本文選題：刑事審判監(jiān)督程序 + 禁止雙重危險��； 參考：《遼寧大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文的研究對象是刑事審判監(jiān)督程序在啟動方面存在的問題。該程序?qū)嶋H上是將裁判的既判力與法的公正性進行權衡的結果,它在糾正冤假錯案、維護法的公正性方面發(fā)揮重要的作用。啟動刑事審判監(jiān)督程序是審判監(jiān)督程序的基礎階段,是發(fā)揮其應有作用的關鍵所在。但是,在傳統(tǒng)指導思想和實體真實主義觀的深刻影響下,我國的刑事審判監(jiān)督程序過于強調(diào)發(fā)現(xiàn)案件事實本身的真相,從而容易忽略了其他一些重要的法律價值觀念,比如保障人權價值、程序公正價值、訴訟效率價值等,導致該程序在司法實踐中難以發(fā)揮其應有的功能。筆者認為,任何一種司法制度的設計都是在權衡各種價值利益進行綜合比較的情況下進行選擇的結果,而不是隨心所欲選擇的,刑事審判監(jiān)督程序當然也是針對司法實踐選擇的結果。黨的十八屆四中全會《決定》提出,“提出再審重在解決依法糾錯、維護裁判權威和健全冤假錯案有效防范、及時糾正機制保障當事人依法行使申訴權利�！备鶕�(jù)黨的政策性規(guī)定,可以得知,再審程序?qū)τ谌藱啾Ｕ�、糾正冤假錯案的重要意義。但是實踐中該程序有許多規(guī)定存在不合理之處,例如當事人重復進行申訴而不能進入再審程序的案件,已經(jīng)嚴重損害司法的公正性和權威性。現(xiàn)階段我國對刑事審判監(jiān)督程序啟動方面的問題研究還處于探索階段,相關法律的制定和實施還不完善,還存在著許多問題。隨著社會的發(fā)展,一系列冤假錯案件頻繁發(fā)生,社會大眾開始質(zhì)疑司法的公正和權威,人民群體甚至開始對法律本身存在質(zhì)疑。我國啟動審判監(jiān)督程序本身意在關注社會公眾的利益,發(fā)揮其真正的作用,但是理論支撐不夠,法律規(guī)定不完善,導致許多問題的發(fā)生,所以研究提起刑事審判監(jiān)督程序方面的問題并提出與之相應的對策和建議具有重要的現(xiàn)實意義。本文由四大部分構成。第一部分介紹啟動刑事審判監(jiān)督程序的基本概述,其中包括基本概念、構成要素及啟動該程序的價值所在。第二部分介紹域外啟動刑事審判監(jiān)督程序的基本情況,包括啟動的理論基礎分析、主體分析、理由分析,以及我國可以借鑒的一些地方。第三部分介紹我國在提起刑事審判監(jiān)督程序方面存在的問題,如啟動該程序的理念存在偏差、啟動主體不合理、提起理由過于籠統(tǒng)等。第四部分,就啟動刑事審判監(jiān)督程序的不足提出完善措施,如更新啟動程序的理念、科學界定啟動的主體、明確啟動理由等。
[Abstract]:The object of this paper is the problems in the initiation of the criminal trial supervision procedure. In fact, the procedure is the result of weighing the res judicata and the justice of law, and it plays an important role in correcting cases of wrongs and safeguarding the impartiality of law. Criminal trial supervision procedure is the basic stage of trial supervision procedure and the key to play its due role. However, under the profound influence of the traditional guiding ideology and the materialistic view, the criminal trial supervision procedure in our country places too much emphasis on discovering the truth of the facts of the case itself, thus neglecting some other important legal values. For example, the value of safeguarding human rights, the value of procedural justice, the value of litigation efficiency, and so on, which makes it difficult for the procedure to play its due function in judicial practice. The author believes that the design of any kind of judicial system is the result of the comprehensive comparison of various value and interests, not the choice of any kind of judicial system. Of course, the procedure of criminal trial supervision is also the result of judicial practice. The "decision" of the fourth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee put forward, "it is proposed that retrial should focus on resolving the correction of errors in accordance with the law, safeguarding the authority of the adjudicators and improving the effective prevention of miscarriage of justice, and timely correcting mechanisms to ensure that the parties concerned exercise their right to appeal according to law." According to the policy regulation of the Party, we can know that the retrial procedure is of great significance to the protection of human rights and the correction of unjust and false cases. However, in practice, there are many unreasonable provisions in this procedure, such as cases in which the parties repeatedly appeal and cannot enter the retrial procedure, which have seriously damaged the impartiality and authority of the judiciary. At present, the research on the initiation of criminal trial supervision procedure in China is still in the exploratory stage, the formulation and implementation of relevant laws are not perfect, and there are still many problems. With the development of the society, a series of unjust and false cases occur frequently, the public begin to question the justice and authority of the judiciary, and the people's groups even begin to question the law itself. Our trial supervision procedure itself is intended to pay attention to the interests of the public and play its real role, but the theoretical support is not enough and the legal provisions are not perfect, leading to many problems. Therefore, it is of great practical significance to study the problems of criminal trial supervision procedure and put forward corresponding countermeasures and suggestions. This paper consists of four parts. The first part introduces the basic outline of starting the criminal trial supervision procedure, including the basic concept, the constituent elements and the value of starting the procedure. The second part introduces the basic situation of the foreign criminal trial supervision procedure, including the theoretical basis analysis, the main body analysis, the reason analysis, as well as some places that our country can use for reference. The third part introduces the problems existing in the procedure of criminal trial supervision in our country, such as the deviation of the idea of starting the procedure, the unreasonable starting subject, the general reason of raising the procedure and so on. In the fourth part, the author puts forward some perfect measures to improve the procedure of criminal trial supervision, such as renewing the concept of starting procedure, scientifically defining the subject of starting, and defining the reasons for starting.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 卞建林;桂夢美;;啟動刑事審判監(jiān)督程序的困境與出路[J];法學;2016年04期

