本文選題：自辯權(quán) + 會(huì)見權(quán)　； 參考：《青島大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：刑事被追訴人辯護(hù)權(quán)的有效實(shí)施,更多的是被委托在辯護(hù)人身上。作為刑事訴訟程序的主角,其要求主動(dòng)性辯護(hù)的天性更多的被賦予他人,被動(dòng)會(huì)見、無主動(dòng)性閱卷、調(diào)查取證,其自主性辯護(hù)權(quán)的有效實(shí)施往往依托于辯護(hù)人這一角色,導(dǎo)致其與辯護(hù)人之間無法合一的與控方處于平等對(duì)抗地位,出現(xiàn)“斷裂的辯護(hù)”,出現(xiàn)法庭上辯方處于較為弱勢(shì)的不利形勢(shì),而這些情形實(shí)質(zhì)上不利于被追訴人生命尊嚴(yán)、人身自由權(quán)的保障,更不利于其自辯權(quán)的有效實(shí)現(xiàn),同時(shí)被追訴人人身財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的侵犯又能否作為其自被采取強(qiáng)制措施之日起公、檢、法程序違法情形的辯護(hù)點(diǎn)。這些問題的研究均離不開將辯護(hù)權(quán)不僅從字面形式上歸位于被追訴人這一元主體,更應(yīng)從實(shí)質(zhì)上有效的保障被追訴人刑事自辯權(quán)的實(shí)施,保障被追訴人要求會(huì)見的主動(dòng)性,要求閱卷的需要,要求調(diào)查取證的權(quán)利,同時(shí)應(yīng)考慮到如果賦予被追訴人太多程序上的權(quán)利,是否不利于案件的查明,不利于案件的最終審判,又如何定位被追訴人與辯護(hù)人之間的關(guān)系,這一切需要從立法和司法層面上保障被追訴人自辯權(quán)的有效實(shí)現(xiàn),同時(shí)離不開法律共同體司法理念與司法程序的認(rèn)知與應(yīng)用,更離不開社會(huì)生活中每個(gè)人對(duì)法律條文背后的理解,而這一切都將有利于國(guó)家司法公正更好的發(fā)展,有利于保障刑事被追訴人自辯權(quán)的實(shí)質(zhì)展開及對(duì)其生命、尊嚴(yán)捍衛(wèi)的尊重。
[Abstract]:The effective implementation of the defense right of the criminal prosecution is more entrusted to the defender. As the protagonist of the criminal procedure, its nature of asking for active defense is more entrusted to others, passive interview, no active marking, investigation and evidence collection, and its effective implementation of the right to independent defense often depends on the role of the defender. As a result, it is in an equal position of confrontation with the prosecution that cannot be United with the defender, there is a "broken defense", and the unfavorable situation of the defense in the court is relatively weak, and these circumstances are actually not conducive to the human dignity of the person being prosecuted. The protection of the right to personal liberty is not conducive to the effective realization of their right to defend themselves. At the same time, whether the infringements of the personal property rights of the accused person can be used as a defense point for the illegal situation of public, procuratorial and legal procedures since the date of taking compulsory measures. The research of these problems is inseparable from the fact that the right of defense should not only be placed literally in the subject of prosecution, but also effectively protect the implementation of the accused person's right of criminal self-defense, and ensure the initiative of the accused person to meet with the accused person. The need to request a file review and the right to investigate and obtain evidence, taking into account whether the granting of too many procedural rights to the accused is not conducive to the identification of the case and to the final trial of the case, And how to locate the relationship between the accused and the defender, all of which need to ensure the effective realization of the accused person's right of self-defense from the legislative and judicial levels, and at the same time, it is inseparable from the cognition and application of the judicial concept and judicial procedure of the legal community. Moreover, it is necessary for everyone in the social life to understand the legal provisions, which will be conducive to the better development of national judicial justice, to the protection of the substantive development of the criminal prosecution's right to defend himself and to the respect for his life and dignity.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：青島大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙秉志;孟軍;;我國(guó)刑事訴訟中的隱私權(quán)保護(hù)——以刑事被追訴人為視角[J];法治研究;2017年02期

2 白冰;;論被告人閱卷權(quán)的理論基礎(chǔ)[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2016年04期

3 孔令勇;;論辯護(hù)律師與被告人審前全面核實(shí)證據(jù)的正當(dāng)性[J];浙江工商大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年04期

4 馬傳貝;;論以審判為中心訴訟制度下的控辯審關(guān)系[J];法制與社會(huì);2016年16期

5 龍建明;;刑事被追訴人人身權(quán)與財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)差別保護(hù)研究[J];江漢學(xué)術(shù);2016年02期

6 謝小劍;揭麗萍;;論辯護(hù)律師核實(shí)證據(jù)的限度[J];證據(jù)科學(xué);2015年05期

7 郜占川;;論刑事被告人“閱卷權(quán)”及其實(shí)現(xiàn)途徑[J];蘭州學(xué)刊;2015年06期

8 張?jiān)屏?;刑事被告人的閱卷權(quán)探析[J];理論與改革;2015年03期

9 亢晶晶;;協(xié)同主義訴訟模式在刑事訴訟中的導(dǎo)入——兼談我國(guó)控辯審關(guān)系的反思與重構(gòu)[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2015年03期

10 王弘寧;劉佩;;中美刑事被追訴人權(quán)利保護(hù)差異性研究[J];刑法論叢;2014年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 譚羽;被追訴人會(huì)見權(quán)研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2016年

2 姚雨;刑事被追訴方調(diào)查取證權(quán)研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：1949862