本文選題：民事訴訟調(diào)解 + 檢察監(jiān)督�。� 參考：《遼寧大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：公正與效率的均衡是現(xiàn)代法治社會(huì)的基本價(jià)值追求。面對(duì)日益多樣性的社會(huì)矛盾糾紛,完備的糾紛解決機(jī)制必不可少。我國(guó)的民事訴訟調(diào)解制度,從本質(zhì)上來(lái)說(shuō),也是作為一種對(duì)民事判決起補(bǔ)充和替代作用的糾紛解決方式而存在的,因此,是現(xiàn)代多元糾紛解決機(jī)制不可或缺的有機(jī)組成部分。但我國(guó)的民事訴訟調(diào)解制度在立法上規(guī)定的過(guò)于原則化,不利于具體操作,導(dǎo)致司法活動(dòng)中問(wèn)題調(diào)解類(lèi)案件的不斷產(chǎn)生。具體如新《民事訴訟法》對(duì)民事調(diào)解檢察監(jiān)督的相關(guān)規(guī)定采用粗放型立法,致使法條適用爭(zhēng)議大,概念界定難等一系列問(wèn)題的產(chǎn)生,如第二百零八條中“發(fā)現(xiàn)”的主體界定關(guān)系到檢察監(jiān)督的啟動(dòng)方式,對(duì)“國(guó)家利益、社會(huì)公共利益”的界定則是關(guān)系到檢察監(jiān)督范圍如何確定,再比如就民事調(diào)解檢察監(jiān)督具體程序的規(guī)定也存在不足之處,給檢察機(jī)關(guān)行使監(jiān)督權(quán)留下很大的自由裁量空間。本文正文包括四個(gè)部分,第一部分是關(guān)于民事訴訟調(diào)解檢察監(jiān)督制度的基本性概述,首先闡述什么是民事訴訟調(diào)解檢察監(jiān)督制度,緊接著分析了民事訴訟調(diào)解檢察監(jiān)督權(quán)區(qū)別于一般法律監(jiān)督權(quán)的特征和原則。第二部分總結(jié)出檢察機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)民事訴訟調(diào)解制度進(jìn)行必要監(jiān)督的獨(dú)特價(jià)值所在,對(duì)于維護(hù)整個(gè)國(guó)家的司法公正、樹(shù)立和強(qiáng)化司法權(quán)威都有著不可替代的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。第三部分客觀分析了我國(guó)民事訴訟調(diào)解檢察監(jiān)督制度的現(xiàn)存問(wèn)題,以及導(dǎo)致各類(lèi)問(wèn)題的原因。第四部分就現(xiàn)行法律及司法解釋中關(guān)于民事訴訟調(diào)解檢察監(jiān)督的法律規(guī)定中仍然存在的缺陷和現(xiàn)實(shí)性問(wèn)題進(jìn)行總結(jié),提出相應(yīng)的完善建議,希望在未來(lái)的相關(guān)立法中擴(kuò)大我國(guó)民事訴訟調(diào)解檢察監(jiān)督的范圍,如《民事訴訟法》中“損害國(guó)家利益、社會(huì)公共利益”調(diào)解書(shū),增加類(lèi)型包括“損害第三人合法權(quán)益”,使案外第三人依托檢察監(jiān)督制度進(jìn)而獲得救濟(jì);強(qiáng)調(diào)注意區(qū)分抗訴與檢察建議適用不同調(diào)解類(lèi)型的案件;建立銜接機(jī)制等,確保民事訴訟調(diào)解檢察監(jiān)督制度能夠全面、準(zhǔn)確、有效實(shí)施。
[Abstract]:The balance between justice and efficiency is the basic value pursuit of modern society ruled by law. In the face of increasingly diverse social contradictions and disputes, a complete dispute resolution mechanism is essential. The mediation system of civil action in our country, in essence, also exists as a kind of dispute settlement method which is complementary to and substitute for civil judgment. Therefore, it is an indispensable part of the modern pluralistic dispute resolution mechanism. However, the system of civil litigation mediation in our country is too principled in legislation, which is not conducive to concrete operation and leads to the continuous emergence of mediation cases in judicial activities. Specifically, for example, the new Civil procedure Law adopts extensive legislation on the relevant provisions of the procuratorial supervision of civil mediation, resulting in a series of problems, such as the dispute over the application of the law, the difficulty in defining the concept, and so on. For example, the definition of the subject of "discovery" in Article 208 is related to the starting mode of procuratorial supervision, and the definition of "national interest, social public interest" is related to how to determine the scope of procuratorial supervision. For example, the provisions on the specific procedures of civil mediation procuratorial supervision also have shortcomings, leaving a lot of discretion for the procuratorial organs to exercise the supervisory power. The text of this paper includes four parts, the first part is about the basic overview of the procuratorial supervision system of civil litigation mediation, first of all, it expounds what is the civil litigation mediation procuratorial supervision system. Then it analyzes the characteristics and principles of the procuratorial supervision power of civil litigation mediation which is different from the general legal supervision power. The second part summarizes the unique value of the procuratorial organs to the necessary supervision of the mediation system of civil proceedings, which is of irreplaceable practical significance for safeguarding the judicial justice of the whole country and establishing and strengthening the judicial authority. The third part objectively analyzes the existing problems of the procuratorial supervision system of civil litigation mediation in China, and the causes of all kinds of problems. The fourth part summarizes the defects and practical problems in the current law and judicial interpretation about the civil litigation mediation procuratorial supervision, and puts forward the corresponding improvement suggestions. The author hopes to expand the scope of procuratorial supervision of mediation in civil litigation in the future, such as "damage to the interests of the state and public interest" in the Civil procedure Law, and the additional types include "harming the legitimate rights and interests of the third party". To enable the third party outside the case to rely on the procuratorial supervision system to obtain relief; to emphasize that attention should be paid to distinguishing between the protest and the procuratorial proposal to apply different types of mediation cases; and to establish a bridging mechanism to ensure that the procuratorial supervision system for civil litigation mediation can be comprehensive and accurate. Effective implementation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李浩;;虛假訴訟與對(duì)調(diào)解書(shū)的檢察監(jiān)督[J];法學(xué)家;2014年06期

2 陳定良;周琪;;試析民事調(diào)解檢察監(jiān)督的范圍及方式[J];宜春學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年11期

3 熊躍敏;;承繼與超越:新民事訴訟法檢察監(jiān)督制度解讀[J];國(guó)家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年02期

4 湯維建;齊天宇;;漂移的中國(guó)民事調(diào)解制度[J];比較法研究;2012年05期

5 劉佳;;論民事調(diào)解檢察監(jiān)督的困境與出路[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年18期

6 黃曉豐;;民事調(diào)解檢察監(jiān)督的實(shí)現(xiàn)路徑[J];人民檢察;2012年11期

7 楊麗娟;;論民事調(diào)解的檢察監(jiān)督制度[J];赤峰學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(漢文哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年04期

8 王亞明;;訴訟調(diào)解檢察監(jiān)督路徑研究[J];福建法學(xué);2011年04期

9 李加立;林春艷;;論對(duì)法院民事調(diào)解的檢察監(jiān)督[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2011年05期

10 范衛(wèi)國(guó);郭魏;;論民事調(diào)解的檢察監(jiān)督制度[J];江南論壇;2010年06期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 湯維建;;民事訴訟法律監(jiān)督基本原則的新發(fā)展[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：2004931