本文選題：民事執(zhí)行 + 執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證�。� 參考：《吉林大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證制度，是指民事執(zhí)行活動(dòng)中，通過(guò)舉行聽(tīng)證方式，賦予當(dāng)事人及利害關(guān)系人充分表達(dá)意見(jiàn)的權(quán)利，經(jīng)過(guò)舉證、質(zhì)證、辯論，查明事實(shí)，作出裁決，從而保障執(zhí)行工作順利進(jìn)行，同時(shí)最大限度保障當(dāng)事人權(quán)益不受侵犯。執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證在各地法院實(shí)施以來(lái)，緩和了執(zhí)行階段的矛盾，提高了執(zhí)行公信力。但是，，執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證由于沒(méi)有統(tǒng)一規(guī)范，各地做法差異較大，地方色彩較濃，個(gè)別案件出現(xiàn)了聽(tīng)證適用的混亂情況，不利于執(zhí)行工作開(kāi)展，有必要對(duì)執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證進(jìn)行充分的制度完善。本文以此為出發(fā)點(diǎn)，對(duì)民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證制度的構(gòu)建分為三個(gè)部分進(jìn)行論述。 本文第一部分對(duì)民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證的基本問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了梳理。執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證的理論源泉是“自然主義”和“程序主義”理念，具有公開(kāi)性、法定性、普適性和程序性特征，同時(shí)具有當(dāng)事人主義、程序性審查和救濟(jì)性色彩。執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證還具有維護(hù)執(zhí)行公正、提高執(zhí)行效率、預(yù)防執(zhí)行腐敗等作用。 本文第二部分對(duì)我國(guó)執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證的制度、實(shí)踐進(jìn)行審視。各級(jí)法院對(duì)本轄區(qū)制定了執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證規(guī)則，取得了較好的法律效果和社會(huì)效果。但不可否認(rèn)，執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證存在立法缺失、程序運(yùn)行不規(guī)范等問(wèn)題，造成這些問(wèn)題的原因既有制度層面的，也有觀念層面的。 本文第三部分對(duì)我國(guó)執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證程序制度進(jìn)行了完善。完善執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證制度，首先要明確其應(yīng)當(dāng)遵循的基本原則，在此基礎(chǔ)之上對(duì)案件適用范圍、具體程序運(yùn)行、證據(jù)制度和相關(guān)配套制度進(jìn)行細(xì)化和明確。
[Abstract]:The system of hearing for civil execution refers to the right of the parties and interested parties to fully express their opinions through the holding of hearings in civil enforcement activities, after proof, cross-examination, debate, ascertaining the facts and making a ruling, To ensure the smooth implementation of the work, while the maximum protection of the rights and interests of the parties are not infringed. Since the implementation of the execution hearing in various courts, the contradictions in the execution stage have been alleviated and the credibility of the execution has been enhanced. However, due to the lack of uniform norms, the practice of the implementation of the hearing is quite different, the local color is strong, individual cases appear the chaos of the hearing, which is not conducive to the implementation of the work, it is necessary to carry out a full system to improve the implementation of the hearing. This article takes this as the starting point, the construction of the civil execution hearing system is divided into three parts. The first part of this paper combs the basic problems of civil execution hearing. The theoretical source of the executive hearing is "naturalism" and "procedural doctrine", which have the characteristics of openness, legality, universality and procedure, and at the same time have the color of litigant doctrine, procedural review and relief. The executive hearing also has the function of maintaining the execution justice, improving the execution efficiency, preventing the execution corruption and so on. The second part of this paper examines the system and practice of executive hearing in China. Courts at all levels have formulated rules for the execution of hearings in their respective jurisdictions, which have achieved better legal and social effects. However, it is undeniable that there are some problems in the executive hearing, such as the lack of legislation and the irregular operation of the procedure. The causes of these problems are both institutional and conceptual. The third part of this article has carried on the consummation to our country execution hearing procedure system. In order to perfect the system of execution hearing, it is necessary to clarify the basic principles which should be followed, on the basis of which the scope of application of the case, the operation of specific procedures, the system of evidence and related supporting systems should be refined and clarified.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 陳小文;程序正義的哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)[J];比較法研究;2003年01期

2 童兆洪;論民事執(zhí)行權(quán)的性質(zhì)[J];法律適用;2003年10期

3 婁正前;;執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證程序的反思與完善[J];法律適用;2005年12期

4 馮蘊(yùn)強(qiáng);“執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證”之必要與可行[J];法學(xué)雜志;2001年03期

5 雷運(yùn)龍;;芻議民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證制度的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];法學(xué)雜志;2006年06期

6 竹下守夫,白綠鉉;日本民事執(zhí)行制度概況[J];人民司法;2001年06期

7 胡家強(qiáng);樸振吾;李鵬飛;;民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證問(wèn)題初探[J];山東商業(yè)職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

本文編號(hào)：1940553