shù)偵查做了規(guī)定,但是缺乏具體可操作性。實(shí)踐中,通訊監(jiān)察的隨意性很大,長(zhǎng)期處于“脫軌”的狀態(tài),從而折射出我國(guó)傳統(tǒng)法制觀念的相對(duì)落后。 第五部分大膽對(duì)我國(guó)通訊監(jiān)察制度提出完善建議。首先提出我國(guó)構(gòu)建通訊監(jiān)察制度應(yīng)當(dāng)遵循的基本原則,然后分別從適用范圍、發(fā)動(dòng)程序、執(zhí)行程序、所獲信息的處理、監(jiān)督及權(quán)利保障、證據(jù)使用及排除等方面設(shè)計(jì)出一套符合我國(guó)國(guó)情、適合我國(guó)司法體制、具有可操作性的方案,以期對(duì)我國(guó)通訊監(jiān)察制度的構(gòu)建做出貢獻(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:The full text is divided into five parts, the paper discusses the communication supervision system, introduces the current legislation of the communication supervision system abroad, analyzes the present situation and deficiency of the communication supervision system in our country, and combines with the relevant legislation of foreign countries. Some suggestions on the construction of communication supervision system in China are put forward. The first part introduces the concept, characteristics, nature and legalization of communication supervision. China does not have the concept of communication supervision, so this paper first introduces the concept of monitoring, clear the difference between the concept of monitoring and communication supervision, through the discussion of academic controversy on the concept of communication supervision and the attitude of each country to the concept of communication supervision. Then I put forward my point of view, the details of communication monitoring and the nature of communication monitoring. At the same time, based on the current situation of legislation in China, the concept of legalization of communication supervision is put forward. The second part discusses the necessity of legalization of communication supervision. Communication supervision has not only its superiority in crime investigation, but also its abuse to people's rights. Therefore, only by legalizing the communication supervision measures, can we find the best balance between advantages and disadvantages. This part discusses the necessity of the legalization of communication supervision from four aspects: the restriction of the investigation power, the protection of the civil rights, the inevitable requirement of the construction of the legal system and the trend of international development. The third part is a comparative study on the legal system of communication supervision in the extraterritorial law. According to the material we have, this part sorts out the relevant legislation of the western countries on communication supervision from the aspects of legislative model, applicable conditions, applicable procedure, supervision and restriction, and relief to the rights of the supervised person, etc. As the legislative reference of our country. The fourth part is the problems existing in the communication supervision system of our country. For a long time, communication supervision system has not been brought into the scope of legislation in our country. Although the criminal procedure law provides for technical investigation, it is lack of specific maneuverability. In practice, communication supervision is very arbitrary and has been in a state of "derailment" for a long time, which reflects the relative backwardness of the traditional concept of legal system in our country. The fifth part boldly puts forward the perfect suggestion to our country's communication supervision system. First of all, it puts forward the basic principles that should be followed in the construction of communication supervision system in our country, and then separately from the scope of application, initiating procedures, executing procedures, handling, supervising and protecting the information obtained, In order to make a contribution to the construction of communication supervision system in China, the author designs a set of schemes which are suitable for our country's judicial system, suitable for the judicial system and operable in order to make a contribution to the construction of our country's communication supervision system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北方工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 李明;監(jiān)聽(tīng)問(wèn)題立法研究[J];法學(xué);2004年07期

2 章禮明;我國(guó)通訊監(jiān)聽(tīng)訴訟規(guī)則之建構(gòu)[J];河北法學(xué);2004年01期

3 楊寅;普通法傳統(tǒng)中的自然正義原則[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年03期

4 徐美君;論監(jiān)聽(tīng)的界限[J];山東公安�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2004年03期

5 陳學(xué)權(quán);;偵查機(jī)關(guān)通過(guò)監(jiān)聽(tīng)所獲材料之證據(jù)能力研究[J];浙江社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年12期

，

本文編號(hào)：2017296