2 王少帥;;理想與現(xiàn)實:刑事訴訟再審啟動程序問題研究[J];公民與法(法學版);2015年01期

3 宋婷婷;;論我國刑事再審程序提起主體[J];勞動保障世界(理論版);2012年02期

4 樓伯坤;吳海云;;刑事再審啟動程序比較研究[J];江蘇警官學院學報;2009年01期

5 焦悅勤;;公正與效率視野下的刑事再審程序重構[J];理論導刊;2006年08期

6 萬毅;;論刑事審判監(jiān)督程序的現(xiàn)代轉(zhuǎn)型[J];上海交通大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2005年06期

7 鄧思清,蔡巍;論我國刑事再審啟動程序的缺陷及其完善[J];人民檢察;2004年09期

8 鄧思清;完善我國刑事再審啟動程序之構想[J];當代法學;2004年03期

9 張述元;論刑事審判監(jiān)督程序的理論基礎[J];政法論壇;2004年01期

10 徐美君,李奮飛;刑事再審程序的理性思考[J];法學;2000年10期

相關碩士學位論文 前9條

1 張柯;論刑事再審程序的啟動[D];華東政法大學;2015年

2 孔立虎;刑事再審程序問題研究[D];河北大學;2013年

3 韓芳;論刑事再審程序啟動主體[D];黑龍江大學;2013年

4 伍文振;刑事再審制度研究[D];廣西師范大學;2013年

5 鄒慧敏;刑事再審程序研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學;2012年

6 麥苗;論刑事再審程序的啟動[D];西南政法大學;2009年

7 吳海云;刑事再審啟動程序研究[D];浙江工商大學;2008年

8 唐佳紅;論刑事再審程序的完善[D];西南政法大學;2008年

9 鄢云峰;刑事再審啟動程序研究[D];湘潭大學;2007年

，

本文編號：1925286