本文選題：民事程序性爭(zhēng)議 + 主觀心理狀態(tài)　； 參考：《法學(xué)論壇》2017年05期

【摘要】：當(dāng)事人實(shí)施某項(xiàng)訴訟行為時(shí)的主觀心理狀態(tài)是民事訴訟中解決部分程序性爭(zhēng)議的關(guān)鍵和難點(diǎn)之所在。鑒于當(dāng)事人主觀心理狀態(tài)的內(nèi)在性、復(fù)雜性和難以直接判斷性,常規(guī)的證明方法已難以在此類糾紛的解決過(guò)程中發(fā)揮有效作用,對(duì)當(dāng)事人在民事訴訟中主觀心理狀態(tài)的查明具有區(qū)別于對(duì)一般案件事實(shí)查明的特殊性,為此創(chuàng)設(shè)符合其產(chǎn)生原因和表現(xiàn)規(guī)律的新型證明方法是有效處理該類糾紛的方案之所在。在當(dāng)事人主張自己的主觀意思表示受到法院審判行為的不正當(dāng)干預(yù)時(shí),其應(yīng)首先對(duì)審判行為不正當(dāng)進(jìn)行順向疏明,然后再由法院對(duì)審判行為的正當(dāng)性進(jìn)行逆向證明。在司法機(jī)關(guān)依職權(quán)查明當(dāng)事人之間是否存在惡意串通時(shí),其應(yīng)在一定的證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)之下,根據(jù)相關(guān)行為的間接證據(jù)對(duì)當(dāng)事人的主觀心理狀態(tài)進(jìn)行推定。
[Abstract]:The subjective state of mind is the key and difficulty in resolving some procedural disputes in civil litigation. In view of the inherent nature of the subjective psychological state of the parties concerned, the complexity and the difficulty of judging directly, the conventional methods of proof have been difficult to play an effective role in the settlement of such disputes. The identification of the subjective psychological state of the parties in civil proceedings is different from that of the facts of a general case. Therefore, the creation of a new method of proof which accords with the causes and performance rules of the dispute is the solution to deal with the dispute effectively. When the parties claim that their subjective intention is unjustly interfered by the court's trial behavior, they should first make the trial improper in the following direction, and then the court should prove the justice of the trial act in reverse. When the judicial organs find out whether there is malicious collusion between the parties according to their functions, they should infer the subjective psychological state of the parties according to the indirect evidence of the relevant acts under a certain standard of proof.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)政法大學(xué)訴訟法學(xué)研究院;
【基金】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)《刑民交叉案件程序問(wèn)題研究》青年教師學(xué)術(shù)創(chuàng)新團(tuán)隊(duì)項(xiàng)目資助,系司法部國(guó)家法治與法學(xué)理論研究項(xiàng)目中青年課題《對(duì)民事違法審判行為的檢察監(jiān)督》(15SFB3020)階段性研究成果
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 邵寨寬;;“拒絕作證”析[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1991年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1949880