本文選題：刑事訴訟 + 第三人�。� 參考：《暨南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：新刑事訴訟法的出臺(tái)讓我們更加意識(shí)到第三人財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù)的重要性，雖然新法在一定層面上保護(hù)了訴訟中第三人的財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益，但依然存在不足的地方，比如說(shuō)在保護(hù)范圍上還不夠?qū)挿海诒Ｗo(hù)力度上及救濟(jì)程序上都存在缺陷。同時(shí)，理論界對(duì)刑事訴訟中第三人財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保障的研究也較為缺乏，可謂是一大遺憾。為應(yīng)對(duì)理論與實(shí)踐上的困境，本文從不同的角度對(duì)該問(wèn)題進(jìn)行全面的分析研究，，既包括理論上的分析，也包括實(shí)踐上的分析，從而提出個(gè)人建議，以此做到盡善盡美。 論文的第一部分為緒論，是總的概括，對(duì)這篇文章起到提綱挈領(lǐng)的作用；第二部分為刑事訴訟中第三人財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)存在的主要問(wèn)題，在于闡述刑事訴訟中第三人的含義以及分析其財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)在刑事訴訟中存在主要問(wèn)題；第三部分主要是對(duì)第三人財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保障存在的問(wèn)題的全面透析，主要是原因、程序上的缺陷以及實(shí)踐中財(cái)產(chǎn)認(rèn)定困難的分析與研究；第四部分是對(duì)域外保護(hù)刑事訴訟中的第三人財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益的分析，主要是分析美國(guó)、英國(guó)、日本、德國(guó)在這個(gè)問(wèn)題上值得借鑒的地方；第五部分為對(duì)加強(qiáng)第三人財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的建言，主要從原則、保障程序的建構(gòu)、裁決程序的合理化等方面提出個(gè)人建議。
[Abstract]:The introduction of the new criminal procedure law makes us more aware of the importance of the protection of the property rights of the third party. Although the new law protects the property rights of the third party in the lawsuit on a certain level, there are still shortcomings. For example, in the scope of protection is not broad enough, in the strength of protection and relief procedures are flawed. At the same time, the research on the protection of the third party's property right in the criminal procedure is lacking, which is a great regret. In order to deal with the dilemma in theory and practice, this paper makes a comprehensive analysis of the problem from different angles, including both theoretical analysis and practical analysis, so as to put forward personal suggestions so as to achieve perfection. The first part of the paper is the introduction, which is a general summary of the article. The second part is the main problems in the protection of the property rights of the third party in the criminal proceedings. It is to elaborate the meaning of the third party in the criminal procedure and to analyze the main problems of its property right in the criminal procedure. The third part is mainly about the comprehensive analysis of the problems existing in the protection of the third party's property right, mainly the reasons. The fourth part is the analysis of the extraterritorial protection of the property rights and interests of the third party in criminal proceedings, mainly the analysis of the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, The fifth part is the suggestion to strengthen the protection of the third party's property right, mainly from the aspects of principle, the construction of safeguard procedure, the rationalization of adjudication procedure and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：暨南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.2;D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 葉青,周登諒;刑事審前司法聽(tīng)證制度的透析與前瞻[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年04期

2 喬玲;;英國(guó)的民事追繳制度及其對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示[J];公安學(xué)刊(浙江警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2010年01期

3 楊曉迪;;論刑事訴訟財(cái)產(chǎn)異議制度之建構(gòu)——以刑事偵查階段之財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)為視角[J];河南司法警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

4 吳_揞

本文編號(hào)：1875072